27 Apr: Racismws … Truthseeker 24

27 Apr 2015: Racismws: Home of Trojan Horse Press. 08 May 2014: TTRacismWS: Ten observations about Donald Sterlings racist rant. 01 Dec 2013: Racism is White Supremacy: Home of Trojan Horse Press.

27 Apr: Racism: Home of Trojan Press

Racismws: Home of Trojan Horse Press

27 April 2015; 01:42 am

Excerpt of comment initially posted as response to [Lara: December 1, 2013 at 4:50 am; Trojan Pam: December 1, 2013 at 9:22 pm; Lara: December 2, 2013 at 4:19 am [censored]]; to RacismWS: Racism is White Supremacy:

——– begin excerpt ———
@Pam

Thanks for response. Taking time to digest is a good idea. Going back to pre-civilization history, to understand how totalitarian agriculture changed gender and inter-tribal relations, and the effect on current relations is a big step, towards going to the root of the problem.

My comments here are my experience and working hypothesis, I do not pretend they are an absolute truth, and am totally willing to change them, given evidence to the contrary. I welcome you to do so, if you wish. You appear passionate about your perspective of white supremacy, and if you can point out errors in my thinking, thats great.

The Masonic Human Factory Farmers ‘management of the seething energies of lucifer’ (or what you call white supremacy) would prefer that you do not investigate the root of the ‘white supremacy’ brain tumour problem, but simply focus on the symptoms, and take asprins (soma) to make you feel better that you are doing something about the problem, while you are in fact only dealing with the symptom of the problem.

Racism/White supremacy is one of the most public overt dominant symptoms of the covert secret (society) dominant system on the planet. ‘Racism’ is the headache symptom of the root cause brain tumour.

One of the ways in which the secret societies divide and conquer and manipulate is through the use of abstract language; and the general public’s ignorance of the use of abstract language to manipulate and control, by means of failing to provide clear and succinct definitions for thier abstract terminology.

My definition of racism: A belief about one individual or groups ‘superiority’ to another individual or group cannot be legally ‘racist/supremacist’ (i.e. morally unethical); if it is (a) sincerely held (the believer sincerely with all his heart believes the erroneous objectively false belief); and/or (b) objectively true.

A belief about ‘racism/supremacy’ can only be legally ‘racist/supremacist’ if it is (a) insincerely held (if the person knows of evidence to the contrary, or if the person deliberately avoids engaging with persons who provide him of information and evidence showing his ‘supremacy’ ideas to be false).

Would you agree I would be an absolute moronic imbecile to refuse to admit that (a) Venus Williams is superior at tennis to 99% of all women on the planet?; (b) the bushmen are superior to blacks, africans and asians at living sustainably and in harmony with nature and other species?

Imagine I accused you of ‘racism’ for saying Venus Williams is superior at tennis to 99% of all women. Wouldn’t you think I was either (a) dum***k stupid; or (b) maliciously refuse to admit to a fact of reality; for the purpose of attempting to maintain some ‘moral authority’ by screaming ‘racist’?

I have no problem admitting when any individual from any race, has a skill, or character trait, or behaviour that is superior to me. NONE. Admitting another’s superiority on any skill, is an opportunity to study that individuals skills and thereby improve your own skills. Denying their superiority, denies you the ability to learn their superior skill. Check out the research of Dunning and Kruger; about how ignorant people refuse to admit they are ignorant, and thereby remain ignorant. I have no doubt that there are many skills you may have wherein you are way superior to me; and that there are other skills that I may be superior to you at. That is the reality of living in a world of individuals, as opposed to grey conformist automatons.

Why do black people avoid a discussion about why they refuse to procreate responsibly? Why is it racist to ask a black person: ‘why do you have so many kids you cannot afford; don’t you know about contraception?’ Why can black people not admit that they have trouble controlling their sexuality, in terms of the procreation consequences, breeding unwanted and unloved children into poverty and misery? What must I, as a white person say to other white people, when I confront them about their bigotry, when they ask me why they should take responsibility for their inferior morality about how black people are sexually incapable of personal discipline; when black people refuse to take public responsibility for confronting that allegation and examining it, and proving their moral superiority, by doing something about it, if the allegation is true?

When I engage blacks on these issues; they will bring up the issue of slavery, and jim crow/apartheid. For some or other reason I cannot fathom, blacks and jews love victimhood. Whites and asians slaughtered each other, mass murdered each other, enslaved each other, persecuted each other, for hundreds of years. The British English almost exterminated the Afrikaner boers in the Boer war concentration camps (one of the largest genocides of any tribe in a single war). Very very few boers (of whom I am one, a large portion of my ancestors died in boer concentration camps) will use the boer war genocide as justification for current moral incapacity.

