* EoP v WiP NWO Neg: Marco Rubio .. Stan McChrystal
* 19 Jan: M Rubio, R Tillerson: EoP RH Factual Reality and War Criminal Questions
» TO: Mr. Marco Rubio & Mr. Rex Tillerson. CC: United States of America Att Gen & US Navy JAG; Russian Federation: Prosecutor General & Chief Military Prosecutor; Donald Trump 2016 ME WiP Advisors: Center for Security Policy; Luis Moreno Ocampo, International Law: United Nations, US Navy JAG; Erik Prince; Suggested EoP NTE GMA POTUS.
» 20 Jan: Marco Rubio firstname.lastname@example.org returned undelivered; Edit: “Russia and the planet”, correction: “his nation and the planet”.
* CSPAN: Secretary of State Confirmation Hearing, Part 1 Former ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on his nomination to be secretary of state in the Donald Trump administration.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub / EoP NWO SCO: EoP v Nobel, EoP PoW Sub, EoP Cop21, EoP NTE GMA POTUS, EoP Axis MilNec Evac, EoP RH FR, EoP v WiP NWO Neg.
Last Updated: 20 Jan 2017: 19:47 hrs
From: EoP MILED Clerk <email@example.com>
Date: Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 4:05 PM
Subject: M Rubio, R Tillerson: EoP RH Factual Reality and War Criminal Questions
FL Senator Marco Rubio <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Emily Bouck <email@example.com>, Alberto Martinez <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Brooke Sammon <email@example.com>, Luke Killam <Luke_Killam@rubio.senate.gov>, Darren A Achord <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Rex Tillerson via Nancy Gober <email@example.com>
Cc: President Barack Obama <firstname.lastname@example.org>, National Security Division Assistant Attorney General <email@example.com>, “US Navy Judge Advocate General: VADM James W. Crawford III” <JAGIR@navy.mil>, President Vladimir Putin via Kremlin Press Office <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Russian Federation: Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation: General Directorate for International Legal Cooperation” <email@example.com>, Asset Recovery <firstname.lastname@example.org>, International Legal Assistance Office <email@example.com>, Donald Trump 2016 <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Counsel: Donald F McGahn” <email@example.com>, Lt Gen Michael Flynn <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Donald Trump Transition team <email@example.com>, “OK AG: Scott Pruitt” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Gen James Mattis & John F Kelly via FWA Consultants: Flag Officers: Dan LaBert” <email@example.com>, David Friedman <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Center for Security Policy: Frank Gaffney” <email@example.com>, Shaun Seifert <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Kyle Shideler <KShideler@centerforsecuritypolicy.org>, Alex van Ness <email@example.com>, Luis Moreno Ocampo <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “UN: Rule of Law Unit” <email@example.com>, “Dep Sec-General: Jan Eliasson” <Eliasson@un.org>, “Vets4Energy: Veterans Working to Ensure National Security through Energy Security” <RSVP@vets4energy.com>, “RADM John Dudley Hutson: Dean NH Law” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “RADM Michael Franklin Lohr: VP Asst Gen Counsel Boeing” <email@example.com>, “RADM James McPherson: Chairman: National Assoc. of Attorneys General” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “VADM James W. Houck: Int Dean Penn State Law” <email@example.com>, “Erik Prince: Frontier Services Group” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Counsel: Victoria Toensing” <email@example.com>, “GOP: Brown Ellen – Inhofe” <Ellen_Brown@inhofe.senate.gov>, “Michigan Republicans: Sam Bissell” <SBissell@migop.org>, David Petraeus <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Stan McChrystal <email@example.com>
TO: Mr. Marco Rubio & Mr. Rex Tillerson
CC: United States of America Att Gen & US Navy JAG
CC: Russian Federation: Prosecutor General & Chief Military Prosecutor
CC: Donald Trump 2016 ME WiP Advisors: Center for Security Policy
Marco Rubio & Rex Tillerson:
FL Senator Marco Rubio (firstname.lastname@example.org); Emily Bouck (email@example.com); Alberto Martinez (firstname.lastname@example.org); Brooke Sammon (email@example.com); Luke Killam (Luke_Killam@rubio.senate.gov); Darren A Achord (firstname.lastname@example.org); Rex Tillerson via Nancy Gober (email@example.com)
United States of America: President, Att Gen & US Navy JAG:
President Barack Obama (firstname.lastname@example.org); Attorney General Loretta Lynch via National Security Division Assistant Attorney General (email@example.com); US Navy Judge Advocate General: VADM James W. Crawford III (JAGIR@navy.mil).
