24 Oct: Homer Lea Research Center, Homer Lea Site: EoP Amended Quote of Homer Lea; Response to Lawrence Kaplane Re: Bio Homer Lea ref to The Swarming of the Slavs

* Lawrence Kaplan .. Erik Prince
* 24 Oct: Homer Lea Research Center, Homer Lea Site: EoP Amended Quote of Homer Lea; Response to Lawrence Kaplane Re: Bio Homer Lea ref to The Swarming of the Slavs..
* 25 Oct: Homer Lea Research Center, Homer Lea Site: Draft of EoP Homer Lea bio; STRATINT; credible experts; psych researchers fear of context.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub / EoP NWO SCO: EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Psych, EoP v WiP Media; EoP v WiP Academia; EoP v WiP Law / Military Gospel / EoP v WiP Neg.
sqs-bg_gg-m_900x34

From: Lawrence M. Kaplan <larsk@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 9:36 PM
Subject: Re: Homer Lea Website Contact Request
To: eop.miled.clerk@gmail.com

Andrea,

Thank you for the information.  Whoever wrote the short biography of Homer Lea in the last sentence is mistaken about “The Swarming of the Slav.”  Homer Lea never intended to write a book with that tile.

Sincerely,

Lawrence M. Kaplan

On 10/23/2016 3:13 PM, Form Processor wrote:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Form Name       : Homerlea.org Contact Form
Date Submitted  : 10/23/2016 15:13:11 PM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Full Name::
Andrea Muhrrteyn

Email Address::
eop.miled.clerk@gmail.com

Organization/Company:
EoP Amended Quote of Homer Lea

Questions/Comments::
The following EoP Amended quote of Homer Lea; and Homer Lea Research Center link are referenced at: EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 23 Oct: South China Morning Post .. Pentacon
http://eop-v-wip-nwo-neg-cc.blogspot.co.za/2016/10/23-oct-south-china-morning-post-pentacon.html

“To free a nation from error is to enlighten the individual, and only to the degree that the individual will be receptive of truth can a nation be free from that vanity which ends with national ruin. ….. Investigation shows that whenever two nations have become engaged in warfare they have been advancing on converging lines of (resource acquisition for growing consumption or procreation) self-interest and aggrandizement. When the contact takes place, the struggle for supremacy, or even survival is at hand. This inevitable hour is approximately fixed and determined by the angles of convergence plus the sum of the relative (consumption / breeding war) speed by which the nations are moving along their respective lines. Thus it is that, when the angle of (breeding / consumption war) convergence of both or even one of the nations is acute and the speed or progress along one or both of the converging lines correspondingly great, war results in a few years or decades.” – EoP
Amended quote from Valour of Ignorance; by Homer Lea as quoted at Military Gospel according to Homer Lea. Homer Lea  was the white American Chief of Staff, soldier of fortune military adviser to Chinese revolutionary leader Dr. Sun Yat-sen during the 1911 Chinese Republican Revolution; author of Valour of Ignorance, The Day of the Saxon, The Vermilion Pencil made into a play named the Crimson Spider; and The Swarming of the Slavs.

.

sqs-bg_gg-m_450x26

From: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 3:35 AM
Subject: Response to Lawrence Kaplan Re: Bio Homer Lea ref to The Swarming of the Slavs
To: “Homer Lea Research Center: Lawrence M. Kaplan” <larsk@verizon.net>
Cc: Roger Yung Homer Lea Site <rogeryung@homerleasite.com>

TO: Homer Lea Research Center: Lawrence M. Kaplan (larsk@verizon.net)
CC: Roger Yung Homer Lea Site (rogeryung@homerleasite.com)

Response to Lawrence Kaplan Re: Bio Homer Lea ref to The Swarming of the Slavs

Re: “Thank you for the information”. No problem. Hope it was useful.

Re: “Whoever wrote the short biography of Homer Lea in the last sentence is mistaken about “The Swarming of the Slav.”  Homer Lea never intended to write a book with that tile.”

I wrote the short biography of Homer Lea in the last sentence; which included the following links in the full response at the EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 23 Oct: South China Morning Post .. Pentacon link.

