28 Feb: Malcolm X Grassroots Movement .. COWS: Context of White Supremacy

sqs-bg_gg-m_900x34

28 Feb: Malcolm X Grassroots Movement: 3 people stabbed at KKK Anaheim Rally; Black Wall Street: Criminality of Breeding Like Cockroaches; New Abolitionists Radio: The US’s growing for profit prison industry;  Pan Africanist International: Capitalism is but the gentleman’s method of slavery; Politics Nation with Al Sharpton: Trump Tower built with sweat of undocumented immigrants; Cynthia McKinney: International Order of St Hubertus; New Black Panther Party North Carolina: National Hands On In Your Face Thirty City Tour to squash roots of black violence; Derrick Grayson: Cleaning Up the BullShit; African History Network: Slavery Sex Farms; Rocky Mountain Black Conservatives: Republicans have no black people; A shot of whiskey; The Context of White Supremacy: Why I Don’t Say ‘White Privilege’.

sqs-bg_gg-m_900x34

Culture Change to EoP Honour Eco-footprint Shrinking Lifeboat Ethics? comment response to –- Malcolm X Grassroots Movement: 3 people stabbed at KKK Anaheim Rally; Black Wall Street: Criminality of Breeding Like Cockroaches; New Abolitionists Radio: The US’s growing for profit prison industry;  Pan Africanist International: Capitalism is but the gentleman’s method of slavery; Politics Nation with Al Sharpton: Trump Tower built with sweat of undocumented immigrants; Cynthia McKinney: International Order of St Hubertus; New Black Panther Party North Carolina: National Hands On In Your Face Thirty City Tour to squash roots of black violence; Derrick Grayson: Cleaning Up the BullShit; African History Network: Slavery Sex Farms; Rocky Mountain Black Conservatives: Republicans have no black people; A shot of whiskey; The Context of White Supremacy: Why I Don’t Say ‘White Privilege’.–- is available at: EoP v WiP Negotiations: Transcript of Comments Correspondence
[PDF tiny.cc / EoP-WiPCommCorr]

EoP: Ecology of Peace | WiP: Masonic War is Peace.

* ~~~~~~~ * * ~~~~~~~ * * ~~~~~~~ * * ~~~~~~~ *

If your activism to end racism, slavery, oppression, climate change; food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, climate change, feminism, nazism, Islamism, capitalism, communism, militarization of police, etc; does not include discussion of the root – ‘right to breed / consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the Masonic War is Peace social contract –overpopulation and consumption causes of those socio-economic, psycho-political and ecological resource war  problems; your activism is just another ‘Its not about the Nail’ Masonic War is Peace Bullshit the Public Relations Stunt.

grouptherapy
grouptherapy

If the nail you are hammering is to abolish the Masonic War is Peace social contract and replace it with an Ecology of Peace social contract; then that nail is simultaneously addressing a multitude of ecological overshoot problems: whether crime and violence, unemployment and poverty, food shortages, inflation, political instability, loss of political freedoms, conformist political correctness, vanishing species, garbage and pollution, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, resource depletion, etc.

Put simply the nail is in the bulls eye target zone, and each hammer strike, sends problem solving solution ripples to each of all of these problems; whereas if you find a nail and stick it in only one of these problem areas; each hammer strike is pointless; because in the absence of addressing the root cause of the problem: Masonic War is Peace ‘right to breed/consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ social contract; the particular problem you are focussed on is only going to get worse; as the tap of overpopulation / overconsumption-ecological overshoot resource scarcity grows and grows and grows.
* ~~~~~~~ * * ~~~~~~~ *

“Attaturk knew that for his movement to succeed and be permanent. He had to create a struggle that was initiated and supported by the people. Everything had to be legitimate and ideologically well-founded. A revolutionary ideal at the time it was announced to the whole country from the city of Amasia.” — Mustafa Kemal Attuturk: Attaturk the Feminist Warrior.