Russian Federation: President, Prosecutor General & Chief Military Prosecutor:
President Vladimir Putin via Kremlin Press Office (firstname.lastname@example.org); Russian Federation: Prosecutor General Chayka Yury Yakovlevich; Chief Military Prosecutor: Sergey Fridinsky via Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation: General Directorate for International Legal Cooperation (email@example.com); Asset Recovery (firstname.lastname@example.org); International Legal Assistance Office (email@example.com)
Donald Trump 2016 ME WiP Advisors: Center for Security Policy:
Donald Trump 2016 (firstname.lastname@example.org); Counsel: Donald F McGahn (email@example.com); Lt Gen Michael Flynn (firstname.lastname@example.org); Donald Trump Transition team (email@example.com); OK AG: Scott Pruitt (firstname.lastname@example.org); Gen James Mattis & John F Kelly via FWA Consultants: Flag Officers: Dan LaBert (email@example.com); David Friedman (firstname.lastname@example.org); Center for Security Policy: Frank Gaffney (email@example.com); Shaun Seifert (firstname.lastname@example.org); Kyle Shideler (KShideler@centerforsecuritypolicy.org); Alex van Ness (email@example.com)
Luis Moreno Ocampo, International Law: United Nations, US Navy JAG:
Luis Moreno Ocampo (firstname.lastname@example.org); UN: Rule of Law Unit (email@example.com); Dep Sec-General: Jan Eliasson (Eliasson@un.org); US Navy JAG: 1992-1993: RADM William Leon Schachte, Jr. SC Chair of Vets4Energy: Veterans Working to Ensure National Security through Energy Security (RSVP@Vets4Energy.com); 1997-2000: RADM John Dudley Hutson: Dean NH Law (firstname.lastname@example.org); 2002-2004: RADM Michael Franklin Lohr: VP Asst Gen Counsel Boeing (email@example.com); 2004-2006: RADM James McPherson: Chairman: National Assoc. of Attorneys General (firstname.lastname@example.org); 2009-2012: VADM James W. Houck: Int Dean Penn State Law (email@example.com)
Erik Prince: Frontier Services Group (firstname.lastname@example.org); Counsel: Victoria Toensing (dt@diGenovaToensing.com); GOP: Brown Ellen – Inhofe (Ellen_Brown@inhofe.senate.gov); Michigan Republicans: Sam Bissell (SBissell@migop.org)
Suggested EoP NTE GMA POTUS:
David Petraeus (email@example.com); Stan McChrystal (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Mr. Rubio and Mr. Tillerson:
M Rubio, R Tillerson: EoP RH Factual Reality and War Criminal Questions
The following EoP questions to yourselves relate to the following statements made as reported by CSPAN: Secretary of State Confirmation Hearing, Part 1 Former ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on his nomination to be secretary of state in the Donald Trump administration.
Marco Rubio: Let me ask you. Is Vladimir Putin a War Criminal?
Let me describe the situation in Aleppo. He has directed his military to conduct a devastating campaign. He’s targeted schools, markets. Not just assisted the Syrians. His military targeted schools, markets, other infrastructure resulting in the deaths of thousands of civilians. This is not the first time Mr. Putin was involved in campaigns of this kind. Back when he was appointed Prime Minister before he was elected. There was a series of bombings. They blamed it on the Chechens. Mr Putin ordered the Air Force to bomb their capital with scud missiles to hit hospitals, the main market, 137 people died instantly. They used thermal bar rack and field explosive bombs which ignite and burn the air breathed in by people hiding. He used battlefield weapons against civilians. An estimated 3000,000 civilians were killed and the city was destroyed. There was a credible body of reporting, open source and other, that all the bombings were part of a black flag operation on the part of the FSB and if you want to know the motivation, here it is. Putin’s approval ratings before the attacks were 31%. By mid august of that year it was 78% in just three months. Based on this information and whats publically in the record about what happened in Aleppo and the Russian military, you are not prepared to say Vladimir Putin and his military violated the rules of war and conducted war crimes in Aleppo.
Rex Tillerson: Those are very serious charges to make. I would want to have much more information before reaching a conclusion. I understand there is a body of record in the public domain. There is a body of record in the classified domain. In order to deal with a serious question like this.
Marco Rubio: There is much information about what happened in Aleppo. What happened is clearly documented. There is so much information. It should not be hard to say that Vladimir Putin’s military conducted war crimes in Aleppo. It is never acceptable, you would agree, for a military to specifically target civilians which happened there through the Russian military and, you know, I find it discouraging, your inability to cite that which I think is globally accepted.
Marco Rubio: The first is a partial list of dissidents, journalists and critics of Putin who died under highly suspicious circumstances. The second thing is a letter addressed to this committee by Vladimir Morza who was murdered. I would like to enter that into the record.
Mr. Tillerson, do you believe that Vladimir Putin and his cronies are responsible for ordering the murder of countless dissidents, journalists and political opponents?
Rex Tillerson: I don’t have sufficient information to make that claim.
Marco Rubio: Are you aware people who oppose Vladimir Putin wind up dead all over the world – poisoned, shot in the back of the head? Do you think that’s coincidental or possible or likely they were part of an effort to murder his political opponents?
Rex Tillerson: People who speak for freedom in regimes that are oppressive are often a threat. In terms of assigning specific responsibilities, I would have to have more information. As I indicated I feel it is important in advising the President if confirmed that I deal with facts. I deal with sufficient information which means having access to all information. I’m sure there is a large body of information I have never seen that’s all in the classified realm. I look forward, if confirmed to becoming fully informed. I am not willing to make conclusions on what’s only publicly available or
Marco Rubio: None of this is classified. These people are deald. Political opponenting …
Rex Tillerson: Your question was people who were directly responsible for that. I’m not disputing the people are dead.
Re: “Let me ask you. Is Vladimir Putin a War Criminal? … It should not be hard to say that Vladimir Putin’s military conducted war crimes in Aleppo. It is never acceptable, you would agree, for a military to specifically target civilians which happened there through the Russian military and, you know, I find it discouraging, your inability to cite that which I think is globally accepted.