EoP Amended quote from Valour of Ignorance; by Homer Lea as quoted at Military Gospel according to Homer Lea. Homer Lea  was the white American Chief of Staff, soldier of fortune military adviser toChinese revolutionary leader Dr. Sun Yat-sen during the 1911 Chinese Republican Revolution; author of Valour of Ignorance, The Day of the Saxon, The Vermilion Pencil made into a play named the Crimson Spider; and The Swarming of the Slavs.

I don’t know if Homer Lea intended to write a book that may have been named ‘The Swarming of the Slavs’; that information I read at Roger Yung’s Homer Lea Site; at the Books Link; which states:

The Swarming of the Slavs – This could have been the title of his last planned book. Indeed, Lea was gathering data and materials through Dr. Sun’s secretary, Chockman, and other sources. One month before his death, Lea confirmed that work on his manuscript had  not advanced satisfactorily. He was in the process of outlining the structure of his book. Due to his illness in the recent months he was not able to continue his literary work as he could  have.

This book would follow the theme of his last two books, which mainly dealt with the growing power ofRussia and its impact on the other great powers. Lea predicted that Russia would invade Afghanistan orIran. If Britain and American were to win their wars with Germany and Japan, they would have to confront Russia eventually. He forecasted Russia’s global role before the Communist Revolution almost a decade in advance. Lea had warned it would be a threat to the interests of United States as well asChina’s, if Russia would become involved with China.

I am happy to correct information about the Swarming of the Slavs; if Roger is provided with information that his information as inaccurate.

However in terms of accuracy; it could read more accurately as Homer Lea was the white American Chief of Staff, soldier of fortune military adviser to Chinese revolutionary leader Dr. Sun Yat-sen during the 1911 Chinese Republican Revolution; and the published author of Valour of Ignorance, The Day of the Saxon, The Vermilion Pencil made into a play named the Crimson Spider; and unpublished last planned book which could have been titled, The Swarming of the Slavs.

If so: thanks for accuracy editing help.

EoP v WiP Neg updates pending reinstatement of deleted EoP weebly websites.

A copy of prior correspondence was documented at EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 23 Oct: South China Morning Post .. Pentacon.

EoP v WiP negotiations were – and if the hacked and deleted weebly account is reinstated; prior to termination of EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations, as a result of Planetary elite’s preference for Masonic War is Peace orgy of violence; will again be – updated at: MILED Clerk Notice.

Pending reinstatement of EoP accounts on Weebly: A copy of this correspondence is documented at: (A) SQSwans PRHEoP v WiP NWO Neg CC and/or EoP Axis; (B) EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations: Comments Correspondence [PDF]: Homer Lea Research Center, Homer Lea Site.

Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn [EoP Oath PDF]
PO Box 5042, George East, 6539, RSA
GMC 4643-13 & 2578-14 Pro Se Applicant
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk

.

sqs-bg_gg-m_450x26

From: <larsk@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: Response to Lawrence Kaplan Re: Bio Homer Lea ref to The Swarming of the Slavs
To: eop.miled.clerk@gmail.com

Lara,

You need to be careful about researching Homer Lea on the internet.  Roger Yung is not a trained historian and has his own opinions about Homer Lea. Unfortunately he has included undocumented/hearsay information on his website that is inaccurate and misleading.  I have unsuccessfully tried advising him about correcting these errors.  That said, there is no reliable documentation that Lea ever planning writing a book entitled “The Swarming of the Slav.” That myth began in 1922 when a Los Angeles Times journalist mentioned it in a news article. Shortly before Lea died, he gave a news interview to a reporter and that explained his next book would focus on democracy and the inter-relations of world powers.  I recommend you revise your biographical sentence to read:

Homer Lea, a Caucasian American writer, was best known as a soldier of fortune and militaryadviser to Chinese revolutionary leader Dr. Sun Yat-sen during the 1911 ChineseRepublican Revolution.  As an author, his most well known works included, “The Vermilion Pencil,” a popular romance novel about China, and “The Valor of Ignorance” and “The Dayof the Saxon,” part of a three volume trilogy that focused on American and British defense issues, respectively. Lea died in 1912 before he could complete the third volume of his trilogy that would have examined democracy and the inter-relations of world powers.
Sincerely,
Lawrence Kaplan