“The problem with being too busy to read is that you learn by experience (or by your men’s experience), i.e. the hard way. By reading, you learn through others’ experiences, generally a better way to do business, especially in our line of work where the consequences of incompetence are so final for young men.”
Gen. MadDog Mattis: Too busy to read?
— Excerpts: EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations: Comm Corr [PDF]: 31 Jan: Samuel Culper

* ~~~~~~~ * * ~~~~~~~ *

Put simply: Europe, Africa, Eurasia, America: All of humans on Planet Earth’s choices are between Ecology of Peace humane, orderly and relatively non-violent deindustrialization and depopulation; and Masonic War is Peace extremely violent Mad Max race wars, religious wars, four horses of the apocalypse Armageddon deindustrialization and depopulation.

It is true that when the European Union and World economy collapses; perhaps together; perhaps subsequent to each other by a few years [Meltdown]; the socio-economic conditions shall result in the rise of either Masonic ‘left: communist’ or ‘right: national socialist’ wing War is Peace populist extremist political parties. Irrespective of whether the extremist populist party in any particular nation is ‘left’ or ‘right’; that Masonic War is Peace populist extremist party shall need to engage in culling of the populace; to reduce the nations populace to levels closer to ecological carrying capacity limits. Both left and right wing Masonic War is Peace extremist populists shall have their respective ‘racial, cultural or religious trash’ [Soviet Story] whom they shall cull from their national genepool; whether via Stalinist Ukraine like famine; or Siberian concentration camps [Soviet Story]; or Nazi-like concentration camps [Jesuit Nazi Final Solution]; or American version Fema camps; or simply quickly and brutally Hutu-Tutsi style [Hutu-Tutsi]. There shall be mass culling. The decision-making about whom should and should not be culled; will not be based upon any racial, cultural, religious impartial ‘rule of culling law’ principle; but on the emotional hatred zeal of those in power; against perceived racial, religious or cultural group enemies; with no consideration whether individuals within that racial, religious or cultural group are guilty of the crimes; that some of their fellow racial, religious or cultural members are perceived to be guilty of by the respective Masonic Right/Left Extremist elite.

“Left right or right wing Capitalist WiP economic and population growth destroys the environment decreasing the nation’s resources. Left or Right wing Communist or National Socialist WiP economic and population growth destroys the environment decreasing the nation’s resources. The only difference is that Left or Right wing Capitalist growth does it faster and with greater economic inequality. When nations choose to follow a Masonic capitalist, communist, socialist, libertarian, Stalinist, nazi ‘right to breed/consume above ecological carrying capacity limits’ economic growth or population growth plan; they are buying a ticket on the Titanic. Whether they purchase a Left or Right Wing Neo Conservative/Liberal capitalist first-class or Left or Right wing Extremist Marxist/Nazi communist/national socialist third class steerage Titanic ticket is irrelevant. They are purchasing a ticket on the Titanic where the end sinking of the WiP capitalist/communist titanic economy; and mass covert or overt culling of ‘racial trash’ result is the same.” – amended quote of Albert Bartlett; Arithmetic, Population and Energy.

“The teachings of Marx and Engels were carefully studied by Lenin; the man who established the first Marxist country on Earth. One year after Lenin’s death in 1924, the New York Times published a small article, which at the time went almost unnoticed: “Hitlerite Riot In Berlin: Bear Glasses Fly When Speaker Compares Hitler and Lenin. It was about some newly established party in Germany. Berlin, Nov 27: The National Socialist-Labor Party, of which Adolph Hitler is patron and father, persists in believing Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted in a party meeting. Two weeks ago an attempted discussion of this subject led to one death, sixty injuries and GBP 3,000 damages to beer glasses, tables, chairs, windows and chandeliers in Chemnitz. Last night Dr Goebels tried the experiment in Berlin and only police intervention prevented a repetition of the Chemnitz affair. On Dr. Goebels assertion that Lenin was the greatest man, second only to Hitler, and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith were very slight, a faction war opened with whizzing beer glasses.” Amazing. A Future Nazi propaganda minister Goebels was openly declaring that the difference between Lenin’s communism and the Hitler faith was very slight.”  — The Soviet Story.

[..]   Are you willing to change the conversation; to have a conversation that has not been had before; to have a conversation about – ecological overshoot resource depletion tipping points and resource conflict – national resource shrinking lifeboats decision-making about ‘whom should be removed from the lifeboat aka national genepool; how should they be removed; how many should be removed; by whom and when should they be removed’?

[..]   General Mike Flynn: You can’t defeat an enemy you don’t admit exists.

Any form of capitalism that allows citizens to procreate and/or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits; cannot  – according to Tragedy of the Commons principles – do anything else but degenerate into predatory capitalism aka fascism. Of interest regarding the future impending consequences of planetary predatory capitalism: Real News: Paul Jay’s Reality Asserts Itself: Who Makes US Foreign Policy interview of Lawrence Wilkerson; particularly the predatory capitalism part; which deals with the necessity of the great powers cooperating to implement a new economic order; to address the massive impending planetary social conflict problems resulting from climate change, peak food, peak water, peak oil, including how and where to bury 6 billion people.

“If you can’t explain it simply, you don’t understand it well enough.” – Albert Einstein

  1. Economic inequality; psycho-social resource conflict conformity pressures; climate change, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, nation states standing army or dissident guerrilla army ‘terrorism’ resource war military aggression, etc – are a direct and indirect consequence of overpopulation and overconsumption.
  2. Overconsumption and overpopulation are a direct consequence of humans procreating and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits.
  3. Humans procreate and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits because the current international law social contract; allows nation states to provide their citizens with the implied ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’.
  4. Humans will stop procreating and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits when legislators amend the current international law and national constitutional social contract statutes that enable procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits; to specifically require all the worlds/their nations citizens to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits.

Excerpts: EoP Axis NWO negotiations: Diem 25: Democratize Europe [PDF]