Vladimir Putin Masonic War is Peace international law war criminal:
According to my laypersons understanding of fuck honour and fuck ecological carrying capacity Masonic War is Peace international law; there are exceptions where it is legally acceptable for a Masonic War is Peace military to directly and specifically target civilians.
Nuremberg Case Law: Rendulic Rule:
The Military Necessity Rendulic Rule was decided in the High Command Trial: Trial of Wilhelm von Leeb and Thirteen Others: United States Military Tribunal, Nuremberg; 30th December, 1947 – 28th October 1948.
In October 1944, Generaloberst Lothar Rendulic was Armed Forces Commander North, which included command of Nazi Forces in Norway. Following World War II, he was prosecuted for, among other charges, issuing an order “for the complete destruction of all shelter and means of existence in, and the total evacuation of the entire civilian population of the northern Norwegian province of Finmark…” Entire villages were destroyed, bridges and highways bombed, and port installations wrecked. Tried by an American military commission, Rendulic’s defence was military necessity. He presented evidence that the Norwegian population would not voluntarily evacuate and that rapidly approaching Russian forces would use existing housing as shelter and exploit the local population’s knowledge of the area to the detriment of retreating German forces. The Tribunal acquitted Rendulic of the charge, finding reasonable his belief that military necessity mandated his orders. His case offers one of the few adjudicated views of what constitutes military necessity.
“….. We are not called upon to determine whether urgent military necessity for the devastation and destruction in the province of Finmark actually existed. We are concerned with the question whether the defendant at the time of its occurrence acted within the limits of honest judgement on the basis of the conditions prevailing at the time. The course of a military operation by the enemy is loaded with uncertainties… It is our considered opinion that the conditions, as they appeared to the defendant at the time, were sufficient upon which he could honestly conclude that urgent military necessity warranted the decision made. This being true, the defendant may have erred in the exercise of his judgement but he was guilty of no criminal act. We find the defendant not guilty of the charge.”
International Criminal Court
Military necessity is governed by several constraints: an attack or action must be intended to help in the military defeat of the enemy; it must be an attack on a military objective, and the harm caused to civilians or civilian property must be proportional and not excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated.
Luis Moreno-Ocampo, Chief Prosecutor at the International Criminal Court, investigated allegations of war crimes during the 2003 invasion of Iraq and he published an open letter containing his findings. In a section titled “Allegations concerning War Crimes ” he did not call it military necessity but summed up the term:
Under international humanitarian law and the Rome Statute, the death of civilians during an armed conflict, no matter how grave and regrettable, does not in itself constitute a war crime. International humanitarian law and the Rome Statute permit belligerents to carry out proportionate attacks against military objectives, even when it is known that some civilian deaths or injuries will occur. A crime occurs if there is an intentional attack directed against civilians (principle of distinction) (Article 8(2)(b)(i)) or an attack is launched on a military objective in the knowledge that the incidental civilian injuries would be clearly excessive in relation to the anticipated military advantage (principle of proportionality) (Article 8(2)(b)(iv).
Article 8(2)(b)(iv) criminalizes:
Intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause incidental loss of life or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment which would be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated;
Article 8(2)(b)(iv) draws on the principles in Article 51(5)(b) of the 1977 Additional Protocol I to the 1949 Geneva Conventions, but restricts the criminal prohibition to cases that are “clearly” excessive. The application of Article 8(2)(b)(iv) requires, inter alia, an assessment of:
(a) the anticipated civilian damage or injury;
(b) the anticipated military advantage;
(c) and whether (a) was “clearly excessive” in relation to (b).
— Luis Moreno-Ocampo.
— EoP Axis Military Necessity Evacuation: Military and Political Necessity
An EoP summary of fuck honour and fuck ecological carrying capacity Masonic War is Peace international law can be found in EoP v Nobel: Draft Argument [PDF]; excluding footnotes, which included links to SQSwans [archive.is/DPDrV] and Tygae [archive.is/PS3Fx] Ecology of Peace websites on Weebly, which were hacked and deleted by the hacker; on 24 Oct 2016. EoP correspondence to San Francisco District Attorney, Police, Weebly et al; regarding Hacking of Weebly sites is available at: EoP Legal Submissions: LJ v Weebly Hackers:
Credible honourable Anthropocentric Jurisprudence practitioners should find that the constitutional and legislative Social Contract entered into between any civilized patriarchy Government, and its citizens, particularly its military and national security employees, is a civilized patriarchy legal matrix contract, based upon deception and fraud, which does not meet the requirements of a fully informed consenting agreement.
Civilized Patriarchy War-is-Peace jurisprudence is any Constitution or legislation that grants citizens the inalienable right to breed and consume without regard for ecological carrying capacity limits.
Honest Civilized Patriarchy Social Contract jurisprudence would clearly and explicitly inform its citizens that any Constitution or legislation that grants citizens the inalienable right to breed and consume without regard for ecological carrying capacity limits; is ‘War is Peace’ jurisprudence, which socio-economically and psycho-politically benefits the socio-political, corporate and media elite.
An honest Civilized Patriarchy War-is-Peace Enlistment Agreement would inform any citizen that they are Enlisting to become cannon fodder soldiers to be dispatched to plunder other nation’s resources, and lie to their fellow citizens, because their own country’s ecologically illiterate social contract jurisprudence does not require their fellow citizens to procreate and consume below their nation’s carrying capacity levels.