Most whites simply confront the reality that their mass murder of each other, and other races of each other, was simply the ‘rule of force’ / rule of men, system of jurisprudence that was going at the time; they remember it, and learn from it, but don’t wallow in it (except for here and there a group, such as the jesuits, like victim puppies wallow about Luthers reformation). If your ancestors had migrated from africa, to europe, then overtime they would have lost their melanin, and due to living in a freezing climate, had to develop cognitive skills to plan for the future (to avoid starving in winter).
Your ancestors stayed in africa, where they initially created civilizations (zimbabwe etc), and when population pressures increased, they resorted to selling their surplus population as slaves to muslims, for hundreds of years before the white man arrived. Due to living in a year long warm climate, they never developed the cognitive skills for long term planning, to (a) adopt a K reproductive strategy (low procreation and lots of emotional, psychological and financial investment into children); and (b) did not have to develop cognitive faculties to save resources to survive long cold winters (See: Jared Diamond: Guns, Germs and Steel).

Returning to racism/ws:

The ‘system’ you call ‘racism/white supremacy’ is not held up by ‘God’ or some external force. It is very similar to the snow on a mountain, that is made up of millions of snowflakes. ‘Racism’ occurs, when enough of those snowflakes (of whatever race/culture) have insincere motives and intentions, and prefer bullshit the public relations, instead of facing reality and admitting to difficult truth; and sincerely engaging with other snowflakes of all races, about what is or is not ‘superior’ or inferior.

The ‘racist’ system occurs when enough snowflakes of all races, refuse to honestly and honourably engage, meritoriously about what is and is not superior conduct, and reward those who are in fact superior in any given skill for the community to benefit from such superior skill. Instead malicious snowflakes of all races, prefer to engage in bullshit the public relations to manipulate their fanclub against another malicious snowflakes fanclub, and avoid sincere discussion about what is and is not ‘superior conduct’; to establish a system based purely on merit, with total disregard for the snowflakes race, culture, etc. Many malicious snowflakes may hide on the mountain, and the difference between the snow staying on the mountain, or forming an avalanche to create a systemic system of racism/white supremacy, can be as low as the decision of one snowflake!
——– end excerpt ———

Food for Thought:

Current WiP ‘Guns, Germs & Steele’ Tesla Anti-gravity type HAARP weather warfare technology plausibly used to generate among others Haiti, Indian Ocean and Fukushima — which resulted in Daichi Nuclear Power plant meltdown — earthquake tsunamis; Iceland volcano; etc. This technology was referred to a few years ago by Russian White Nationalist: Vladimir Zhirinovsky. It was plausibly used yesterday in Kathmandu Nepal; which resulted in an avalanche on Mt. Everest; killing among others Sherpa’s and Google executivehikers; with large waste footprint. For more info on Scarcity Combatant Procreation and consumption waste-footprints; see EoP PoW’s v Nobel Laurettes (PDF).

Do you think the international implementation of an Ecology of Peace Referendum would enable all scarcity combatant people of all races; classes, cultures and religions to have the ““solution”to the biggest problem on the planet”? Info on EoP Referendum can be found in 09 March 2015 correspondence to PM Benjamin Netanyahu & Muslim Leaders: Re: EoP Referendum Option Ideas (PDF).

Excerpt from EoP -v- WiP culture negotiations comment to Sgt Maj. Bryan Battaglia: Senior Enlisted Advisor to Chairman JCS; Military History: 70th Anniversary of Auschwitz liberation by Red Army [SS][Copy]:

“If there is to be a civil war let it be a verbal In Your Face — “The only way the problems can be solved. First the white man and the black man have to be able to sit down at the same table. The white man has to be able to feel free to speak his mind without worrying about hurting the feelings of the negro. The socalled negro has to feel free to speak his mind without worrying about hurting the feelings of the white man. The soldiers have to be able to feel free to speak their minds without worrying about hurting the feelings of the civilians. The civilians have to feel free to speak their minds without hurting the feelings of the soldiers. Then they can bring the EoP v WiP issues that are under the rug out on top of the table and take an intelligent approach to get the problem solved.” [ amended http://bit.ly/1LcfNTV http://bit.ly/1BsnXlv ] — honourable one…..”

Excerpt of Comments to: Press TV: Chinese Foreign Minister to P5+1: Seize opportunity in talks:
————–
Quite simply: Do you know of any Muslim and African military, political, corporate or religious leader; or any of their European military, corporate, political or religious white guilt liberal Masonic slavemasters who thinks that Muslims and/or Africans are intellectually, religiously and/or physically capable of conquering thier ego’s and penis/vagina’s to practice Ecology of Peace responsible freedom procreation practices.

I doubt it. I imagine if the majority of Muslim and African military, political, corporate or religious leaders were brutally honest with their Muslim and/or African followers they would tell them: When it comes to your breeding practices; you are not equal to the average white man or woman; you are not even equal to many animals in the wild who are capable of practicing responsible freedom procreation practices and do not breed like cockroaches on viagra. When it comes to procreation equality; the majority of Muslims and Africans could be equal to cockroaches; except for the fact that cockroaches don’t pretend they want to be called ‘humans’.

Imagine there were one or more, a dozen or a few dozen such Muslim and African military, political, corporate or religious leaders who wanted to or were willing to be brutally honest with their Muslim and/or African followers about adopting a ‘jihad / struggle’ to conquer thier own penis/vagina’s and start to breed like humans not cockroaches on viagra; what would be the response of these Muslim and African’s white guilt two faced liberal Masonic European corporate, political and particularly media slavemasters?

Hysterical screeching of ‘Uncle Tom’ [ http://bit.ly/1GGLmDT ] or ‘racist’ or ‘islamophobic’ [ http://bit.ly/1GGLwuY ] ?
————–

Copies of Comments: Trojan Horse Press: Lara-Pam; Censored; Lara-Prince & Donald Sterling: Lara-Pam.

*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~**~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*

27 April 2015 17:25 PM: Sorry forgot to include PDF link: here it is: For more info on Scarcity Combatant Procreation and consumption waste-footprints; see EoP PoW’s v Nobel Laurettes (PDF).

.

TT & RacismWS: Ten observations about Donald Sterlings racist rant

TTRacismWS: Ten observations about Donald Sterlings racist rant

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

“He is not the villain, black censorship (which doesn’t exist) is.”
I am still waiting (copies: EoP | WiP) for you to demonstrate that your black culture (whatever the fuck your black culture is, I don’t know, but it sure ain’t the same as my former husband’s black culture) gives a flying fuck about a concept of ‘honour’ to even define it; cause if you did have such a concept and even more surprising had the capability of practicing it, you would define what the fuck you mean by ‘racism’. I am not holding my breath.
So: do you in your black culture care one iota for the concept of honour, and if so what is your definition and do you bother to practice it, and if so how often, if ever?
If you do have such a concept, and consequent definition of honour; perhaps you will some day provide your definition for ‘racism’?
You ain’t nothing more than just another black or white or pink or green or dumbfuck confused unconscious parasite stooge of the Masonic colonizers who have brainwashed your mind with their left and right / black and white wing Morpheus victim pity party bullshit. Who made you so stupid to believe the earth is flat, resources are infinite, and you can breed like rabbits on viagra and there won’t be resource war consequences for breeding like you are nothing more than cockroaches, who can’t control the consequences of your lack of control over your genital procreative behaviour?

Blogger Andrea Muhrrteyn said…

Copy of RacismWS censored comment:

Lara says:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.

December 2, 2013 at 4:19 am

@Pam

Thanks for response. Taking time to digest is a good idea. Going back to pre-civilization history, to understand how totalitarian agriculture changed gender and inter-tribal relations, and the effect on current relations is a big step, towards going to the root of the problem.

My comments here are my experience and working hypothesis, I do not pretend they are an absolute truth, and am totally willing to change them, given evidence to the contrary. I welcome you to do so, if you wish. You appear passionate about your perspective of white supremacy, and if you can point out errors in my thinking, thats great.

The Masonic Human Factory Farmers ‘management of the seething energies of lucifer’ (or what you call white supremacy) would prefer that you do not investigate the root of the ‘white supremacy’ brain tumour problem, but simply focus on the symptoms, and take asprins (soma) to make you feel better that you are doing something about the problem, while you are in fact only dealing with the symptom of the problem.

Racism/White supremacy is one of the most public overt dominant symptoms of the covert secret (society) dominant system on the planet. ‘Racism’ is the headache symptom of the root cause brain tumour.

One of the ways in which the secret societies divide and conquer and manipulate is through the use of abstract language; and the general public’s ignorance of the use of abstract language to manipulate and control, by means of failing to provide clear and succinct definitions for thier abstract terminology.

My definition of racism (image definition of racism): A belief about one individual or groups ‘superiority’ to another individual or group cannot be legally ‘racist/supremacist’ (i.e. morally unethical); if it is (a) sincerely held (the believer sincerely with all his heart believes the erroneous objectively false belief); and/or (b) objectively true.

A belief about ‘racism/supremacy’ can only be legally ‘racist/supremacist’ if it is (a) insincerely held (if the person knows of evidence to the contrary, or if the person deliberately avoids engaging with persons who provide him of information and evidence showing his ‘supremacy’ ideas to be false)

Would you agree I would be an absolute moronic imbecile to refuse to admit that (a) Venus Williams is superior at tennis to 99% of all women on the planet?; (b) the bushmen are superior to blacks, africans and asians at living sustainably and in harmony with nature and other species?