.

sqs-bg_gg-m_450x26

Edit Note: Added: EoP Applicants [PDF]: David Petraeus, Erik Prince; EoP Axis: Intnl Psych [PDF]
From: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 2:43 PM
Subject: Draft of EoP Homer Lea bio; STRATINT; credible experts; psych researchers fear of context
To: “Homer Lea Research Center: Lawrence M. Kaplan” <larsk@verizon.net>, Roger Yung Homer Lea Site <rogeryung@homerleasite.com>
Cc: Dr John Breeding <jbreeding2@austin.rr.com>, Ivan Alexander <humancafe@aol.com>, Psychiatric Drug Facts <psychiatricdrugfacts@hotmail.com>, “Oxford: Psych: Iain McGilchrist” <iain.mcgilchrist@all-souls.ox.ac.uk>, “West Cork Mental Health Services: Pat Bracken” <info@recoveryourmentalhealth.com>, Rodri Huws <r.huws@sheffield.ac.uk>, “PrimalTherapy: Arthur Janov” <primalctr@mac.com>, “Models of Madness: John Read” <j.read@auckland.ac.nz>, “They Say Youre Crazy: Paula Caplan” <Paulacaplan@post.harvard.edu>, “Schizophrenia a Scientific Delusion: Mary Boyle” <c.wickham@uel.ac.uk>, Jim Orford <j.f.orford@bham.ac.uk>,“Users and Abusers of Psychiatry: Lucy Johnstone” <L.C.Johnstone@bristol.ac.uk>, “Whores of the Court: Margaret Hagen” <margaretahagen@gmail.com>, David Petraeus <david.petraeus@kkr.com>, “Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co: Henry Kravis” <kravh@kkr.com>, “Williams & Connolly LLP: Robert Barnett” <rbarnett@wc.com>, “Erik Prince: Frontier Services Group” <info@fsgroup.com>, “Counsel: Victoria Toensing” <dt@digenovatoensing.com>, “GOP: Brown Ellen – Inhofe” <Ellen_Brown@inhofe.senate.gov>, “Michigan Republicans: Sam Bissell” <SBissell@migop.org>

TO: Homer Lea Research Center: Lawrence M. Kaplan (larsk@verizon.net)
TO: Roger Yung Homer Lea Site (rogeryung@homerleasite.com)
Ref: EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 23 Oct: South China Morning Post .. Pentacon.

CC: EoP Applicants: David Petraeus & Erik Prince
Ref: EoP Axis: 22 Oct: David Petraeus & Erik Prince: EoP App strategic path foundation of Pro-EoP Applicant or Pro WiP American.

CC: WiP Critical Psychiatry Experts
Ref: Prof Mary Boyle: Is clinical psychology fearful of social context?. Why we might be, why it matters and what we might do about it.

WiP Critical Psychiatry Experts:
Dr John Breeding (jbreeding2@austin.rr.com); Ivan Alexander (humancafe@aol.com); Psychiatric Drug Facts (psychiatricdrugfacts@hotmail.com); Oxford: Psych: Iain McGilchrist (iain.mcgilchrist@all-souls.ox.ac.uk); West Cork Mental Health Services: Recover Your Mental Health: Pat Bracken (info@recoveryourmentalhealth.com); Rodri Huws (r.huws@sheffield.ac.uk); PrimalTherapy: Arthur Janov (primalctr@mac.com); Toxic Psychiatry: Peter Breggin (psychiatricdrugfacts@hotmail.com); Models of Madness: John Read (j.read@auckland.ac.nz); They Say Youre Crazy: Paula Caplan (Paulacaplan@post.harvard.edu); Schizophrenia a Scientific Delusion: Mary Boyle (c.wickham@uel.ac.uk); Jim Orford (j.f.orford@bham.ac.uk); Users and Abusers of Psychiatry: Lucy Johnstone (L.C.Johnstone@bristol.ac.uk); Whores of the Court: Margaret Hagen (margaretahagen@gmail.com)