An honest Civilized Patriarchy War-is-Peace Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement would explicitly inform a Military or Intelligence Employee that they are expected to keep the thieving, plundering and mass murder culling consequences ‘saving face’ secrets of the American civilized patriarchy socio-political elite, endorsed by the legal matrix jurists, and an Ecologically Illiterate constitution; to themselves.
Civilized Patriarchy’s War-is-Peace Jurisprudence is a legal world, very similar to the Matrix religious world that existed before Martin Luther confronted the religious indulgence salesmen with his Ninety-Five Theses, on the Church of All Saints, on 31 October 1517, thereby initiating the Protestant Reformation.
In the Catholic Church’s religious Matrix world, only Catholic Bishops were entitled to be interpreters of the ‘word of god’. Only they could decide what God meant, about who was guilty and who was innocent, who would go to hell and who would go to heaven. God did not speak to common people, except via the Catholic Church’s bishops.
In Civilized Patriarchy’s Legal Matrix world, only those who swear blind obedience to Civilized Patriarchy’s Legal Matrix world – lawyers, prosecutors and judges – are deemed to possess the supposed superior intellectual Legal Godlike capabilities, to decipher, decode and interpret the ‘word of civilized patriarch gods’, hence capable of deciding which of us mere commons surplus vote, cannon and criminal fodder mortals acts of commission, or omission, is ‘lawful’ or ‘unlawful’.
In the Catholic Church’s religious Matrix world, the corporate and political elite could purchase – Forgiveness for Sale – Indulgences from the Catholic Church’s religious matrix Bishops; which influenced the Bishops interpretation of the ‘word of god’ in favour of the purchaser’s ‘forgiveness’ from the wrath of God, for their sins.
In Civilized Patriarchy’s Legal Matrix world, the corporate and political elite purchase – Innocence for Sale – Indulgences from the Legal Matrix Bishops to interpret the ‘word of civilized patriarch gods’; in favour of avoiding any legal interpretations that result in legislation or jurisprudence that defines the civilized patriarchy elite’s ecologically criminal acts of control of consumption and reproduction billion dollar thievery and mass murder, as ‘unlawful’.
Civilized Patriarchy Legal Matrix Flat Earth Jurisprudence ignores that Humans live on a planet with finite resources. Ecological laws dictate that any conscious species living in an ecosystem with finite resources, that wishes to avoid ecological overshoot, and the scarcity conflict consequences of overshoot, should enact legislation that limit their citizens procreation or consumption from transgressing cultural carrying capacity limits.
A nations non-renewable and renewable resources are a ‘commons’ and increased population and/or consumption of resources can only occur up to the point of ‘carrying capacity’ tipping points. Once ‘carrying capacity’ laws of nature tipping points are breached, once ecological overshoot occurs; and in NNR terms; Peak of Production, referred to as Peak Oil, or Peak NNR, Peak Water, Peak Land, Peak Population, etc; resource scarcity occurs which – in the absence of equivalent voluntary population and consumption reduction – triggers resource war violence, which exponentially increases the problems of those tasked with ‘national security’. There is a fundamental ecological, environmental security and consequent national security, difference between the resource war violence, from temporary resource scarcity that results on the upward side of the resource bell curve (when surplus resources can be imported for elsewhere), and the resource war violence on the downslope of the curve (when no surplus exists elsewhere in the absence of taking it by force).
Extensive Environment/Overshoot-Scarcity-Conflict documentation from military and intelligence agencies, united nations and governments, NGO’s and academic reports, etc, collectively document how legislative failure to restrict humanity’s procreation and consumption to cultural carrying capacity limits, and Legal Matrix Indulgences to Corporations: Socialized Corporate Externality Costs: Trillion Dollar Thefts from Global Natural Capital Commons, has resulted in humanity’s ecological overshoot of carrying capacity limits by between 700 to 400,000 percent; which include crossing urgent Planetary Boundary Tipping Points: (i) Loss of Biodiversity and Species Extinctions; (ii) Climate Change; (iii) Nitrogen Cycle; (iv) Ocean Acidification; (v) Changes in Land Use; (vi) Global Freshwater Use; (vii) State Shift in the Earth’s Biosphere; (viii) Peak Non-Renewable Natural Resources: Scarcity; with devastating current climate-resource-scarcity-conflict and refugees, and impending threat multiplier aggravation of crisis of ‘scarcity-conflict’ death spiral consequences.
The public in general are ecologically illiterate of current Overshoot-Scarcity-Conflict consequences of their procreation and consumption lifestyle’s, such as climate-resource-scarcity-conflict and refugees, and impending threat multiplier aggravation of crisis of ‘scarcity-conflict’ death spiral consequences; and hence unable or unwilling to make informed environmental decisions, as a result of the Media’s Censorship of Overshoot-Scarcity-Conflict contextual information in their reporting on socio-political scarcity and conflict problems resulting from ecological overshoot. For example in Dr. Michael Maher’s study: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population – Environment Connection, he took a random sample of 150 stories about urban sprawl, endangered species and water shortages and found that only 1 in ten framed population growth as a source of the problem. Media Matters studies in the US show that (i) in recent 2013 wildfire coverage, only 6 percent of total wildfire items mentioned climate change; (ii) in Midwest flood coverage, only 3 percent of stories mentioned climate change; (iii) in 2012, the nightly news covered the royal family more than climate change; (iv) a recent study documenting the warmest year on record received cool media coverage, almost entirely censoring scientists from climate change discussion; (v) in 2012, the Kardashians got 40 times more news coverage than ocean acidification, which affects over 50% of US fishery revenues; (vi) in 2012, TV media covered Joe Biden’s smile nearly twice as much as climate change, and Paul Ryan’s workout, three times more than record Arctic Sea Ice loss.