Imagine I accused you of ‘racism’ for saying Venus Williams is superior at tennis to 99% of all women. Wouldn’t you think I was either (a) dum***k stupid; or (b) maliciously refuse to admit to a fact of reality; for the purpose of attempting to maintain some ‘moral authority’ by screaming ‘racist’?

I have no problem admitting when any individual from any race, has a skill, or character trait, or behaviour that is superior to me. NONE. Admitting another’s superiority on any skill, is an opportunity to study that individuals skills and thereby improve your own skills. Denying their superiority, denies you the ability to learn their superior skill. Check out the research of Dunning and Kruger; about how ignorant people refuse to admit they are ignorant, and thereby remain ignorant. I have no doubt that there are many skills you may have wherein you are way superior to me; and that there are other skills that I may be superior to you at. That is the reality of living in a world of individuals, as opposed to grey conformist automatons.

11:50

 

Blogger Andrea Muhrrteyn said…

[continued]

Why do black people avoid a discussion about why they refuse to procreate responsibly? Why is it racist to ask a black person: ‘why do you have so many kids you cannot afford; don’t you know about contraception?’ Why can black people not admit that they have trouble controlling their sexuality, in terms of the procreation consequences, breeding unwanted and unloved children into poverty and misery? What must I, as a white person say to other white people, when I confront them about their bigotry, when they ask me why they should take responsibility for their inferior morality about how black people are sexually incapable of personal discipline; when black people refuse to take public responsibility for confronting that allegation and examining it, and proving their moral superiority, by doing something about it, if the allegation is true?

When I engage blacks on these issues; they will bring up the issue of slavery, and jim crow/apartheid. For some or other reason I cannot fathom, blacks and jews love victimhood. Whites and asians slaughtered each other, mass murdered each other, enslaved each other, persecuted each other, for hundreds of years. The British English almost exterminated the Afrikaner boers in the Boer war concentration camps (one of the largest genocides of any tribe in a single war). Very very few boers (of whom I am one, a large portion of my ancestors died in boer concentration camps) will use the boer war genocide as justification for current moral incapacity.

Most whites simply confront the reality that their mass murder of each other, and other races of each other, was simply the ‘rule of force’ / rule of men, system of jurisprudence that was going at the time; they remember it, and learn from it, but don’t wallow in it (except for here and there a group, such as the jesuits, like victim puppies wallow about Luthers reformation). If your ancestors had migrated from africa, to europe, then overtime they would have lost their melanin, and due to living in a freezing climate, had to develop cognitive skills to plan for the future (to avoid starving in winter). Your ancestors stayed in africa, where they initially created civilizations (zimbabwe etc), and when population pressures increased, they resorted to selling their surplus population as slaves to muslims, for hundreds of years before the white man arrived. Due to living in a year long warm climate, they never developed the cognitive skills for long term planning, to (a) adopt a an K reproductive strategy (low procreation and lots of emotional, psychological and financial investment into children); and (b) did not have to develop cognitive faculties to save resources to survive long cold winters (See: Jared Diamond: Guns, Germs and Steel).

11:50

 

Blogger Andrea Muhrrteyn said…

[continued]

Returning to racism/ws:

The ‘system’ you call ‘racism/white supremacy’ is not held up by ‘God’ or some external force. It is very similar to the snow on a mountain, that is made up of millions of snowflakes. ‘Racism’ occurs, when enough of those snowflakes (of whatever race/culture) have insincere motives and intentions, and prefer bullshit the public relations, instead of facing reality and admitting to difficult truth; and sincerely engaging with other snowflakes of all races, about what is or is not ‘superior’ or inferior.

The ‘racist’ system occurs when enough snowflakes of all races, refuse to honestly and honourably engage, meritoriously about what is and is not superior conduct, and reward those who are in fact superior in any given skill for the community to benefit from such superior skill. Instead malicious snowflakes of all races, prefer to engage in bullshit the public relations to manipulate their fanclub against another malicious snowflakes fanclub, and avoid sincere discussion about what is and is not ‘superior conduct’; to establish a system based purely on merit, with total disregard for the snowflakes race, culture, etc.

Many malicious snowflakes may hide on the mountain, and the difference between the snow staying on the mountain, or forming an avalanche to create a systemic system of racism/white supremacy, can be as low as the decision of one snowflake!

“I’m sure there are things we agree on and on those things where we disagree, we can cordially disagree. Thanks for sharing”

Totally agree.

I shall digest the other issues in your comment for now; got to run and do some errands

.

 

Racism is White Supremacy: Home of Trojan Horse Press

Racism is White Supremacy: Home of Trojan Horse Press

Lara says:
@TrojanPam
Sorry for leaving this comment here, it is in response to your ‘About the Authors’ page, which does not provide comment access, so I am posting the comment here.
You write: “Why do our books focus almost entirely on Racism/White Supremacy? Because Racism/White Supremacy is responsible for the vast majority of human suffering on the planet, whether it is global poverty, starvation, oppression, imperialism, colonialism, slavery, man-made diseases, displacement, racism, wars, and genocide, particularly, and especially, among people of color. …..[..] …… We hope all our books will accomplish our main goal: increasing understanding and reducing confusion about the system of racism/white supremacy, and ultimately replacing it with a system of JUSTICE for all the people on the planet, so that no one is mistreated, and the people who need the most help GET the most help.”
Racism/White Supremacy is not responsible for the vast majority of human suffering on the planet. Racism/White (Black etc) Supremacy are a divide and conquer symptom of Masonic Human Factory Farming Secret Societies agenda for control.
The root cause of the vast majority of human suffering is — according to my research — Masonic Secret Societies management of the ‘seething powers of lucifer’.
———-
Brief Summary: All civilized religions — from Christianity, to Gnosticism, etc — were ‘created’ in the minds of man to comprehend the concept of ‘evil’ (aka organized violence), subsequent to man’s invention of agriculture, approximately 10,000 years ago; and where such agriculture created food surpluses, resulting in population surpluses, and expansion of their territory resulting in clashes with other tribes territories, resource war conflict.
They were a consequence of psychic existential conflict to attempt to understand so-called ‘evil’; or put more simply: the conflict resulting from population pressures and escalating relations with fellow humans based upon the absence of consent, i.e. extended periods of psychic and physical violence and coercion.
Evil is defined as profoundly immoral and wicked, with synonyms: bad, wrong, morally wrong, wrongful, immoral, sinful, ungodly, unholy, foul, vile, base, ignoble, dishonourable, corrupt, iniquitous, depraved, degenerate, villainous, nefarious, sinister, vicious, malicious, malevolent, demonic, devilish, diabolic, diabolical, fiendish, dark, black-hearted.
A more simplistic subjective definition of evil I would say is: evil is that which someone capable of reason and logic does to me without my fully informed consent.
If there are two or ten people living on an island with enough food and other resources and space, for one hundred people; there is no need to coerce another for food or resources freely and abundantly available. In the absence of a resource scarcity conflict mindset, and plenty of space, tribal relations are more conductive to cooperation and sharing. Living in the moment. There is no need for an external God in the sky to explain ‘evil’; there is only a consciousness to appreciate the source of resource abundance, as the ‘source of life’; and to live in harmony with such source: nature. Violence is limited to hunting, or being hunted by a natural predator, for immediate food.
If the tribe introduces agriculture, which results in an agricultural surplus and uses such agricultural surplus to justify greater population; then as the population increases, so the populaton pressures increase. There is less space to run away from someone who may be temporarily angry, or wanting something another is not willing to provide in that moment.
The existence of ‘evil’ (absence of fully informed consenting agreements) is plausibly directly proportional to the resource war conflict, resulting from the tribe’s violation of carrying capacity limits; and/or coming into contact with another tribe’s territorial expansion as a result of their violation of carrying capacity limits.
In attempting to understand the existential meaning of this symptom of ‘evil’ resulting from violation of carrying capacity limits resource war conflict, man created religions.
In Running on Emptiness: The Failure of Symbolic Thought (See also: Running on Emptiness: The Pathology of Civilization), John Zerzan explains his perspective of the relationship between ‘civilization’ and ‘symbolic thought’; how “culture emerged as time, language, art, number, and then agriculture.”
“The word culture derives from the Latin cultura, referring to cultivation of the soil; that is, to the domestication of plants and animals—and of ourselves in the bargain. A restless spirit of innovation and anxiety has largely been with us ever since, as continually changing symbolic modes seek to fix what cannot be redressed without rejecting the symbolic and its estranged world.”
“Eli Sagan (1985) spoke for countless others in declaring that the need to symbolize and live in a symbolic world is, like aggression, a human need so basic that “it can be denied only at the cost of severe psychic disorder.” The need for symbols — and violence – did not always obtain, however. Rather, they have their origins in the thwarting and fragmenting of an earlier wholeness, in the process of domestication from which civilization issued.”
“Out of a sense of being trapped and limited by symbols comes the thesis that the extent to which thought and emotion are tied to symbolism is the measure by which absence fills the inner world and destroys the outer world.”
“We seem to have experienced a fall into representation, whose depths and consequences are only now being fully plumbed. In a fundamental sort of falsification, symbols at first mediated reality and then replaced it. At present we live within symbols to a greater degree than we do within our bodily selves or directly with each other.”
“The more involved this internal representational system is, the more distanced we are from the reality around us. Other connections, other cognitive perspectives are inhibited, to say the least, as symbolic communication and its myriad representational devices have accomplished an alienation from and betrayal of reality.”
“Closer yet is Cohen (1974), who observed that “symbols are essential for the development and maintenance of social order.” The ensemble of symbols represents the social order and the individual’s place in it, a formulation that always leaves the genesis of this arrangement unquestioned. How did our behavior come to be aligned by symbolization?
“Culture arose and flourished via domination of nature, its growth a measure of that progressive mastery that unfolded with ever greater division of labor. Malinowski (1962) understood symbolism as the soul of civilization, chiefly in the form of language as a means of coordinating action or of standardizing technique, and providing rules for social, ritual, and industrial behavior.”
“It is our fall from a simplicity and fullness of life directly experienced, from the sensuous moment of knowing, which leaves a gap that the symbolic can never bridge. This is what is always being covered over by layers of cultural consolations, civilized detouring that never recovers lost wholeness. In a very deep sense, only what is repressed is symbolized, because only what is repressed needs to be symbolized. The magnitude of symbolization testifies to how much has been repressed; buried, but possibly still recoverable.”
The invention of agriculture and agricultural surplusses, and subsequent organized violence of civilization are the story of Adam and Eve’s loss of living in carrying capacity harmony with the natural world resource abundant paradise, and Cain’s choice to be a farmer.
Symbolically, perhaps the Tower of Babel plausibly represents the attempt to reach out and escape the evil of totalitarian agriculture organized violence, to a ‘God’ in the heaven, to ask ‘why do you allow this ‘evil’ to occur’?
Others saw opportunities for socio-political status benefits from exploiting the reality of organized violence (evil), and suppressed this conscious reality of their intentions by invoking various phallic ‘right’ justifications for their ‘right’ to engage in organized violence (evil).
For example, my interpretation of the Manly Palmer Hall quote in Illustrious: the Lost Keys of Freemasonry, the ‘seething energies of lucifer’ are the psychological warfare art of manipulating and coercing men and women to overbreed and overconsume, to thereby aggravate resource war conflict, and the ability to divide and conquer people’s, for the profit of the ‘warrior’, to ‘step onward and upward’; as he ‘proves his ability’ to apply this breeding war and consumption war energies.
“When The Mason learns that the Key to the warrior on the block is the proper application of the dynamo of living power, he has learned the Mystery of his Craft. The seething energies of Lucifer are in his hands and before he may step onward and upward, he must prove his ability to properly apply this energy.” page 48
Put differently, the ‘seething energies of lucifer’ are no less than the phallic justification for profiting from aggravating and perpetuating deliberate organized violence, without the consent of the recipients of the violence.
“Civilization, very fundamentally, is the history of the domination of nature and of women. Patriarchy means rule over women and nature… “Civilized Man says: I am Self, I am Master, all the rest is other — outside, below, underneath, subservient. I own, I use, I explore, I exploit, I control. What I do is what matters. What I want is what matter is for. I am that I am, and the rest is women and wilderness, to be used as I see fit.” – John Zerzan, Patriarchy, Civilization and the Origins of Gender
—————–
Conclusion: To replace the system of Secret Society management of the seething energies of lucifer which manifest as ‘white supremacy’, ‘racism’, ‘sexism’, etc; we must address the root causes of the problem: ecological and egological illiteracy. We must establish a system that limits procreation and consumption to carrying capacity limits.
Put simply: if your christian, islamic, pagan, atheist or whatever church, or white, black, green, pink or whatever activist or cultural group you belong to; does not teach ecological literacy (aka the implementation of national and international law which limits breeding and consuming to below carrying capacity limits for everyone) it is unequivocally endorsing — consciously or unconsciously — the ‘seething energies of lucifer’ Masonic Babylonian Occult Human Factory Farm aka 666 Beast World Order.
Finally: If your racial, religious, cultural group encourages its members to breed or consume above carrying capacity limits; it is consciously or unconsciously participating in the Secret Society Human Factory Farm game of managing the ‘seething energies of lucifer’.