* ~~~~~~~ * * ~~~~~~~ *

Our dilemma is that of defining just and unjust actions within our wars and conflicts. It is time to reexamine habits that have come to pass for ethics and ask the sort of questions that are as controversial as they are uncomfortable to the man or woman of conscience … We must reexamine our concepts of the ethical and the legal. .. The whispered warning that we do not condone “assassinations” because we do not want our own leader assassinated is a counsel of unspeakable cowardice. First, if leaders will not risk the fate they ask of their privates, they are not fit to lead their people. Second, if foreign criminals, official or private, knew that retribution would be generally swift and always sure, attacks on US leaders — or US citizens overall — would likely decrease wonderfully. And such a policy would return us once again to an objectively moral path.

These issues demand serious debate. Traditionalists who decry even the possibility of attacking these sources of human misery in such a manner generally do so from campuses or comfortable offices. They are out of contact with our citizenry and its needs, as they are phenomenally out of contact with the sheer violence of this world. They will immediately push the issue to absurd extremes, crying out that such a doctrine would amount to giving our military, .. a license to kill. But the purpose of a military is to kill, and if you cannot stomach that, you should not have a military.

The only operative question is whom the military should kill.

»» Col Ralph Peters: Revolution in Military Ethics

[..]    As EoP Axis Commander in Chief: Gen Dunford can withdraw Fuck Honour Multiculti Buttfuck Banana Republic America from EoP v WiP Shrinking Lifeboat Ethics [PDF] New Rules or No Rules [PDF] negotiations pending Corporate Cocksucking Rape the Planet Fortune 500 American oligarchs and Media appointing an American White House House nigger with Buck Stops Here orders to (i) withdraw from the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement; and (ii) honourably support the public and transparent implementation of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract.

“Multiculturalism: How, then, does the universe of Capital relate to the form of Nation State in our era of global capitalism? Perhaps, this relationship is best designated as ‘auto-colonization’: with the direct multinational functioning of Capital, we are no longer dealing with the standard opposition between metropolis and colonized countries; a global company as it were cuts its umbilical cord with its mother-nation and treats its country of origins as simply another territory to be colonized. This is what disturbs so much the patriotically oriented right-wing populists, from Le Pen to Buchanan: the fact that the new multinationals have towards the French or American local population exactly the same attitude as towards the population of Mexico, Brazil or Taiwan. Is there not a kind of poetic justice in this self-referential turn? Today’s global capitalism is thus again a kind of ‘negation of negation’, after national capitalism and its internationalist/colonialist phase. At the beginning (ideally, of course), there is capitalism within the confines of a Nation-State, with the accompanying international trade (exchange between sovereign Nation-States); what follows is the relationship of colonization in which the colonizing country subordinates and exploits (economically, politically, culturally) the colonized country; the final moment of this process is the paradox of colonization in which there are only colonies, no colonizing countries—the colonizing power is no longer a Nation-State but directly the global company. In the long term, we shall all not only wear Banana Republic shirts but also live in banana republics.” – Slavoy Zizek: Multiculturalism: The Cultural Logic of Multinational Capitalism.

“Another thing that bothers me about this multiculturalism is when people ask me: ‘How can you be sure that you are not a racist?’ My answer is that there is only one way. If I can exchange insults, brutal jokes, dirty jokes, with a member of a different race and we both know it’s not meant in a racist way. If, on the other hand, we play this politically correct game – ‘Oh, I respect you, how interesting your customs are’ – this is inverted racism, and it is disgusting. In the Yugoslav army where we were all of mixed nationalities, how did I become friends with Albanians? When we started to exchange obscenities, sexual innuendo, jokes. This is why this politically correct respect is just, as Freud put it, ‘zielgehemmt’. You still have the aggression towards the other. You cannot do the game of erotic seduction in politically correct terms. For me there is one measure of true love: you can insult the other. When multiculturalists tell you to respect the others, I always have this uncanny association that this is dangerously close to how we treat our children: the idea that we should respect them, even when we know that what they believe is not true. We should not destroy their illusions. No, I think that others deserve better – not to be treated like children. — Slavoj Zizek: The one measure of true love is: you can insult the other.

“… and that night, Gore didn’t concede and I wondered what the hell, what is going on; I mean Gore is no less of a player than Bush in these scenarios; I mean they all have big money behind them, sometimes the same money. Cause if you smart enough and rich enough, you bet every horse in the race. So why is Gore not conceding? …. and then I realized they want us to see; they want us to know; they want us to get the message and it was just as blatant a message as November 22, 1963. I believe that 63’s message is ‘Yeah we shot the son of a bitch, and what are you gonna do about it? We can kill the president and we sure as hell can kill you; so sit down, shut up and get out of the way.” That’s the subliminal message and a subliminal message of the 2004 election was ‘we done here had enough about this dumb duhmockery shit, we already told you who won the election, now sit your duhmckery ass down and shut up.” “Get out of the way” is the message and I think they pulled up the pettycoat and let us and let the rest of the world know.” — John Judge, Special Projects Assistant to Rep. Cynthia McKinney; as reported in Guns and Butter: We Remember Michael Ruppert and John Judge.

Excerpts: EoP Axis NWO negotiations: TPP [PDF]

* ~~~~~~~ * * ~~~~~~~ *

On Mr. Trumps ‘American jobs’ issue: I am unclear whether Mr. Trump is simply ignorant or engaged in welfare-vote-farm-slavery-plantation bullshit the public verbal diarrhoea.

Tygae IG: 15-09-27_TrumpArbeidMachtFrei

Mr. Trump’s 60 minutes interview promising American ‘jobs’. In the absence of US, Nato, Russia and China EoP Axis Officials implementing an EoP NWO international law social contract and its new low tech agrarian economy [La Proxima Economia] on the path to deindustrialization and return to ecological carrying capacity limits; the only jobs that the War is Peace NWO international law social contract – whether Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton, Jeremy Corbyn or any other politician in any country promising Masonic War is Peace freedumb slavery corporate or individual welfare on their Masonic War is Peace vote farm slavery plantation [Story of Human Factory Farm Enslavement]– are going to be able to offer their citizens are ‘Arbeid Macht Frei’ jobs.

Excerpt: EoP v WiP NWO negotiations Comm Corr [PDF]: 29 Sep 2015: Fox News.

* ~~~~~~~ * * ~~~~~~~ *

Colonialism is a Symptom of Patriarchy:

Colonialism is a product and symptom of Patriarchy’s addiction to masculine insecurity breeding and consumption wars. Colonialism, whether it is the colonialism of Europeans conquering African tribes, or the colonialism of African tribes who conquered other African tribes, or the colonialism of both Europeans and Africans who conquered the gender balanced Bushmen tribes. All Colonialism, whether it was Genghis Khan, or Shaka Zulu, or Mohammed, is a product and symptom of Patriarchy.

A patriarchal society, or a society which does not address the causes of masculine insecurity, cannot and will not ever be sustainable. Any ideology, whether political or religious, founded upon masculine insecurity (patriarchy) will result in (a) breeding and consumption war concepts of power and domination (to provide insecure males with social/psychological penis extension status symbols, their fragile ego’s lack).

Consumption wars require exponential expropriation of land, natural resources and knowledge. Breeding wars require a war against sustainable consciousness (ecological and political balance) and a human factory farming war economy racket culling. Colonialism is a symptom of Patriarch’s addiction to breeding and consumption wars; i.e. consuming above carrying capacity, and then using the surplus population as cannon fodder to conquer another culture’s resources.

If your argument is that Apartheid and European colonialism is morally reprehensible, and had massive destructive psychological and physical consequences for the tribes conquered; then that is a very valid argument. However, if you want to be honourable and credible, then you must also admit that all Patriarchal colonialism is morally reprehensible, irrespective of who the patriarchal colonialists were who were doing the breeding war, consumption war conquering; including the patriarchal colonialism practiced by your own ancestors, or current political and cultural leaders!

If you choose to argue that European and Boer colonialism is morally reprehensible, while ignoring those of your own ancestors, or cultural or political leaders, then not only is that a dishonourable argument, from a man suffering from fragile ego, but in doing so, you are – in fact – using colonialist patriarchal methods of argument. You are attempting to colonize the argument, by excusing the actions of your own ancestors/leaders, and demanding that other patriarchal colonialists – in this case Europeans – be held to a different higher standard.