Citizens, citizens rights organisations and legislators serious and sincere about reducing the devastating current environmental and national security climate-resource-scarcity-conflict and refugees consequences from civilized patriarchy’s legislative failure to restrict humanity’s procreation and consumption to cultural carrying capacity limits, and Legal Matrix Indulgences to Corporations: Socialized Corporate Externality Costs: Trillion Dollar Thefts from Global Natural Capital Commons, should educate citizens about the importance of enacting Ecology of Peace legislation to determine: (A) Procreation footprint: how many children per family maintains procreation levels below carrying capacity and leads to sustainable peace? (B) Production Footprint: How much exploitation and production of non-renewable and renewable natural resources maintains production below carrying capacity and leads to sustainable peace? (C) Consumption Footprint: How much individual consumption maintains consumption levels below carrying capacity and leads to sustainable peace?
Anthropocentric jurisprudence prosecutorial and judicial officials should act to free Military and National Security leaders from their duty to protect Ecologically Illiterate Flat Earth unsustainable constitutions that legally, politically and procedurally denies them the opportunity of addressing the root causes of scarcity-conflict threats to national security; by holding legislators and citizens who legislatively or practically endorse unsustainable right to breed and consume legislation, including national and international law treaties, accountable as ‘breeding war’ or ‘consumption war’ scarcity combatants”; and rewarding citizens and legislators who endorse sustainable Ecology of Peace procreation and consumption lifestyle’s or legislation.
AnthroCorpocentric Jurisprudence officials should seriously consider the reality of devastating current SS-DEFCON-2 Scarcity-conflict and refugees, and impending threat multiplier SS-DEFCON-1 Scarcity-Conflict Death Spiral consequences of ecological overshoot of carrying capacity limits by between 700 to 400,000 percent; and the crossing of urgent Planetary Boundary Tipping Points: (i) Loss of Biodiversity and Species Extinctions; (ii) Climate Change; (iii) Nitrogen Cycle; (iv) Ocean Acidification; (v) Changes in Land Use; (vi) Global Freshwater Use; (vii) State Shift in the Earth’s Biosphere; (viii) Peak Non-Renewable Natural Resources: Scarcity; resulting from civilized patriarchy’s legislative failure to restrict humanity’s procreation and consumption to cultural carrying capacity limits, and Legal Matrix Indulgences to Corporations: Socialized Corporate Externality Costs: Trillion Dollar Thefts from Global Natural Capital Commons.
AnthroCorpocentric Jurisprudence officials should conclude that it is imperative for the court to allow these private prosecutions proceedings to proceed to (i) endorse Applicants Ecology of Peace definition of ‘crimes of aggression acts of war’ as the official Rome Statute Article 5(1)(d) definition; (b) provide the respondents with the opportunity to respond to the ‘crimes of aggression acts of war’ charges against them; by notifying the court of their unconditional Ecology of Peace co-operation apology for their former participation in ‘crimes of aggression acts of war’; or (b) file an objection brief, stating in writing their arguments and evidence; to the allegations; and (c) in the absence of (a) and (b) confirming the respondent/s as having been found guilty of ‘crimes of aggression acts of war’; and (c) authorizing Military and Intelligence agency officials to deliver the humane and orderly ‘genepool cleansing’ termination by assassination sentencing of all convicted accused – whose scarcity combatant bodies shall not be buried, but dumped into former coal, granary or other related silo’s to be organically converted into compost.
Civilized Patriarchy’s Legal Matrix Reality doctrine — the Inalienable ‘Right to Breed and Consume, but you need a License to Own a Gun, a License to Drive a Car, a License to Practice Law, a television license, a credit license, a license to earn a living, a university exemption license, a license to fish, a license to hunt, a liquor license, a business license, a marriage license, in some U.S. states, five year olds, even need to get a license to run a lemonade stand on their front lawn — hypocritically referred to as the ‘rule-of-law’ is a legal world of lawyers, politicians and priests, who prefer to negligently ignore, plausibly deny, or socio-psycho-phallicly benefit from the conquer-and-multiply and divide and conquer control over the means of human reproduction and consumption. It is a Matrix reality, of legal, political and religious indulgence salesmen.
It is a legal world, very similar to the Matrix religious world that existed before Martin Luther confronted the religious indulgence salesmen with his Ninety-Five Theses, on the Church of All Saints, on 31 October 1517, thereby initiating the Protestant Reformation.
In the Catholic Church’s religious Matrix world, only Catholic Bishops were entitled to be interpreters of the ‘word of god’. Only they could decide what God meant, about who was guilty and who was innocent, who would go to hell and who would go to heaven. God did not speak to common people, except via the Catholic Church’s bishops.
In Civilized Patriarchy’s Legal Matrix world, only those who swear blind obedience to Civilized Patriarchy’s Legal Matrix world – lawyers, prosecutors and judges – are deemed to possess the supposed superior intellectual Legal Godlike capabilities, to decipher, decode and interpret the ‘word of civilized patriarch gods’, hence capable of deciding which of us mere Commons surplus cannon fodder mortals acts of commission, or omission, is ‘lawful’ or ‘unlawful’.