 

..

@ Lara
I will have to re-read your post to digest everything you’ve said.
Until I do, my belief (and I could be incorrect) is racism/white supremacy is the DOMINANT system on the planet. Why white supremacists practice racism is open to many theories. However, if I am being victimized BECAUSE I am not white, my main concern is to STOP the victimization. One thing I know for sure is racism/white supremacy is VICTIMIZING non-white people all over the planet and this is where my focus remains.
As I have stated in all my books and some of my posts, Black Supremacy does not and CANNOT exist at the same time as White Supremacy. Supremacy means ONLY ONE THING can be “supreme” at one time. Black people do not have the systems OR the power to stop white people from doing whatever they choose to do, be it in economics, education, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion, sex OR war. White people control ALL those systems and use that power to dominate non-white people.
I’m sure there are things we agree on and on those things where we disagree, we can cordially disagree. Thanks for sharing
..
  • Lara says:

    Your comment is awaiting moderation.

    @Pam
    Thanks for response. Taking time to digest is a good idea. Going back to pre-civilization history, to understand how totalitarian agriculture changed gender and inter-tribal relations, and the effect on current relations is a big step, towards going to the root of the problem.
    My comments here are my experience and working hypothesis, I do not pretend they are an absolute truth, and am totally willing to change them, given evidence to the contrary. I welcome you to do so, if you wish. You appear passionate about your perspective of white supremacy, and if you can point out errors in my thinking, thats great.
    The Masonic Human Factory Farmers ‘management of the seething energies of lucifer’ (or what you call white supremacy) would prefer that you do not investigate the root of the ‘white supremacy’ brain tumour problem, but simply focus on the symptoms, and take asprins (soma) to make you feel better that you are doing something about the problem, while you are in fact only dealing with the symptom of the problem.
    Racism/White supremacy is one of the most public overt dominant symptoms of the covert secret (society) dominant system on the planet. ‘Racism’ is the headache symptom of the root cause brain tumour.
    One of the ways in which the secret societies divide and conquer and manipulate is through the use of abstract language; and the general public’s ignorance of the use of abstract language to manipulate and control, by means of failing to provide clear and succinct definitions for thier abstract terminology.
    My definition of racism (image definition of racism): A belief about one individual or groups ‘superiority’ to another individual or group cannot be legally ‘racist/supremacist’ (i.e. morally unethical); if it is (a) sincerely held (the believer sincerely with all his heart believes the erroneous objectively false belief); and/or (b) objectively true.
    A belief about ‘racism/supremacy’ can only be legally ‘racist/supremacist’ if it is (a) insincerely held (if the person knows of evidence to the contrary, or if the person deliberately avoids engaging with persons who provide him of information and evidence showing his ‘supremacy’ ideas to be false)
    Would you agree I would be an absolute moronic imbecile to refuse to admit that (a) Venus Williams is superior at tennis to 99% of all women on the planet?; (b) the bushmen are superior to blacks, africans and asians at living sustainably and in harmony with nature and other species?
    Imagine I accused you of ‘racism’ for saying Venus Williams is superior at tennis to 99% of all women. Wouldn’t you think I was either (a) dum***k stupid; or (b) maliciously refuse to admit to a fact of reality; for the purpose of attempting to maintain some ‘moral authority’ by screaming ‘racist’?
    I have no problem admitting when any individual from any race, has a skill, or character trait, or behaviour that is superior to me. NONE. Admitting another’s superiority on any skill, is an opportunity to study that individuals skills and thereby improve your own skills. Denying their superiority, denies you the ability to learn their superior skill. Check out the research of Dunning and Kruger; about how ignorant people refuse to admit they are ignorant, and thereby remain ignorant. I have no doubt that there are many skills you may have wherein you are way superior to me; and that there are other skills that I may be superior to you at. That is the reality of living in a world of individuals, as opposed to grey conformist automatons.
    Why do black people avoid a discussion about why they refuse to procreate responsibly? Why is it racist to ask a black person: ‘why do you have so many kids you cannot afford; don’t you know about contraception?’ Why can black people not admit that they have trouble controlling their sexuality, in terms of the procreation consequences, breeding unwanted and unloved children into poverty and misery? What must I, as a white person say to other white people, when I confront them about their bigotry, when they ask me why they should take responsibility for their inferior morality about how black people are sexually incapable of personal discipline; when black people refuse to take public responsibility for confronting that allegation and examining it, and proving their moral superiority, by doing something about it, if the allegation is true?
    When I engage blacks on these issues; they will bring up the issue of slavery, and jim crow/apartheid. For some or other reason I cannot fathom, blacks and jews love victimhood. Whites and asians slaughtered each other, mass murdered each other, enslaved each other, persecuted each other, for hundreds of years. The British English almost exterminated the Afrikaner boers in the Boer war concentration camps (one of the largest genocides of any tribe in a single war). Very very few boers (of whom I am one, a large portion of my ancestors died in boer concentration camps) will use the boer war genocide as justification for current moral incapacity.

    Most whites simply confront the reality that their mass murder of each other, and other races of each other, was simply the ‘rule of force’ / rule of men, system of jurisprudence that was going at the time; they remember it, and learn from it, but don’t wallow in it (except for here and there a group, such as the jesuits, like victim puppies wallow about Luthers reformation). If your ancestors had migrated from africa, to europe, then overtime they would have lost their melanin, and due to living in a freezing climate, had to develop cognitive skills to plan for the future (to avoid starving in winter). Your ancestors stayed in africa, where they initially created civilizations (zimbabwe etc), and when population pressures increased, they resorted to selling their surplus population as slaves to muslims, for hundreds of years before the white man arrived. Due to living in a year long warm climate, they never developed the cognitive skills for long term planning, to (a) adopt a an K reproductive strategy (low procreation and lots of emotional, psychological and financial investment into children); and (b) did not have to develop cognitive faculties to save resources to survive long cold winters (See: Jared Diamond: Guns, Germs and Steel).

    Returning to racism/ws:

    The ‘system’ you call ‘racism/white supremacy’ is not held up by ‘God’ or some external force. It is very similar to the snow on a mountain, that is made up of millions of snowflakes. ‘Racism’ occurs, when enough of those snowflakes (of whatever race/culture) have insincere motives and intentions, and prefer bullshit the public relations, instead of facing reality and admitting to difficult truth; and sincerely engaging with other snowflakes of all races, about what is or is not ‘superior’ or inferior.

    The ‘racist’ system occurs when enough snowflakes of all races, refuse to honestly and honourably engage, meritoriously about what is and is not superior conduct, and reward those who are in fact superior in any given skill for the community to benefit from such superior skill. Instead malicious snowflakes of all races, prefer to engage in bullshit the public relations to manipulate their fanclub against another malicious snowflakes fanclub, and avoid sincere discussion about what is and is not ‘superior conduct’; to establish a system based purely on merit, with total disregard for the snowflakes race, culture, etc. Many malicious snowflakes may hide on the mountain, and the difference between the snow staying on the mountain, or forming an avalanche to create a systemic system of racism/white supremacy, can be as low as the decision of one snowflake!

    “I’m sure there are things we agree on and on those things where we disagree, we can cordially disagree. Thanks for sharing”

    Totally agree.

    I shall digest the other issues in your comment for now; got to run and do some errands.

..
MONEY IS NOT THE ROOT OF EVIL,BUT MEN WHO CONTROLS THE MONEY ARE THE ROOT OF EVILS.THE ACT OF MEN,MEN WHO ARE NOT CONTENTED WITH WHAT IS THEIRS,BECOME THE BEGINNING OF THE ROOT TO EVILS,{ WHEN THE LION SLEPT,MEN BEGIN TO WAKE-UP LION BY TOYING WITH THE TAIL OF A LION }THAT IS EVIL, and evil will follow evils. not because of today, but because of our FUTURE,FUTURE starts from now.When DANIEL was in the lion-den,the lions became friendly, only because DANIEL did not put himself in the DEN,because DANIEL was not the greedy one, or tempted GOD,SHEDRAK,MESAK,and OBEDNAGO,were not burnt because they were honest, truthful not greedy.GOD was with them ,IF WE CAN GO BACK TO OUR ROOT AND PLAY OUR OLDEN TRUTHFULL WAYS OF ROOTS.MEN AND MONEY SHALL NOT BE THE ROOTS OF EVILS,TKS.PRINCE.
.
  • Larasays:
    @Prince:
    Money is simply a metaphor for energy. Money represents the power to purchase energy (either from an individual or from nature). For example; you can have two million dollars in a suitcase in the back of your bentley and run out of gas, at a gas station; and it does not matter how much money you got in your suitcase, if they got no oil (energy); then you are fu**ed; and your Bentley ain’t moving.
    1 teaspoon of oil = 1 days human labour
    1 tank of gas = 2 years of human manpower labour
    Now can you imagine what is going to happen when america/the west runs out of her ‘oil slave’ labour? Who is then going to be the slaves, if america and the west do not give up their addiction to industrialization and implement a low tech subsistence agrarian economy, based upon commonsism principles, where ‘evil cheaters’ are terminated from the genepool?
    The Lion is symbolism for masonic crap, ie two faced hypocrit; are you implying that you are a two faced hypocrit lion, and that two faced hypocrit masonic lion liars should not be exposed as hypocrits?
    I have already provided my definition of evil further above, my second response to Pam has not so far been published.
    Your Daniel bible analogy escapes me. I do not endorse the christian concept of ‘god’;I consider it to be nothing but a fantasy created in the minds of men, subsequent to the invention of totalitarian agriculture, and the consequent organized violence (evil) that ensued from such breeding wars. You will have to clarify your bible analogy if you want it to be accurately interpreted.
    When you refer to ‘root’ are you referring to ‘going back to slavery’ (ie. the movie roots); and playing the (g)[Masonic regeneration seething energies of lucifer] ‘golden’ truthful ways?
    “MEN AND MONEY SHALL NOT BE THE ROOTS OF EVILS”
    It depends on what your definition is of ‘evil’; I guess. Women invented agriculture (Eve’s Seed, McElvaine) as the original foragers, but men transferred subsistence agriculture into totalitarian agriculture (Cain v Abel & Tower of Babel), and subsequently relegated women’s role in the tribe from that of forager and equal economic provider for the family, as well as equal socio-economic status in the family/tribe; to lower economic status, as the ‘brood sow slave’ to breed the economic and sexual cannon fodder for the ‘organized violent’ ‘warrior’ totalitarian agriculture men.

.