David Petraeus & Erik Prince
David Petraeus (david.petraeus@kkr.com); Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co: Henry Kravis (kravh@kkr.com); Williams & Connolly LLP: Robert Barnett (rbarnett@wc.com); Erik Prince: Frontier Services Group (info@fsgroup.com); Counsel: Victoria Toensing (dt@diGenovaToensing.com); GOP: Brown Ellen – Inhofe (Ellen_Brown@inhofe.senate.gov); Michigan Republicans: Sam Bissell (SBissell@migop.org)

Draft of EoP Homer Lea bio; STRATINT; credible experts; psych researchers fear of context

* Summary of Updated draft of Homer Lea biography summary decision-making
* Researching Homer Lea
* Credible — Homer Lea; or other topic —  expert
* Off the cuff summary of EoP perspective of credible expert ethics characteristics:
* EoP v Homer Lea Strategic Intelligence Goals:
* Psychology Researchers confront their fear of confronting context in their research

Updated draft of Homer Lea biography summary:

Most recent EoP draft of Homer Lea biography with feedback from Lawrence Kaplan:

Homer Lea, a Caucasian American writer, was best known as the white American Chief of Staff, soldier of fortune military adviser to Chinese revolutionary leader Dr. Sun Yat-sen during the 1911 Chinese Republican Revolution. As a published author, his most well known works included, “The Vermilion Pencil,” a popular romance novel about China, made into a play named the Crimson Spider; and “The Valor of Ignorance” and “The Dayof the Saxon,” part of a three volume trilogy that focused on American and British defense issues, respectively. Lea died in 1912 before he could complete the third volume of his trilogy — – which according to Homer Lea researcher Roger Yung, but disputed by Homer Lea researcher Lawrence Kaplan — could have been titled, The Swarming of the Slavs — that would have examined democracy and the inter-relations of world powers.

Response to Lawrence Kaplan’s constructive criticism editing suggestions on Homer Lea biography:

I am not researching Homer Lea off or on the internet; nor have I ever pretended to be researching Homer Lea. I don’t care if Roger Yung is a trained historian or a self taught historian. I care if he – or anyone – is a sincere truthseeker researcher.

It is quite possible that Roger Yung has according to subjectively held information and evidence available to him; included what you consider to be “undocumented/hearsay information”; based upon subjectively held information and evidence available to you.

Roger Yung does provide a clear caveat on his Homer Lea Site front page regarding his Homer Lea research on his website; which clearly informs any reader that:

If you want to know more about Homer Lea, the information you receive may be confusing, incomplete, and contradictory, perhaps even fraudulent and controversial. …. Many historians will not touch the subject. If we keep an open mind and are willing to explore through open discussion, we will be able to piece together a more complete picture of this rather enigmatical man. …. As you walk through each web page, one attempts to answer the same puzzling question – Who is Homer Lea? If you can look at the whole picture, the people, the time, the milieu surrounding him, one may be at a loss for words attempting to describe the entire man and what he stood for.

Perhaps the information you provided Roger was not sufficiently evidentiary for him to consider worthy of correcting what you consider his errors. Perhaps he is not sincerely interested in truthseeking; or perhaps there are other reasons.

In the absence of knowing Homer Lea related (i) facts that you both agree upon; (ii) the evidence and information you both hold, and your decision-making in terms of arriving at your particular working hypotheis conclusion interpretation of such facts; I am not able to provide you with my subjective interpretation of whose ‘interpretation’ is more accurate or logical or reasonable.

If you are buck stops here truthseekers engaged in finding the truth about Homer Lea; then you may be able to cooperate and find the facts; which you can agree upon; although your interpretation of such facts may be different; and if you are honourable men; you can agree to disagree on that particular Homer Lea issue in dispute; until you have more buck stops here facts; and still cooperate on other Homer Lea research issues.

If at some point in time you make a decision that both of you are buck stops here truthseekers about the issue; and you cannot come to agreement about whose interpretation is more accurate; you can find an impartial truthseekign arbitration expert – i.e. whose truthseeking on any issue is based upon ‘truth the whole truth and nothinb but the truth, based upon the evidence, the whole evidence and nothing but the evidence’; irrespective of whether the truth offends Homer Lea researchers and or anyone else — to provide you with their interpretation as to whose interpretation they consider more accurate or reasonable.

The biographic sentence of Homer Lea that I authored; is not of major importance to the issues that I am researching; as long as it is accurate in simple english a village idiot can understand; I am happy with it.

Here follows more detailed info on Updated draft of Homer Lea biography summary decision-making

Re: Researching Homer Lea:

I am not researching Homer Lea off or on the internet; nor have I ever pretended to be researching Homer Lea.

I and others, have been researching the root cause of the majority of socio-economic and political problems resulting from resource depletion and resource wars: including among others: climate change, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, climate change, terrorism, feminism, nazism, Islamism, capitalism, communism, militarization of police, etc.

We have identified the root causes as the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ Masonic War is Peace clauses of international law; and are busy in EoP v WiP NWO Negotitions enquiry to determine what if any military, legal, political, religious, racial will there is for cooperating to nullify the Masonic War is Peace ‘right to breed and consume’ clauses of international law; and replace them with Ecology of Peace clauses that restrict all the worlds citizens from all nations, of all races and religions to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; and eliminating violators from the planetary genepool.

That is what I and others; have been researching off and on the internet.

Re: Credible — Homer Lea; or other topic —  expert:

I don’t care if someone is an official historian; ie. licenced by a WiP academic institute; such as yourself; or a self taught historian, such as Roger Yung; an official soldier; i.e. licenced by an official military academic institute; such as General James Cartwright or David Petraeus; or a self taught guerrilla soldier; like Homer Lea.

Off the cuff summary of EoP perspective of credible expert ethics characteristics:

My concern regarding the credibility of any individual’s – expert or self taught – information; is the quality of their evidence in context; which as far as I can tell is a consequence of their (a) sincere commitment to truthseeking on the particular issue; i.e. when provided with evidence contradicting a particular hypothesis to sincerely investigate it and if proven correct; to take responsibility for admitting their mistake; and (b) to consider their working hypothesis conclusion within context.

An alleged expert who refuses to (a) sincerely consider and examine contrarian evidence, including contextual evidence; (b) admit a mistake; if or when provided with evidence that contradicts a pillar of their evidence upholding their particular working hypothesis conclusion; has an agenda that is not truthseeking, but something else; whether ego careerism, self deception about his commitment to truthseeking, etc.

A ‘problem solving’ expert has additional responsibilities; such as es to (a) enquire into the root causes of the particular problem they are representing themselves as an expert at solving; (b) when root cause problem is discovered, honestly communicate such root cause problem they are alleged experts at solving; (c) once the root cause has been shared with the client; determining whether there is sufficient will to eliminate the root causes of the problem.

If the client is a large organization such as a corporation or state for example; the problem solving issue is more complicated; and depends on numerous factors; such as for example: will of the ‘strategic decision-maker’; their advisors, etc.

If a problem solving experts individual client is not sincere about problem solving the particular problem; a sincere problem solving expert should confront the client with the possibility that they are not sincere; but only engaged in a bullshit the public relations image management exercise; and if the client is not wiling to demonstrate their sincere commitment to problem solving; terminate their problem solving expertise towards such client as not being sincerely interested in problem solving their particular problem; until such client changes their mind, if ever.

Generally speaking such a client would – consciously or unconsciously — not really want the problem solved, they only want to pretend to be solving the problem, so they can market themelves as an alleged ‘problem solver’ for socio-political or economic profits; while actually unconsciously or consciously deliberately and covertly perpetuating the problem for thier own political and/or economic profits. They are parasitically covertly profiteering off not solving the problem; while overtly and publicly pretending to be concerned about helping to solve the problem.

EoP v Homer Lea Strategic Intelligence Goals:

I did read Homer Lea’s book: Valour of Ignorance; some of which I found very informative; such as my EoP interpretation of Homer Lea’s writings; as published at Military Gospel according to Homer Lea.

“Investigation shows that whenever two nations have become engaged in warfare they have been advancing on converging lines of (resource acquisition for growing consumption or procreation) self-interest and aggrandizement. When the contact takes place, the struggle for supremacy, or even survival is at hand. This inevitable hour is approximately fixed and determined by the angles of convergence plus the sum of the relative (consumption / breeding war) speed by which the nations are moving along their respective lines. Thus it is that, when the angle of (breeding / consumption war) convergence of both or even one of the nations is acute and the speed or progress along one or both of the converging lines correspondingly great, war results in a few years or decades.”

I don’t think my strategic intelligence goals are exactly the same as Homer Lea’s. Similar in some aspects; yes, but identical; I don’t think so. That is not to say that there is not much that I can learn from the lessons he learnt, his experience; as I can from anyone else; particularly their willingness to confront themselves and admit their mistakes.

“To free a nation from error is to enlighten the individual, and only to the degree that the individual will be receptive of truth can a nation be free from that vanity which ends with national ruin.” – Homer Lea

**

“It is necessary for you to learn from other’s mistakes. You will not live long enough to make them all yourself.” — Eleanor Roosevelt and/or Admiral Hyman Rickover.

**

“An academic reactor or reactor plant almost always has the following basic characteristics: (1) It is simple. (2) It is small. (3) It is cheap. (4) It is light. (5) It can be built very quickly. (6) It is very flexible in purpose (“omnibus reactor”). (7) Very little development is required. It will use mostly “off-the-shelf” components. (8) The reactor is in the study phase. It is not being built now.

“On the other hand, a practical reactor plant can be distinguished by the following characteristics: (1) It is being built now. (2) It is behind schedule. (3) It is requiring an immense amount of development on apparently trivial items. Corrosion, in particular, is a problem. (4) It is very expensive. (5) It takes a long time to build because of the engineering development problems. (6) It is large. (7) It is heavy. (8) It is complicated.

“The tools of the academic-reactor designer are a piece of paper and pencil with an eraser. If a mistake is made, it can always be erased and changed. If the practical-reactor designer errs, he wears the mistake around his neck; it cannot be erased. Everyone can see it.

“The academic-reactor designer is a dilettante. He has not had to assume any real responsibility in connection with his projects. He is free to luxuriate in elegant ideas, the practical shortcomings of which can be relegated to the category of “mere technical details.” The practical-reactor designer must live with these same technical details. Although recalcitrant and awkward, they must be solved and cannot be put off until tomorrow. Their solutions require manpower, time and money.”

— Admiral Hyman Rickover; Letter from H.G Rickover [PDF] via Wikipedia;

**

It is a human inclination to hope things will work out, despite evidence or doubt to the contrary. A successful manager must resist this temptation. This is particularly hard if one has invested much time and energy on a project and thus has come to feel possessive about it. Although it is not easy to admit what a person once thought correct now appears to be wrong, one must discipline himself to face the facts objectively and make the necessary changes—regardless of the consequences to himself. The man in charge must personally set the example in this respect. He must be able, in effect, to “kill his own child” if necessary and must require his subordinates to do likewise. I have had to go to Congress and, because of technical problems, recommended terminating a project that had been funded largely on my say-so. It is not a pleasant task, but one must be brutally objective in his work.

— Admiral Hyman Rickover; Doing a Job via Gov Leaders

**

If however two individuals strategic intelligence goals are not the same; then their ultimate strategic intelligence path is different.

Homer Lea was intent on exposing the impending war consequences; but failed to clearly and simply – in buck stops here simple english a village idiot could understand — articulate the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits root causes of overpopulation and overconsumption converging lines of resource acquisition for growing consumption and procreation self-interest and aggrandizement.

To the extent that he was conscious of such failure to clarify the root causes; and advise those he was advising to cooperate with other nations, races and religions to address the root ‘right to breed and consume’ clauses of international law causes of war; to that extent his goals were not to honestly educate about how to end war and implement peace; but ego parasitic profiteering of pretending to solve the ‘war’ problem orientated.

To the extent that he was unconscious of such failure to clarify the root causes; and if someone had confronted him and informed him of such failure and he was (a) receptive to the constructive criticism, enquired into it; and admitted his mistakes; and altered his strategic intelligence goals advisory policy; his strategic intelligence goals would have been root cause problem solving orientated; or (b) not receptive to the constructive criticism, ignored or silenced the constructive criticism; his strategic intelligence goals would have been ego parasitic profiteering of pretending to solve problems orientated.

Its possible nobody ever provided Homer Lea with constructive criticism advise to clearly clarify the root causes of the problem he was allegedly focussed on solving; and engage in an enquiry whether there was sufficient political will to address those root causes; which could be because of many reasons: (a) he did not surround himself with; or had not found or was not even looking for; a or sufficient sincere buck stops here truthseekers to be his advisors (b) of the sincere truthseekers around at that time; on the planet; none of them were focussed on the truthseeking the particular problems Homer Lea was focussed on addressing; and consequently none of them had arrived at the root cause of the problem, and consequently the root cause of the particular problem had not been discovered.

Hence the EoP working hypothesis summary of the difference between EoP and WiP strategic intelligence policy formulators; as stated to Eeben Barlow:

[..] Re: Difference between EoP and WiP Effective Strategists & Policy Formulators:

Masonic War is Peace is about consciously or unconsciously identifying the root cause of the problem, and applying STRATINT to deliberately perpetuate the problem indefinitely so as to socio-politically and financially parastically profit of the misery resulting from the problem. The tap has been left on, the bath is overflowing. Masonic War is Peace profiteers argue about what colour mops to use; who is mopping; who is hiring chinks or japs or coolies to do the mopping, blah blah.

Ecology of Peace identifies the root cause of any problem and applies STRATINT skills to eliminate the root cause of the problem. EoP Applicants [PDF] identified ‘the right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits clauses’ – aka policy — of the Masonic War is Peace international law social contract; as the root cause of the majority of socio-economic and political problems resulting from resource depletion and resource wars: including among others: climate change, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, climate change, terrorism, feminism, nazism, Islamism, capitalism, communism, militarization of police, etc. Ecology of Peace STRATINT advisors simply point out the tap is causing the bath to overflow; and find out who is willing to cooperate to turn off the tap.
— EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations: 20 Sep: Eeben Barlow’s Military and Security Blog: The Dangers of Ignoring Strategic Intelligence.

To the extent that he was unconscious of such failure to clarify the root causes; and if someone had confronted him and informed him of such failure and he was (a) receptive to the constructive criticism, enquired into it; and admitted his mistakes; and altered his strategic intelligence goals advisory policy; his strategic intelligence goals would have been root cause problem solving orientated; or (b) not receptive to the constructive criticism, ignored or silenced the constructive criticism; his strategic intelligence goals would have been ego parasitic profiteering of pretending to solve problems orientated.

Re: Psychology Researchers confront their fear of confronting context in their research:

See for example: Prof Mary Boyle: Is clinical psychology fearful of social context? Why we might be, why it matters and what we might do about it; Standing up and Speaking out about Social Context Division of Clinical Psychology at Glasgow; regarding psychologist experts ‘fear’ of confronting context:

“I got the very powerful impression that Laird and Clark seemed to sense that fully engaging with context would make it much more difficult to pursue their core arguments that the main causes of misery are anxiety and depression. That the major reason for misery’s persistence is how people think; and that a major part of the solution is individual therapy. Now it certainly complicates funding discussions with government; as you can imagine, if they did engage with context. So this brings me to my second question, what is it about confronting well evidenced role of social context; in both the development and the persistence of mental health problems; which seems so difficult even threatening. I think there is quite a few possibilities and I’ll deal with a few briefly. But familiarly over all of them is both our insecurity as a discipline and a profession. So the threats are: Its not science. Its not psychology. Creates feelings of helplessness. Need for acceptance by Psychiatry. Involves telling truth to power. …. Now psychology as a whole is intensely concerned about its academic and social acceptance; as a science. Jim Orford once said “We still suffer from an inferiority complex making us do things just because they appear scientific. So we emphasise our similarity to the biological and natural sciences. We give the highest to the methods of the natural sciences. We are also very preoccupied with avoiding accusations of social and political bias; of being influenced by subjective values; rather than objective facts.” …. Why our avoidance of context matters so much, the major implication is that our theories and research are always potentially influential. Whether we approve it, intend it or whether we are even aware of it; what we say and do will have influence in so far as particular psychological ideas become part of a construction of reality; which can then be drawn on by those with the power to frame social problems and their perceived solutions. … It suggests that when we as psychologists conceptualize people and their problems; it becomes a kind of cultural resource; and above all, a relation to this avoidance of context; I think this model shores how our theories can help maintain the social and economic status-quo. ..  through narratives of justification. Now its often been pointed out that maintaining harmful social practices or inequalities; usually needs some sort of public story; which makes them seem reasonable. And if we look at it from the point of view of those who benefit from inequalities; an especially powerful narrative is one which distracts attention from context; which could help us understand why some groups are persistently disadvantaged or suffering; why their behaviour seems difficult; and instead focuses on mental or biological characteristics; which seem to explain these outcomes. Historically psychology has provided a major role in providing these narratives. … Now it’s important to emphasise that we don’t intend social harm, but our profession simply has to provide the intellectual framework — and of course give it scientific respectability — others will do the rest. … Context also make it much more difficult for those in power to avoid addressing the psychological impact of social and economic policies; and also they are not incompatible with helping individuals. I don’t think its an exageration to say that clinical psychology is at a watershed in terms of who we are and what we stand for.  I hope we will acknowledge that how we relate to social context is absolutely central to those questions; and I also hope we will choose to implement the conference theme in major and very public ways. I think we can be both confident that we have a scientific and ethical mandate, but also I think we may be surprised at just how many allies we would have.””

Both sides of the Masonic War is Peace – namely the ‘mental disorders exist’ and the ‘mental disorders don’t exist, psychiatry is a fraud – divide are afraid of confronting their ‘fear of context’ research mistakes.

In their case including context – such as: could what they call ‘mental disoders’ simply be the canary on the frontlines in the Masonic War is Peace toxic culture coalmine; whose cognitive and behavioural coping mechanisms symptoms of individuals experiencing racial, ideological, class or cultural existential identity and/or resource conflict anxiety resulting from population pressures colliding with declining resources; which are the direct consequences of the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of international law social contract? — in their research for the ‘causes of mental disorder misery; would result in them either (a) admitting their mistakes and enaging in truthseeking research; or (b) ignoring the canaries; covering up their mistakes; and ultimately psychiatry and psychology drive their 500 tonne train over their ‘fuck ecological carrying capacity gravity laws’ ‘matchstick bridge’.

EoP RH Culture Info has more info on EoP culture’s perspective on WiP ‘fuck ecological carrying capacity gravity law’s matchstick bridges.

EoP v WiP Neg updates pending reinstatement of deleted EoP weebly websites.

A copy of prior correspondence to Homer Lea Research Center and Homer Lea Site; was documented at EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 23 Oct: South China Morning Post .. Pentacon.

EoP v WiP negotiations were – and if the hacked and deleted weebly account is reinstated; prior to termination of EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations, as a result of Planetary elite’s preference for Masonic War is Peace orgy of violence; will again be – updated at: MILED Clerk Notice.

Pending reinstatement of EoP accounts on Weebly: A copy of this correspondence is documented at: (A) SQSwans PRHEoP v WiP NWO Neg CC and/or EoP Axis; (B) EoP Applicants [PDF]: David Petraeus, Erik Prince; EoP Axis: Intnl Psych [PDF]; EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations: Comments Correspondence [PDF]: Homer Lea Research Center, Homer Lea Site; Critical Psychology Researchers.

Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn [EoP Oath PDF]
PO Box 5042, George East, 6539, RSA
GMC 4643-13 & 2578-14 Pro Se Applicant
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk

.

sqs-bg_gg-m_900x34