Civilized Patriarchy’s Legal Matrix ‘AnthroCorpocentric law’ is based upon Flat Earth ‘jurisprudence’, as per the demands of those capable of purchasing Flat Earth legislation indulgences which make their ecologically – breeding/consumption war — criminal acts, to be deemed as ‘legal/lawful’ conduct by the Legal Matrix Bishops: lawyers, prosecutors and Judges.
It is a Matrix world of legal indulgence salesmen; who — ‘Contempt in Facie Curiae’ — demand the public’s sycophantic submissive obedience; for their supposed superior intellectual Godlike capabilities, to decipher, decode and interpret which of us mere Commons surplus cannon and vote fodder mortals acts of commission, or omission, is ‘lawful’ or ‘unlawful’.
Thieving, Conquering, Murdering and Culling Acts of Un/Lawfulness:
“Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.” – Henry Kissinger; The Final Days, by Bob Woodward & Carl Bernstein
Surplus vote fodder citizens may convert to becoming cannon-fodder citizens by joining the military to commit conquering or culling acts of murder and theft, as long as their murder and theft is sanctioned as a lawful conquer, culling or theft order, by one or more groups of left/right conquer-and-multiply legal indulgence salesmen.
In this Matrix Reality legal world, soldiers tasked with the national security conquering and culling responsibilities, of conquering to thieve another tribe’s resources, and culling population ‘useless eaters’ and ‘oxygen thieves’ surplus population excesses; on behalf of the conquering and culling profiteering demands of civilized patriarchy’s civilian corporate and political elite; constantly find themselves confronted with the conquer-or-culling “Befehl ist Befehl” Catch 22 dilemma:
To obey, or not to obey, a ‘Lebensraum’, ‘Difaqane’, ‘Operation Freedumb’ and the thousands like them, order to conquer or cull; since a lawful conquer or culling order, by one group of left/right conquer-and-multiply legal indulgence salesmen, can easily be reinterpreted to be an unlawful order, by another group of opposing left/right conquer-and multiply legal indulgence salesmen; presenting a Catch 22 dilemma from which there is no legal escape.
One who refuses a ‘lawful’ conquering or culling order will still probably be jailed for refusing orders, and one who accepts an ‘unlawful order will be jailed for committing unlawful culling or conquering acts.
Who decides, what is, and what is not, a conquering or culling lawful, or unlawful order?
The ‘Inalienable Right to Breed’ Matrix Reality conquer-and-multiply indulgence salesmen, with their specious justifications, and nightmare of Legal Matrix reality generated bureaucratic stare-decisis cryptic rules and statutes, of course!
“I don’t know what you mean by ‘glory,'” Alice said.
Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. “Of course you don’t—till I tell you. I meant ‘there’s a nice knock-down argument for you!'”
“But ‘glory’ doesn’t mean ‘a nice knock-down argument’,” Alice objected.
“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”
“The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”
“The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master—that’s all.”
— Through the Looking Glass, by Lewis Carroll
Anthropocentric Master’s of ‘Relevance’ Jurisprudence:
The question in a civilized patriarchy court is only concerned with who is the master of one word: ‘relevance’.
Any question or answer that exposes civilized patriarchy’s Legal Matrix system for what it is; a system far more corrupt than the Catholic Church’s Indulgences for Sale religious matrix, is simply deemed as ‘irrelevant’.
It is ‘irrelevant’ that legislators, lawyers, courts and judges defy the laws of ecology with a massive ‘fuck you’, by legislating, interpreting and enforcing Legal Matrix doctrine, that encourages citizens to breed and consume above cultural carrying capacity limits.
It is ‘irrelevant’ that legislators, lawyers, courts and judges know that legislation which ignores carrying capacity limits results in ecological overshoot, surplus vote-cannon-fodder populations, economic hierarchical inequality, and scarcity induced local, national and international conflict.
It is ‘irrelevant’ that legislators, lawyers, courts and judges know that legislation which enables ecological overshoot in multi-cultural/ethnic/religious communities, manifests as inter-cultural / ethnic / religious conflict.
It is ‘irrelevant’ that legislators, lawyers, courts and judges know that inter-cultural / ethnic conflict is a great divide and conquer tool to manipulate the proletariat to perceive other cultural/ethnic proletariat as the source of their own overshoot-scarcity-conflict misery.
It is ‘irrelevant’ that legislators, lawyers, courts and judges sit in judgement about an accused’s case of theft or murder; while consciously ignoring the theft and thievery and participation in mass murder of the civilized patriarchy corporate elite, who purchased ‘Innocence for Sale’ Indulgences from legislators to avoid legislation that defines their ecologically criminal acts of billion and trillion dollar thievery and murder as ‘unlawful’.
What is relevant?:
It is relevant that civilized patriarchy’s penis constitutions human factory farming rights to breed and consume, is to be master —that’s all.
Who says so?:
Civilized Patriarchy’s ecologically illiterate Legal Matrix Legislator’s, lawyers, judges and prosecutors ego-genitals say so!
Anthropocentric Jurisprudence – Ego-Penis/Vagina – Matrix Monologues:
When a member of civilized patriarchy is in conversation with his/her ego-penis/vagina: who is the boss in such relationship?
Is their legal rational, impartial, evidentiary mind, based upon ecological carrying capacity science, in charge?