That is what patriarchal colonialists do, whether it is physical, or psychological, or emotional, or cultural or religious: They do not have one standard by which they evaluate and judge the actions of all individuals from all cultures. They excuse their own colonial conquering (whether it is the Cape of Good Hope, or an argument in a debate, they want to win by stealth), but demand others the right to conquer.

If you object to Colonialism (the symptom of Patriarchal culture’s) and want a world where one group of people are not constantly being colonized by another group of people, anywhere and everywhere on the planet; then you must be consistent and object to all patriarchy (the root cause of colonialism).

You cannot just object to patriarchal colonialism when your culture or tribe is the one that has been colonized; but endorse patriarchal colonialism when your tribe is doing the patriarchal colonizing of other tribes! If so, you are in such an act endorsing Patriarchal Colonialism, while PRETENDING TO OPPOSE IT! Put differently, you don’t even have the honesty and integrity to be an honest patriarchal colonialist, and to say ‘hey I support all patriarchal colonialism, let the strongest patriarchal colonialists’ win.

Sustainable Problem Solving vs Unsustainable Violent Colonialism: Patriarchal Capitalism and Communism

There are some who view a superior civilization as one in which the men do not suffer from fragile ego addictions, and can discuss a matter honourably and based upon reason and logic, if or where they find their reasoning to be in error, to admit such, and amend their working hypothesis conclusion…. such a society is capable of problem solving most problems… such as for example the Mosuo culture in SW China who have no murder, no rape, no suicide, no homelessness, no unemployment, who live in harmony with nature.

A gender balanced culture based on logic and reason concludes that we live on a finite resource earth, and hence if we wish to avoid conflict from resource scarcity, then we must consume and reproduce at a level below carrying capacity. Put differently we do not have the right to ‘fuck’ and ‘consume’ to our hearts content. No patriarchal culture on planet earth has ever been based on logic and reason and required their tribe to breed and consume below carrying capacity.

Then you have patriarchal societies/cultures where men suffer from fragile ego’s and are incapable of resolving issues by means of logic and reason. Put differently, they do not want to take control of their penis, either physically, by breeding below carrying capacity, or psychologically, by consume below carrying capacity (social status symbols which psychologically are equivalent to their belief in an extension of their penis/virility). They consider superiority, not superiority of logic and reason and honour and intellect and integrity, but superiority of violence and force.

However they do not have the honour or integrity to admit their addiction to violence as a symptom of their masculine insecurity to evaluate their ‘status’ in terms of honesty or honour. Violence is simply another patriarchal status symbol. It is one of the masculine insecurity social status symbols by which they measure any other patriarchal male’s worth, or another tribe’s superiority/inferiority.

I have large respect for a man who is honest about his view of violence being the pinnacle of any civilization, even though I disagree with them… but at least he is honest, and his enemies know.. that is the measure of his values. He has no regard for ‘rule of law’ or ‘logic and reason’. He settles every dispute with his fists. And when he is beaten by a stronger opponent, he does not turn into a victim and starts whining about how he is now oppressed, since he takes responsibility for his choices; that he lost the game of violence is superiority.

I have no respect, and a huge amount of disgust for men who do not have the honour and integrity to admit that they measure a culture’s superiority by the level of its inflicted violence, happy to be earning the fruit of the culture’s colonialist violence, while their violence is winning the raping, pillaging wars, breeding and consuming wars… but all of a sudden turning into whining victims when they lose the game of violence and are now oppressed.

To test whether a man or woman support violence as superiority; or rule of law/reason and logic, ask them whether they procreate and consume below carrying capacity. If they do, they support rule of law/reason and logic. If they consume or procreation above carrying capacity, they support – consciously or unconsciously – patriarchy’s definition of superiority: violence!

Either you support the rule of law, i.e. logic and reason, which means you must confront that we live on a finite resource planet, and all tribes must breed and consume below carrying capacity, to avoid scarcity and internal or inter-tribal conflict.

Or you support the patriarchal breeding and consuming game of violent superiority. If so, then at least be honest and admit it, and if you lose, don’t whine. Why do you think your patriarchal political and religious and cultural leaders are not having this discussion publicly with all citizens and members of their tribes?

Why are your tribal leaders not asking you simply: Do you want to be a member of a tribe where violence rules, or where reason and logic rules? Why are your patriarchal tribal leaders not requiring you to take personal responsibility for breeding and consuming below carrying capacity? Why are your patriarchal tribal leaders encouraging you to breed and consume above carrying capacity? Why do you think the only person willing to discuss this matter with you, and raise your consciousness about it, is a member of a gender balanced culture?

By now you should have come to the realization that both Capitalism and Communism are patriarchal ideologies. Both capitalism and communism ignore the logic and reason of ecological limits, which require the men in their societies to take personal responsibility for procreating and consuming below carrying capacity. Industrial civilization – whether capitalist or communist – is patriarchal in its deliberate refusal to produce, consume and reproduce below finite resource carrying capacity limits.

— Excerpt: 05 April 2013: YCLSA ‘racist’ complaint to SAHRC: Varsity News: Is Love Colour Blind?

* ~~~~~~~ * * ~~~~~~~ * * ~~~~~~~ * * ~~~~~~~ *

Updated: 29 Feb 2016:

* ~~~~~~~ * * ~~~~~~~ * * ~~~~~~~ * * ~~~~~~~ *

Quite simply: Do you know of any Muslim and African military, political, corporate or religious leader; or any of their European military, corporate, political or religious white guilt liberal Masonic slavemasters who thinks that Muslims and/or Africans are intellectually, religiously and/or physically capable of conquering thier ego’s and penis/vagina’s to practice Ecology of Peace responsible freedom procreation practices.

I doubt it. I imagine if the majority of Muslim and African military, political, corporate or religious leaders were brutally honest with their Muslim and/or African followers they would tell them: When it comes to your breeding practices; you are not equal to the average white man or woman; you are not even equal to many animals in the wild who are capable of practicing responsible freedom procreation practices and do not breed like cockroaches on viagra. When it comes to procreation equality; the majority of Muslims and Africans could be equal to cockroaches; except for the fact that cockroaches don’t pretend they want to be called ‘humans’.

Imagine there were one or more, a dozen or a few dozen such Muslim and African military, political, corporate or religious leaders who wanted to or were willing to be brutally honest with their Muslim and/or African followers about adopting a ‘jihad / struggle’ to conquer thier own penis/vagina’s and start to breed like humans not cockroaches on viagra; what would be the response of these Muslim and African’s white guilt two faced liberal Masonic European corporate, political and particularly media slavemasters?

Hysterical screeching of ‘Uncle Tom’ [ http://bit.ly/1GGLmDT ] or ‘racist’ or ‘islamophobic’ [ http://bit.ly/1GGLwuY ] ?

The Masonic Euro Occidental Masonic liberal slavemasters and their Masonic Muslim and African House Nigger slavemasters would prefer not to have a brutally honest racial, cultural, religous Ecology of Peace Referendum international law social contract ‘Ecology of Peace actions and words’ discussion about procreation and consumption practices with regard to resource war: poverty, crime, racism, nazism, zionism, etc. [http://bit.ly/1BEdnoR]

They would prefer it if Masonic Conservative ‘Neo Nazi / Uncle Tom’s’ etc would rather simply act as their ‘Neo Nazi / Uncle Tom’ house nigger cannon fodder; to exterminate all their Euro Occidental Masonic Muslim and African house nigger slaves; so that the Euro Occidental liberals can steal those Africans and Muslims resources; and continue thier plausible deniable Masonic Fuck Fuck shop shop games.

Excerpt: EoP v WiP NWO negotiations Comm Corr [PDF]: 30 March: Press TV.

* ~~~~~~~ * * ~~~~~~~ *

Mother Nature’s Fine Print:

“Education is when you read the fine print. Experience is what you get if you don’t.” – Pete Seeger; AvantGardens.

Put simply the motto of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract can be summarized as following:

Ecology of Peace factual reality simple justice legal language terminology:

Ecology of Peace Facts Reality: (a) Earth is not flat; (b) Earth renewable and non-renewable resources are finite; (c) When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource conflict; (d) To sustainably protect and conserve natural resources in accordance to local and national carrying capacity limits; and restrict national and international inter-cultural, racial and religious resource war conflict; humans must reform and/or abolish the Masonic War is Peace international law social contract; and cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract that restricts all the worlds citizens, from all races, religions and classes; to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits.

In God’s ‘Religions of Peace’ commandment language terminology:

“Humans who are members of Religions of Peace shall advocate on behalf of, legislate, enforce and obey laws which support the implementation of an international law social contract that require humans from all races, religions, classes and cultures to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits.”

In David Eden Lane’s ‘14 words’ terminology:

“Humans – from whatever race, religion, class or culture – who value responsible freedom, honour, justice and their racial, religious or cultural posterity; must cooperate to legally protect the natural capital foundation of all life for all species; by implementing an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; that restricts all of earths citizens procreation and consumption to below ecological carrying capacity limits; thereby securing the indefinite existence future of earth’s natural capital foundation and by extension the resource foundation for all responsible freedom cooperating humans from all races, classes, and religions.”

In EoP Axis Ishmael Earth First – In a race war; I’m on the side of the bears –radicalconservativeredbutton  speak Nature Bats Last terminology:

“If the economy / your bible / Koran / Torah / Talmud / Masonic Constitution is more important to you than the environment; try holding your breath; while you count your money / read your bible / Koran / Torah / Talmud / Masonic Constitution; and tell me what is more important to your survival: protecting the ecological natural capital foundation of life: our air, water and food by implementing an international social contract that restricts everyone’s breeding and consumption to ecological carrying capacity limits; so that all species on Earth can continue breathing, drinking clean water; and having organic food to eat; or counting your money / reading your Bible / Koran / Torah / Talmud / Masonic Constitution.” –  amended quote of Guy McPherson; who coined the term ‘Near Term Extinction’ [NTE] which he writes about on his blog: Nature Bats Last.

Honourable civil factual reality problem solving focused; legal race war conversation:

If there is to be a civil war conversation that we have not had before; let it be a legal verbal In Your Face honourable one.

If we have any desire to create an alternative future, it is only going to happen through a shift in our language. If we want a change in culture, for example, the work is to change the conversation–or, more precisely, to have a legal conversation that we have not had before, one that has the power to create something new in the world. [Werner Erhard: Culture change requires a conversation we have not had before]

“Unlike plagues of the dark ages or contemporary diseases we do not yet understand, the modern plague of overpopulation is soluble by means we have discovered and with resources we possess. What is lacking is not sufficient knowledge of the solution but universal consciousness of the gravity of the problem and education of the billions who are its victims. The only way our overpopulation and overconsumption problems can be solved. First the white man and the black man have to be able to sit down at the same table. The white man has to be able to feel free to speak his mind without worrying about hurting the feelings of the negro. The socalled negro has to feel free to speak his mind without worrying about hurting the feelings of the white man. The soldiers have to be able to feel free to speak their minds without worrying about hurting the feelings of the civilians. The civilians have to feel free to speak their minds without hurting the feelings of the soldiers. Then they can bring the EoP v WiP issues that are under the rug out on top of the table and take an intelligent approach to get the problem solved” [Amended: Martin Luther King: Margaret Sanger Human Rights Award Acceptance Speech 1966; Malcolm X: Make it Plain;]

In Garrett Hardin’s: Living on a Lifeboat and Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor; the basic access to resources leadership decision was ‘nations resource lifeboat is not full yet, whom of those drowning in the water; should we give the opportunity to get into our national lifeboat; and whom should we just allow to drown’. In US Army’s Equal Opportunity Leaders Shrinking Lifeboat Ethics course; while not explicitly stated in the course material; that – in terms of ecological overshoot resource depletion tipping points and resource conflict – all nations on Earth’s resource lifeboats are not only full; but shrinking  so now the decision is not ‘whom to let in’ but ‘whom should be removed from the lifeboat aka national genepool; how should they be removed; how many should be removed; by whom and when should they be removed’? [EoP v WiP NWO negotiations PDF: US Army Reserve Command Ft Bragg NC]

Are USA v Aamon Bundy parties willing to change the conversation; to have a conversation that has not been had before; to have a conversation about – ecological overshoot resource depletion tipping points and resource conflict – national resource shrinking lifeboats decision-making about ‘whom should be removed from the lifeboat aka national genepool; how should they be removed; how many should be removed; by whom and when should they be removed’?

Do you sincerely want a change in Masonic War is Peace divide and conquer rule of force – pretend we give a fuck about economic inequality; psycho-social resource conflict conformity pressures; climate change, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, corporate and political corruption; nation states standing army or dissident guerrilla army ‘terrorism’ resource war military aggression, etc; while doing sweet fuck all about the root ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ international law social contract clauses – culture?

For a comparative difference between Ecology of Peace ‘responsible freedom’ and War is Peace ‘slavery freedumb’ definitions; see: EoP v WiP culture War » original MILED signup page.

Excerpt: EoP Axis NWO Negotiations: USA v Ammon Bundy et al [PDF]

* ~~~~~~~ * * ~~~~~~~ *

Hubert Humphrey: Beauty and Problem Solving:

Statement about beauty and problem solving made to Hubert Humphrey on 25 Feb 1969:

“I won’t get specific; nothing here has been specific till now. But I am going to ask something that I think is basic. The thing that stood out ‘you said people are going around saying ‘they are beautiful’ when you know they really are not. That’s not what its all about. People aren’t beautiful because of how they look and if you don’t understand that; you are not going to start solving any of these problems.” – Unknown 1st statement/question to Hubert Humphrey at UCLA on 25 February 1969 [~ 44:00] Timothy Truthseeker: Humbert Humphrey speaking at UCLA 2/25/1969.

Excerpt: EoP v WiP NWO negotiations Comm Corr [PDF]: 01 Feb: Freemasons for Dummies

* ~~~~~~~ * * ~~~~~~~ *

Nash Equation: Beauty and Cooperative Problem Solving: Re Hitler, Stalin, etc:

The principle of cooperation to implement an Ecology of Peace international law as opposed to competition over resources that I use in my Ecology of Peace Facts summary; is based upon the Nash Equilibrium mathematical principles that John Nash [A Brilliant Madness: A Mathematical Genius Descent into Madness] won a Nobel Prize for Economics upon. Put simply: That in any conflict; those who cooperate to share resources and resolve the root causes of the conflict; would have a better chance of success and winning the fight; than those who say ‘the strongest’ shall win all the resources; and have the right to enslave the weakest.

In the Beautiful Mind movie; John describes this mathematics theory of cooperation to his student friends in a bar; like this.

They are sitting in a bar and in walks a beautiful blond Aryan woman; and they all start getting ready to fight each other to take her on a date; and John Nash laughs and tells them: Why fight about the few women you consider to be physically beautiful in appearance; instead of redefining beauty and cooperating to help all women to become beautiful in character. If you fight for a few physically beautiful women; only a few men will win a beautiful woman; if you redefine beauty in terms of character; you can then cooperate to help all women to grow beautiful characters; then every man in the process helps his own character; and goes home with a beautiful woman.

Similarly if humans cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; then all the energy that is currently wasted by individuals, religions and races to fight over resources will no longer need to be wasted on resources; and humans will have more time and resources to investigate ideas such as whether God does or does not exist; or any other issue of concern they are interested in investigating to seek the truth about reality; but currently cannot do so; because they are just joining one or other religion for ethnic or religious tribal resource war purposes; in their Planet of the Apes fight for survival.

Imagine if Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin had invited Mao Tse-tun, Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Neville Chamberlain to meet and discuss options for pooling their military resources to pressure the international legal community to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; for the benefit of all individuals from all races, classes and religions interested in Ecology of Peace responsible freedom?

Imagine if Nelson Mandela and the ANC had invited Hendrik Verwoerd and the National Party to meet and discuss options for leading the world towards an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; by working together to implement an Ecology of Peace social contract for an ethical responsible freedom South Africa?

Imagine if America’s Billionaires invited each other; and other nations billionaires to meet and discuss options for cooperating to use Bilderberg, World Economic Forum etc conferences to educate the public in buck stops here language about ecological carrying capacity limits; to lead the world towards an Ecology of Peace international law social contract?

Imagine if Ted Turner, Rupert Murdoch and the worlds television and newspaper publishers invited each other; and other nations Fortune 500 Corporate Capitalist Rape the Planet Propaganda Editors to meet and discuss options for cooperating to educate the public in buck stops here language on their television news channels and newspapers about ecological carrying capacity limits; to lead the world towards an Ecology of Peace international law social contract?

Not difficult: Every single article or interview that is published that includes any aspect of the – poverty, unemployment, war, crime, violence, food shortages, food price increases, inflation, police brutality, political instability, loss of civil rights, vanishing species, garbage and pollution, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, etc — consequences of living under a Masonic War is Peace international law social contract; includes a final paragraph at the end of the article; to educate their readers how to support their editors and journalists to create a better future for all citizens from all races, religions, classes interested in responsible freedom:

Editors Notice to Reader: The problems of poverty, unemployment, war, crime, violence, food shortages, food price increases, inflation, police brutality, political instability, loss of civil rights, vanishing species, garbage and pollution, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, racism, sexism, Nazism, Islamism, feminism, Zionism etc; are direct consequences of humans living in accordance to a Masonic War is Peace international law social contract that provides humans the ‘right to breed and consume’ with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits. Ecology of Peace factual reality: 1. Earth is not flat; 2. Resources are finite; 3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource conflict; 4. To sustainably protect and conserve natural resources in accordance to local and national carrying capacity limits; and restrict national and international inter-cultural resource war conflict; humans must implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits. This newspaper calls on all our readers to support us to educate all of the worlds citizens about the consequences of living under a Masonic War is Peace international law social contract; and how we can cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract to create a better future for all citizens from all races, religions, classes interested in responsible freedom.

Excerpt: EoP v WiP NWO negotiations: Comments Corr [PDF: 11 Nov: McChrystal Group]

* ~~~~~~~ * * ~~~~~~~ *

 

sqs-bg_gg-m_900x34