Or are their ego-genitals demands to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits; to profit from vote fodder and cannon fodder surplus populations to use as their political and military battering ram to conquer other tribes to steal their resources; in charge?
If you and other Republicans and/or Democrat Senators and/or Congressmen, sincerely believe that Vladimir Putin, and/or any of his Generals and/or Admirals are guilty of Masonic War is Peace ‘war crimes’; have you submitted such allegations and complaints to the United States Government’s Attorney General and/or Pentagon Judge Advocate Generals for filing of official ‘war criminal’ charges against Vladimir Putin and/or his Generals or Admirals, at the International Criminal Court?
If not, when do you and your colleagues who consider this an alleged ‘globally accepted’ – i.e. easily proven in a court of law based upon evidence, for the purpose of a factual evidentiary finding of guilt – reality; intend to do so?
If you do not intend to do so: Is it because you don’t sincerely believe Vladimir Putin is a war criminal; you are only engaged in bullshit the public relations lying and deceiving for the benefit of your Masonic War is Peace political parasite approval ratings?.
If not: What exactly are your reasons for sincerely believing Vladimir Putin is factual and legally a war criminal; but having done sweet fuck all to provide your evidence and support to your Nation’s Attorney General to file such charges in the International Criminal Court?
Very much alive vs very dead – Russian or Not – Putin Dissidents.
For the Record: While I am not a Russian citizen, I have been criticial of President Vladimir Putin and his governments policies, when I sincerely disagreed with his policies based upon constructive criticism as to an error of logic or fact. As Mr Putin knows, because the FSB like the NSA were granted permission to psychotronically monitor my thoughts, to confirm for them my motives; I have fuck all interest in approval ratings from Masonic War is Peace presidents, popes, generals, or their left or right, white or black, secular or religious Masonic War is Peace wing sperm donors and brood sows two-legged tax farm cattle, pretending to be ‘citizens’. I am happy to provide my buck stops here, the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth opinion and/or analysis or constructive criticism, sometimes in buck stops here extremely brutal language, on any issue, to support individuals, whether they are janitors or presidents to engage in root cause problem solving; which according to EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality principles, mean cooperating in terms of allocation of resources and advocacy towards the implementation of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract.
I am very much alive, even though I have requested President Putin and the Russian Government’s help with my assisted suicide plans; resulting from the American Goverments refusal to answer a simple question: Does Timothy McVeigh’s faked execution pardon allow for him to spend time with me, somewhere in the Siberian wilderness, before we depart this Masonic infested planet predominantly ruled by fuck honour fuck ecological carrying capacity European and Jewish men; planet together.
Ecology of Peace international law war criminal or not: Vladimir Putin, Barack Obama, Erik Prince, Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, Rex Tillerson?:
In the Ecology of Peace culture, the legal term for a ‘war criminal’ is a ‘scarcity combatant’; as detailed in EoP correspondence to the International Criminal Court Judges: 29 Dec: ICC: Judge Silvia Fernandez de Gurmendi: Re: EoP ICC Private Pros: EoP PoW’s -v- Nobel Committee and Peace Laureates et al.
Succinct Summary of Private Prosecution Complaint:
On behalf of the EoP Applicants I have been preparing documentation for an ICC private prosecution in terms of Rendulic Rule Military Necessity doctrine; CA, UK, US & RSA Common Law Private Prosecution doctrine; Rome Statute: Art.5, 6, 7, 8 & 15; ICC Code of Judicial Ethics: Art 4, 5(1), 7 & 11. Charges: Crimes of Aggression Acts of War.
The Ecology of Peace culture’s definition of ‘crimes of aggression acts of war’ is as follows: “Any individual who is found guilty of advocating on behalf of, legislating, enforcing, or obeying any – cultural, religious, common, statutory, constitutional, or international – ‘scarcity combatant’ social contract; which enables or advocates on behalf of human procreation, consumption or production of resources that transgress ecological carrying capacity limits, is guilty of the ‘crime of aggression act of war’.”
Carrying Capacity Sustainability: I=PAT Equation:
For activities to be genuinely sustainable it must be possible for them to continue indefinitely. The impact of humanity on the environment and the demands that people place on the resources available on the planet can be summarized by what is known as the Ehrlich or IPAT equation, I=PAT. I = impact on the environment or demand for resources, P = population size, A = affluence and T = technology. The two most important conclusions deriving from this IPAT footprint relationship are that: (i) the Earth can support only a limited number of people, at a certain level of affluence, in a sustainable manner; and (ii) Population and Consumption must be reduced to below carrying capacity.
An individuals IPAT footprint is a result of: (A) Consumption Footprint multiplied by (B) Procreation Factor.
Consumption Footprint: Consumption footprint calculators are based upon Global Footprint Application Standards, and calculate an individuals consumption footprint based upon various questions about their consumption lifestyle’s; and provide a final consumption footprint in global hectares which is the individual’s ‘consumption footprint’; i.e. the amount of global productive land required for the production of products the individual consumes. Consumption Footprint calculators can be found at among others: Global Footprint Network; Earth Day; Center for Sustainable Economy; EcoCampus.
Global Footprint concepts were developed by among others: Dr. Mathis Wackernagel; Dr. William Rees; Dr. Herman Daly and the Global Footprint Network Standards Committee is one of two committees overseeing scientific review procedures and standards for Footprint calculations.
Procreation Factor: According to the research of Paul Murtaugh: A parent increases their consumption footprint by a factor of 20 for every child procreated.
Carrying Capacity aka Biocapacity Limits: “The maximum number of individuals that can be supported sustainably by a given environment is known as its ‘carrying capacity’. Worldwide the total amount of biologically productive land and sea amounts to 12 billion global hectares (gha); or 1.8 gha each if divided by 6.7 billion each. Guerrylla Laws are drawn up in accordance with the proactive conservation policies of Bhutan, who set aside 40% of their biologically productive to be returned to its natural state, for other species and wildlife conservation purposes; then that means that the total amount of biologically productive carrying capacity land available to humans is 60% of 12 billion; which amounts to 7.2 billion gha total; or 60% of 1.8 gha, which is 1 gha each.
Population factor is relevant, because the more humans there are, the less biologically productive land there is for everyone else.
Biocapacity limits of 6.7, 3.5, 1 Billion, 500, 250 & 100 Million humans: 7.2 billion global hectares of biologically productive land and water divided by (a) 6.7 billion humans, equals: 1.07 gha each; (b) 3.5 billion equals 2.05 gha each; (c) 1 billion equals 7.2 gha each; (d) 500 million equals 14.4 gha each; (e) 250 million equals 28.8 gha; (f) 100 million equals 72 gha each.
According to that legal definition, Vladimir Putin, Barack Obama, Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, Erik Prince, Rex Tillerson’s procreation and consumption eco-footprint would qualify them for ‘scarcity combatant’ war criminal convictions.
Necessity Nullification of War Criminal Conviction or Mitigation of Sentencing:
To the extent that the accused – Vladimir Putin, Barack Obama, Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, Erik Prince, or Rex Tillerson – proved that he used his ‘scarcity combatant’ aquired resources to cooperate to change the course of his nation or the Planet’s Ship of State, towards a focus of removing the military, legal, religious, academic, etc obstacles obstructing the implementation of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract for his nation and the planet; his scarcity combatant war criminal conviction would be nullified by the principle of objective and/or subjective political or military necessity.
To the extent that the Prosecutor proved that the accused – Vladimir Putin, Barack Obama, Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, Erik Prince, or Rex Tillerson – used his ‘scarcity combatant’ war criminal resources to (i) negligently or consciously and/or deliberately obstruct the implementation of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; he would be convicted, and sentenced to (ii) re-education classes on any of the egological or ecological literacy issues he was illiterate about, resulting in his negligent actions; or (ii) elimination from the planetary genepool, according to his state assisted suicide preference.
To the extent that my observations and interpretations are proven accurate by evidence:
Vladimir Putin & Barack Obama would be found Innocent; Erik Prince, Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, Rex Tillerson would be convicted as negligent and/or consciously deliberate scarcity combatant war criminals.
According to my observations and interpretations of the military, legal, ecological, media, political, religious actions of EoP Applicant: Vladimir Putin over the past fifteen years, for the most part, he has used ‘scarcity combatant’ aquired resources available to him to cooperate to change the course of Russian Ship of State, towards a focus of removing the military, legal, religious, academic, etc obstacles obstructing the implementation of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract for Russia and the planet.
According to my observations and interpretations of the military, legal, ecological, media, political, religious actions of EoP v Nobel: Respondent: Barack Obama over the past eight years, for the most part, he could reasonably argue, that he has made an effort to use any ‘scarcity combatant’ acquired resources available to him to cooperate to change the course of America’s Ship of State, towards a focus of removing the military, legal, religious, academic, etc obstacles obstructing the implementation of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract for America and the planet.
According to my observations and interpretations of the military, legal, ecological, media, political, religious actions of alleged EoP Applicant: Erik Prince, over the past eight years, for the most part, he could not reasonably argue, that he has made any effort to use any ‘scarcity combatant’ aquired resources available to him to cooperate with EoP Applicants or President Obama, to change the course of America’s Ship of State, towards a focus of removing the military, legal, religious, academic, etc obstacles obstructing the implementation of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract for America and the planet.
I am not aware of any actions of Marco Rubio, Donald Trump or Rex Tillerson, using any ‘scarcity combatant’ aquired resources available to them to cooperate with President Obama and the American intelligence community; to change the course of America’s Ship of State, towards a focus of removing the military, legal, religious, academic, etc obstacles obstructing the implementation of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract for America and the planet.
Mr. Rex Tillerson:
Re: “As I indicated I feel it is important in advising the President if confirmed that I deal with facts.”
What is your legal definition for the term ‘important’ and ‘facts’?
Could you provide President Putin, President Elect Trump, US and Russian Attorney and Prosecutor Generals, Marco Rubio and the EoP MILED Clerk, with a buck stops here public written statement response, publicly posted to Donald Trump Transition Team website — greatagain.gov — with your written confirmation of the accuracy of, or clarification of any errors of fact or logic; of the following Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality principles; by 11:00 hrs on 20 January 2017:
Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality:
 Earth is not flat.
 Resources are finite.
 When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletion and resource conflict.
 Some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources include: poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc.
 The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits is the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the Masonic War is Peace international law social contract.
 If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, corporations and/or nations sincerely want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate to nullify the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses and replace them with Ecology of Peace clauses that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool.
Lara Johnstone, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn
PO Box 5042, George East, 6539, RSA
GMC 4643-13 & 2578-14 Pro Se Applicant
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk