25 Jan: Angry White Dude .. John Prados

* EoP v WiP NWO Neg: Angry White Dude .. John Prados
» Peter Beinart via JJ Goldberg; Quaker: David Chandler; Killology: Lt Col Dave Grossman; John Prados
* 25 Jan: EoP Response to: Angry White Dude: Angry White Dude’s Irrepressible Conflict
» 25 Jan: Responses from Angry White Dude, Quaker: David Chandler
» 28 Jan: EoP Response to: Angry White Dude & Quaker: David Chandler; Re: RedStateNYC’s Irrepressible Conflict
» 29 Jan: Response from Quaker.org: David Chandler
» 29 Jan: EoP Response to Quaker.org: David Chandler
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub / EoP NWO SCO / EoP v WiP Psych: EoP v Nobel, EoP PoW Sub, EoP Cop21, EoP NTE GMA POTUS, EoP Axis MilNec Evac, EoP v WiP NWO Neg.

.

From: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 1:39 PM
Subject: EoP Response to: Angry White Dude: Angry White Dude’s Irrepressible Conflict
To: Angry White Dude <angrywhitedude@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Beinart via JJ Goldberg <Goldberg@forward.com>, David Chandler <david@mathwithoutborders.com>, “Killology: Lt Col Dave Grossman” <info@killology.com>, John Prados <VZE2NTG5@verizon.net>

Angry White Dude (angrywhitedude@gmail.com)

CC: Peter Breinart, Dave Grossman, David Chandler, John Prados.
Peter Beinart via JJ Goldberg (Goldberg@forward.com); @peterbeinart; Quaker: David Chandler (david@mathwithoutborders.com); Killology: Lt Col Dave Grossman (info@killology.com); John Prados: Contact; (VZE2NTG5@verizon.net)

EoP Response to: Angry White Dude: Angry White Dude’s Irrepressible Conflict

EoP Response to: Angry White Dude: Our Irrepressible Conflict [archive.is/GZnKH]

Refd: Forward: Trump and Netanyahu Are Going To Get Jews Killed — Unless They Change Course, What Stirred Hornets Nest?. Quaker: On War, by U.S General Smedley Butler (1933). Lt. Col Dave Grossman; Psychological Effects of Combat. John Prados: What Future in Trump’s “Respect” for the CIA?

There are no foundational differences between the Masonic War is Peace left and right. Both ideologies are built on the war economy quicksand support for the right to breed and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits clauses of international law for them to parasitically profit – militarily, academically, politically, religiously, etc – from the Masonic War is Peace war economy. Both the left and right Masonic War is Peace elite parasitically profiteer of their human cattle sperm donor and brood sow tax farms. [Story of Your Enslavement, Human Farming: Our Enslavement, False Left Right Paradigm, 16-09-10_rmyerswareconrecipebook]

What is your definition for intelligence and intellectually honest?

Ecology of Peace definition for intellectually honest is ego and ecological literacy.

As for intelligence: Any enquiry into a clear and succinct definition of ‘intelligence’ would require individuals who are buck stops here intellectually honest, to arrive at an accurate definition of ‘intelligence’.

What most people refer to as ‘intelligence’ appears to be a result of them following their  Masonic War is Peace cultural scripting; not a result of their honest existential enquiry into what they as individuals want, from the experience of being alive, on this planet, at this time.

If an individual is incapable of intellectual honesty, to buck stops here honestly evaluate any of his hypothesis as to what could be an accurate definition of ‘intelligence’; then such individuals belief in his or her superior intelligence, or even in the concept of ‘superior intelligence’ in one or another skill or endeavour, are equivalent to children’s beliefs in fairy tales.

A child who believes a fairy tale that it is intelligent to walk off a cliff and a simple prayer to Jesus, will keep their body from crashing down the cliff, is in for a rude awakening.

Put differently: Ecology of Peace off the cuff working hypothesis definition of ‘intelligence’ would be:

What do you want from life? If you don’t know what you want: it would be intelligent for you to find someone who can help you decide for you what you want from life? If you do know what you want: Find others who are willing to be honest with you, to help you to be honest with yourself, to get what you want. Be honest with yourself and others about what you want. Some people may not be willing to help you get one thing you want, but may be willing to help you get something else you may want or need. Deceiving people to get what you want, means they will be less willing to help you to get what you want next time you ask. Put differently: If you are so ashamed of what you want, that you are not willing to ask for help to get what you want honestly and sincerely; what does that say about your intelligence about honest communication and relationships?  If you want others to cooperate with you to get what you want, be honest with them. If you have been honest with others about what you want, and you cannot find others who want what you want, or are willing to help you to get what you want. Confront that reality. The more fair-minded, sincere and honest people, you sincerely and honestly and fairly help to get what they want, the more they may be willing to help you get what you want. The more you deceive, lie and manipulate others to get what you want, the more you will need to rely on bribery and deception to get what you want, and the more enemies you will make with your fuck honour tactics, to get what you want. If you think what someone wants is unreasonable and/or unfair. Be honest with them about why you don’t want to help them, so they can evaluate whether what they want is reasonable and justified and fair. At the end of your life, you may not have gotten all you wanted, but you can know you were honest about what you wanted, help others when you could and lived a sincere and honourable inner peace life, which is not something 99.99% of the lonely, petrified, paranoid, backstabbing, self hating oligarchs could say for themselves, for the past ten thousand years.

What are you trying to say with ‘this is not a recipe for peace’?

Donald Trump’s cabinet is not a recipe for peace? If so: Agreed. Lots of people’s breeding, consumption and communication behaviours are not recipe’s for peace.

Donald Trump, his transition advisors and supporters did not accept the offer to appoint an Ecology of Peace Near Term Extinction Green Morning America cabinet.

Donald Trump: Int of Yr Supporter EoP or WiP Answers: Pro WiP America No Los Pepes Rules … RE: Former EoP Applicant: Erik Prince; now WiP American. …. RE: Donald Trump ‘pretend we give a fuck about racial and economic problem solving and friendship with Russia’ supporters.
— EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 25 Nov: Donald Trump … Federal Election Commission.

Maybe Donald Trump and his cabinet will change their minds, and decide to sincerely support EoP recipe for peace, maybe not. If Trump’s Alt Right or Cernovich supporters or Mercer/Prince oligarchs – pretend we give a fuck about peace, but refuse to be the boss of our physical and ego penises – supporters don’t provide Donald Trump with constructive criticism feedback and backup to help him change his mind; the blame does not lie entirely on him.

When the mass violence starts, and some Israeli Jews die, and many more huddle in bomb shelters, I won’t write a column like this. I won’t write a column like this because when Jewish blood flows, it changes the conversation. American Jews became less tolerant of criticism of Israel. And I feel less comfortable offering it. When the next intifada begins, I’ll write more cautiously for fear of causing pain to my fellow Jews, who will already be suffering enough.

So I’ll say it bluntly now: Unless they change course, Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu are going to get Jews killed. I’m not saying that’s what they want. Of course not. And I’m not trying to detract from the primary moral responsibility of those Palestinians who detonate bombs or shoot guns or stab with knives. Palestinian terrorism is inexcusable. It always has been. It always will be.

But when experts warn that actions are likely to spark violence, and you take them anyway, you are responsible too.

Last week, according to Haaretz, the Israeli army, police and internal security service all “presented Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and senior ministers with scenarios of worsening violence should incoming President Donald Trump announce the relocation of the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.” Mohammed al-Momani, media affairs minister for the government of Jordan, which provides invaluable anti-terror assistance to both Israel and the United States, warned that moving the embassy would have “catastrophic consequences.” Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat said moving the embassy, and annexing West Bank settlements, will spark “chaos, lawlessness and extremism.”

[..]

That’s why Israeli security officials have consistently noted that when Palestinians despair of gaining those basic rights, the likelihood of Palestinian violence goes up. In 2013, Yuval Diskin, former head of the Shin Bet, warned that “The fading hopes for a real change in the situation” is “the reason why, at the end of the day, the Palestinians will take to the streets, leading to another round of bloody violence.” In 2015, Herzl Halevi, the IDF’s chief of military intelligence, said one of the main drivers of Palestinian violence was the feeling among Palestinian youth that they have “nothing to lose.”

The greatest protest leaders, Martin Luther King and Mahatma Gandhi, found ways to give their people hope while still insisting that they reject violence no matter the provocation. And unlike Yasser Arafat, who flirted disastrously with violence during the second intifada, today’s Palestinian leaders must strive to emulate King and Gandhi’s example.

But if Palestinians have responsibilities, we Jews do, too. On the night King was murdered, as violence erupted in black neighborhoods across America, Robert Kennedy said that, “There is another kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions; indifference and inaction and slow decay…This is the breaking of a man’s spirit by denying him the chance to stand as a father and as a man among other men.”

— Forward: Trump and Netanyahu Are Going To Get Jews Killed — Unless They Change Course

If you are sincerely interested in a recipe for peace; you may wish to consider supporting Donald Trump to change his mind, and adopt any of the options for implementing an Ecology of Peace New World Order social contract.

The largest terrorist organization on the planet, for the past fifty years, that has been terrorizing the rest of the planet, has been the United States Military goosestepping to the orders of fuck honour, fuck ecological carrying capacity Masonic War is Peace American, EU and Jewish oligarchs and their brood sow and sperm donor cattle, pretending to be citizens, to steal other nations resources, for the financial profits of fuck honour, fuck ecological carrying capacity cattle who call themselves American, EU and Israel citizens and their fuck honour oligarchs.

“Multiculturalism: How, then, does the universe of Capital relate to the form of Nation State in our era of global capitalism? Perhaps, this relationship is best designated as ‘auto-colonization’: with the direct multinational functioning of Capital, we are no longer dealing with the standard opposition between metropolis and colonized countries; a global company as it were cuts its umbilical cord with its mother-nation and treats its country of origins as simply another territory to be colonized. This is what disturbs so much the patriotically oriented right-wing populists, from Le Pen to Buchanan: the fact that the new multinationals have towards the French or American local population exactly the same attitude as towards the population of Mexico, Brazil or Taiwan. Is there not a kind of poetic justice in this self-referential turn? Today’s global capitalism is thus again a kind of ‘negation of negation’, after national capitalism and its internationalist/colonialist phase. At the beginning (ideally, of course), there is capitalism within the confines of a Nation-State, with the accompanying international trade (exchange between sovereign Nation-States); what follows is the relationship of colonization in which the colonizing country subordinates and exploits (economically, politically, culturally) the colonized country; the final moment of this process is the paradox of colonization in which there are only colonies, no colonizing countries—the colonizing power is no longer a Nation-State but directly the global company. In the long term, we shall all not only wear Banana Republic shirts but also live in banana republics.” – Slavoy Zizek: Multiculturalism: The Cultural Logic of Multinational Capitalism.

**

War is just a racket. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of people. Only a small inside group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few at the expense of the masses.

I believe in adequate defense at the coastline and nothing else. If a nation comes over here to fight, then we’ll fight. The trouble with America is that when the dollar only earns 6 percent over here, then it gets restless and goes overseas to get 100 percent. Then the flag follows the dollar and the soldiers follow the flag.

I wouldn’t go to war again as I have done to protect some lousy investment of the bankers. There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket.

There isn’t a trick in the racketeering bag that the military gang is blind to. It has its “finger men” to point out enemies, its “muscle men” to destroy enemies, its “brain men” to plan war preparations, and a “Big Boss” Super-Nationalistic-Capitalism.

It may seem odd for me, a military man to adopt such a comparison. Truthfulness compels me to. I spent thirty- three years and four months in active military service as a member of this country’s most agile military force, the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from Second Lieutenant to Major-General. And during that period, I spent most of my time being a high class muscle- man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the Bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism.

I suspected I was just part of a racket at the time. Now I am sure of it. Like all the members of the military profession, I never had a thought of my own until I left the service. My mental faculties remained in suspended animation while I obeyed the orders of higher-ups. This is typical with everyone in the military service.

I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912 (where have I heard that name before?). I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China I helped to see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested.

During those years, I had, as the boys in the back room would say, a swell racket. Looking back on it, I feel that I could have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents.
— Quaker: On War, by U.S General Smedley Butler (1933)

If not: Good luck with your new fuck honour, fuck ecological carrying capacity — lets piss off 6 billion planetary citizens, to support nuking America off the face of the planet — Sheriff!

Pentagon cannot even win a war against the Taliban, and your new Sheriff dumbfuck locked and loaded penis goosetepping whitey voter’s wants the Pentagon to fight the entire world!

The Ecology of Peace culture’s legal definitions of whom is sincerely committed to peace and justice for all — not just fuck honour, fuck ecological carrying capacity white men and their Uncle Tom capitalist bourgeois house niggers – and who are the breeding and consumption scarcity combatants doing the warring was submitted to among others: International Criminal Court: EoP v Nobel [PDF].

As for Trump has the backs of fuck honour, fuck ecological carrying capacity white and black right wing Americans:

The only thing that is locked and loaded in you, is your fuck honour fuck ecological carrying capacity penis. If your tits and ass slut wife or girlfriend did not give you a mult-orgasm blowjob this morning; why did you marry such a tits and ass slut?. If you did not give your wife or girlfriend a multi-orgasm pussybreakfast this morning; why did she marry you? Cause you’re a dumbfuck walking wallet, only interested in a tits and ass slut trophy wife broodsow, to impress your fellow dumbfuck walking wallet walking penis white males, only interested in tits and assslut trophy wife broodsows to impress you?  Are you impressed with their fuck honour, fuck ecological carrying capacity tits and ass slut brood sow addicted to walking wallet penis parasite wives? Are you happy being a fuck honour, fuck ecological carrying capacity locked and loaded walking wallet penis sperm donor debt slave?

David Burge: I doubt Trump will end any of these wars, I just hope somebody will eventually tell us which side we’re on

EoP MILED Clerk: eop-v-wip.tygae.org.za may have some useful info to help you answer the question whether you are, and/or want to be, the boss or slave of your penis/vagina.
— EoP v WiP NWO Neg: David Burge … Republican Sinn Fein Poblachtach.

**

One obvious and tragic price of war is the toll of death and destruction. But there is an additional cost, a psychological cost borne by the survivors of combat, and a full understanding of this cost has been too long repressed by a legacy of self-deception and intentional misrepresentation. After peeling away this “legacy of lies” that has perpetuated and glorified warfare there is no escaping the conclusion that combat, and the killing that lies at the heart of combat, is an extraordinarily traumatic and psychologically costly endeavor that profoundly impacts all who participate in it.

[…] A Cultural Conspiracy

It is essential to acknowledge that good ends have been and will continue to be accomplished through combat. Many democracies owe their very existence to successful combat. ..  And around the world the price of civilization is paid every day by military units on peacekeeping operations and domestic police forces who are forced to engage in close combat. There have been and will continue to be times and places where combat is unavoidable, but when a society requires its police and armed forces to participate in combat it is essential to fully comprehend the magnitude of the inevitable psychological toll.

It is often said that “All’s fair in love and war,” and this expression provides a valuable insight into the human psyche, since these twin, taboo fields of sexuality and aggression represent the two realms in which most individuals will consistently deceive both themselves and others. Our psychological and societal inability to confront the truth about the effects of combat is the foundation for the cultural conspiracy of repression, a deception and denial that has helped to perpetuate and propagate war throughout recorded history.

In the field of developmental psychology a mature adult is sometimes defined as someone who has attained a degree of insight and self-control in the two areas of sexuality and aggression. This is also a useful definition of maturity in civilizations. Thus two important and reassuring trends in recent years have been the development of the science of human sexuality, which has been termed “sexology,” and a parallel development of the science of human aggression, which D. Grossman has termed “killology.” There is universal consensus that continued research in this previously taboo realm of human aggression is vital to the future development, and perhaps to the very existence, of our civilization.
– Lt. Col Dave Grossman; Psychological Effects of Combat | On KillingOn Killing II: Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill |DHS to purchase 62 million rounds of AR-15 ammo|
EoP v WiP NWO negotiations Legal Correspondence to International Psychiatry and Psychology Organisations: 1.C: Lt Col Dave Grossman: Cultural Conspiracy — Sexology & Killology — Denial and Repression.

Locked and loaded dumbfuck Americans’ incapable of engaging in a root cause problem solving discussion have been the cannon fodder troops for fuck honour, fuck ecological carrying capacity American oligarchs for 50 years! Not all the world’s oligarchs, are fuck honour, fuck ecological carrying capacity oligarchs!

Careful the remaining members of the EoP Axis: do not inform your ‘Abraham Lincoln’ that you – fuck honour, fuck ecological carrying capacity white men and women, who ain’t got the goddamn honour or balls to support your Abraham Lincoln to cooperate with EoP Axis parties, to implement Ecology of Peace and justice law and order for all – are the Albert Pike Boris Nemtsov enemy, obstructing the implementation of an Ecology of Peace social contract, and he should send in the General Sherman or Zhirinovsky Katrina troops to eliminate you from the planetary genepool, once and for all; so the rest of us can have a sincere discussion about implementing an Ecology of Peace international law social contract, for the benefit of all responsible freedom, from all races and religions.

Declaiming in front of the agency’s hallowed wall of stars–known and still-clandestine officers who have given their lives in United States service–Trump spoke only briefly  before he veered off on tangents–even more extravagant falsities about his crowds at the inauguration, and self-congratulatory puffery on his “intelligence.” But while he was actually still on point, the president hinted at several of his intentions for CIA. Returning to waterboarding and torture was one, stronger action against the islamists of ISIS was another–this time taking their oil. (Why seizing Syrian oil on behalf of an oil-rich U.S. would be necessary, and how that might be feasible without pipelines and in the face of Syrian national sovereignty, plus how those intentions would complicate the problem for CIA officers trying to recruit Syrian militants, are all questions that speak to the new president’s intelligence.)

Bottom line: President Trump intends actions that will require greater CIA efforts. He needs the CIA. But at the same time he distrusts the agency and its intelligence–witness Trump’s steadfast rejection of the Russian hack. The role of the hack, and of FBI Director James Comey’s eleventh-hour reinvestigation of Hillary Clinton, in Trump’s election requires getting rid of those who can tell the tale. That need, in addition to Mr. Trump’s ephemeral but constant course changes, will ensure the purge goes on. The deputy to the Director of National Intelligence, and the chief of staff to the CIA director have already sent in their resignations. No doubt a stream of other mid-ranking and senior officials will follow. A little bit down the line, the result will be that a corps of junior officers faces the president’s demands for extreme, even extra-legal action. Not only will there be more stars on the CIA wall, there will be more agency officers in the soup. And where will President Trump be then? My guess is not “backing” the CIA any more than he is backing Paul Manafort or Roger Stone in the Russian influence peddling scandal. Those gentlemen are now non-persons in the Trumpian universe.
— John Prados: What Future in Trump’s “Respect” for the CIA? [archive.is/swBoC]

A copy of this correspondence shall be documented at EoP Leg Sub / EoP NWO SCO / EoP v WiP Psych: EoP v Nobel, EoP PoW Sub, EoP Cop21, EoP NTE GMA POTUS, EoP Axis MilNec Evac, and EoP v WiP NWO Neg.

Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn
PO Box 5042, George East, 6539, RSA
GMC 4643-13 & 2578-14 Pro Se Applicant
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk

.

 

__________________________________________
From: David Chandler <davidschandler48@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: EoP Response to: Angry White Dude: Angry White Dude’s Irrepressible Conflict
To: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@gmail.com>
Cc: Angry White Dude <angrywhitedude@gmail.com>, Peter Beinart via JJ Goldberg <Goldberg@forward.com>, David Chandler <david@mathwithoutborders.com>, “Killology: Lt Col Dave Grossman” <info@killology.com>, John Prados <VZE2NTG5@verizon.net>

How did I get on this list?
–David Chandler

 

___________________________________________
From: AWD <angrywhitedude@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 8:36 PM
Subject: Re: EoP Response to: Angry White Dude: Angry White Dude’s Irrepressible Conflict
To: David Chandler <davidschandler48@gmail.com>
Cc: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@gmail.com>, Peter Beinart via JJ Goldberg <Goldberg@forward.com>, David Chandler <david@mathwithoutborders.com>, “Killology: Lt Col Dave Grossman” <info@killology.com>, John Prados <VZE2NTG5@verizon.net>

I have no idea how I got on the list either. I didn’t write the article.  It was written by RedStater.

awd

.

____________________________________________
From: David Chandler <davidschandler48@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 8:59 PM
Subject: Re: EoP Response to: Angry White Dude: Angry White Dude’s Irrepressible Conflict
To: AWD <angrywhitedude@gmail.com>
Cc: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@gmail.com>, Peter Beinart via JJ Goldberg <Goldberg@forward.com>, David Chandler <david@mathwithoutborders.com>, “Killology: Lt Col Dave Grossman” <info@killology.com>, John Prados <VZE2NTG5@verizon.net>

On Jan 25, 2017, at 12:14 PM, David Chandler <davidschandler48@gmail.com> wrote:
Our Irrepressible Conflict

Where is this coming from?  I didn’t write any of this crap.  When I write I write coherent thoughts in complete sentences.  I don’t just vomit on the page.

–David Chandler

.

__________________________________
From: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 4:01 PM
Subject: EoP Response to: Angry White Dude & Quaker: David Chandler; Re: RedStateNYC’s Irrepressible Conflict
To: Angry White Dude <angrywhitedude@gmail.com>, “Quaker: David Chandler” <david@mathwithoutborders.com>
Cc: Peter Beinart via JJ Goldberg <Goldberg@forward.com>, “Killology: Lt Col Dave Grossman” <info@killology.com>, John Prados <VZE2NTG5@verizon.net>

Angry White Dude (angrywhitedude@gmail.com); Quaker: David Chandler (david@mathwithoutborders.com)

CC: Peter Breinart, Dave Grossman, John Prados.
Peter Beinart via JJ Goldberg (Goldberg@forward.com); Killology: Lt Col Dave Grossman (info@killology.com); John Prados (VZE2NTG5@verizon.net)

Mr. Chandler & Angry White Dude:

EoP Response to: Angry White Dude & Quaker: David Chandler; Re: RedStateNYC’s Irrepressible Conflict

My apologies for delay in my response to your 25 Jan 2017 email responses. I only checked the email account today: 28 Jan 2017.

Re: Why did you receive the correspondence sent to you, which I imagine is what you were saying with ‘How did I get on this list’.

Angry White Dude:

You were included in the EoP comment response correspondence to the article posted to Angry White Dude’s website — Angry White Dude: Our Irrepressible Conflict.

David Chandler:

You were included in the EoP comment response correspondence to the article posted to Angry White Dude’s website — Angry White Dude: Our Irrepressible Conflict — because the EoP comment response included reference to an article on the Quaker website — Quaker: On War, by U.S General Smedley Butler (1933). — managed by you: David Chandler.

**

Angry White Dude & David Chandler:

Peter Breinart via JJ Goldberg, Lt Col Grossman and John Prados were also included because articles written by them, or posted to their websites were included in the correspondence to Angry White Dude; namely: Forward: Trump and Netanyahu Are Going To Get Jews Killed — Unless They Change Course, Lt. Col Dave Grossman; Psychological Effects of Combat. John Prados: What Future in Trump’s “Respect” for the CIA?

In the Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty culture, if you say something about someone that could be construed as negative, or which is an interpretation of their representation on a particular subject, you provide them with a copy of such correspondence, and your interpretation; so that they have the opportunity to either respond to your constructive criticism, or to clarify that your interpretation of their perspective is inaccurate. Its simply honourable transparent communication.

**

.Angry White Dude:

“I didn’t write the [Our Irrepressible Conflict] article.  It was written by RedStater.”

The article was posted to the Angry White Dude website, whether written by RedStater, yourself, Pinkstater, FuckHonourStater, or whomever. The EoP comment was submitted to the contact details on your Angry White Dude website, to which you responded. Forward it to RedstaterNYC if you want or don’t.

**

Mr. Chandler:

Re: “Where is this coming from?  I didn’t write any of this crap.  When I write I write coherent thoughts in complete sentences.  I don’t just vomit on the page.”

If your criticism is about anything EoP MILED Clerk authored, kindly clarify what word, sentence, or paragraph you are providing constructive criticism to; namely errors of fact, logic or interpretation of facts; and your constructive criticism shall be welcomed, and any statement of fact or interpretation amended, if so required by the quality of your constructive criticism evidence.

If you are sincere about providing constructive criticism to anyone else, irrespective of their culture, race or religion, the above suggestions may help you to clearly communicate what exactly you are trying to say to them; if anything.

I am a member of an Ecology of Peace culture. Ecology of Peace communication policy is available at: Eco and Egologically literate. The original correspondence you received from EoP MILED Clerk was part of Ecology of Peace v Masonic War is Peace Negotiations correspondence.

If you appreciate being informed of the EoP v WiP Negotiations information, enabling you and your family, to decide what kind of future you would wish to support; if your response is EoP motivated: a simple ‘Thank you, how can I help’; would suffice, to start a discussion as to what skills you may be able to contribute towards an honest transparent EoP v WiP Negotiations; to determine the level of interest for turning of the Masonic War is Peace breeding/consumption war tap, to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract.

If you were not formally aware of EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations, and would have preferred to remain ignorant, about EoP v WiP negotiations; my apologies. Your aforementioned responses could probably be interpreted as ‘Fuck Honour WiP motivated.’

If my interpretation of your ‘Fuck Honour WiP motivated’ responses is inaccurate, kindly clarify what the accurate interpretation of your intentions regarding honourable, transparent EoP v WiP Negotiations are, and if supported by evidence in your communication and behaviour, I shall be happy to amend my interpretations.

Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn
PO Box 5042, George East, 6539, RSA
GMC 4643-13 & 2578-14 Pro Se Applicant
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk


From: David Chandler <davidschandler48@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 2:50 AM
Subject: Re: EoP Response to: Angry White Dude & Quaker: David Chandler; Re: RedStateNYC’s Irrepressible Conflict
To: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@gmail.com>
Cc: Angry White Dude <angrywhitedude@gmail.com>, “Quaker: David Chandler” <david@mathwithoutborders.com>, Peter Beinart via JJ Goldberg <Goldberg@forward.com>, “Killology: Lt Col Dave Grossman” <info@killology.com>, John Prados <VZE2NTG5@verizon.net>

Given that I didn’t opt in to this forum, that I don’t know the background, premises, affiliation, or anything else about the people I’m talking to, and that I can hardly read the jargon-laden messages or know what you take the made-up words to mean, please opt me out of the conversation.  Bye.

–David Chandler, aka (apparently) Quaker

.

From: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 6:36 PM
Subject: EoP Response to Quaker.org: David Chandler; Re: RedStateNYC’s Irrepressible Conflict
To: David Chandler <david@mathwithoutborders.com>
Cc: Peter Beinart via JJ Goldberg <Goldberg@forward.com>, “Killology: Lt Col Dave Grossman” <info@killology.com>, John Prados <VZE2NTG5@verizon.net>, Angry White Dude <angrywhitedude@gmail.com>

David Chandler (david@mathwithoutborders.com)
Quaker.org Webmaster.

CC: Peter Breinart, Dave Grossman, John Prados.
Peter Beinart via JJ Goldberg (Goldberg@forward.com); Killology: Lt Col Dave Grossman (info@killology.com); John Prados (VZE2NTG5@verizon.net); Angry White Dude (angrywhitedude@gmail.com)

Mr. Chandler:

EoP Response to Quaker.org: David Chandler; Re: RedStateNYC’s Irrepressible Conflict

Re: Forum:

It is not a forum. It was simply an Ecology of Peace comment response to Angry White Dude, with honourable transparency copies to individuals and/or websites referenced in the EoP comment.

I shall remove you from any further emails, sent by myself, re: EoP Response to: Angry White Dude: Angry White Dude’s Irrepressible Conflict.

Re: Request for Removal from further correspondence:

If you ever change your mind and you are interested in cooperating with others sincere about root cause problem solving peace making, by addressing the root causes of resource conflict, namely the right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity clauses of Masonic War is Peace intenational law, let me know.

If never, prior to your departure from this planet, of natural causes, or as a consequence of your support for exponentially increasing population pressures colliding with finite resources conflict ‘pretend I give a fuck about peace, while doing sweet goddamn fuck all about the root causes of war’ War is Peace whoring; enjoy your – hopefully non-violent, if that is your preference, and other War is Peace whore parties agree to respect your preference – departure trip.

Re: Apparently a Quaker:

I don’t know if you are a Quaker or not. I am not an expert on what or who a Quaker is or not.

If you consider yourself a Quaker based upon some Quaker definition, then as long as you live according to that definition, you would be a Quaker. As long as you did not live in accordance to that definition, you would be a two faced hypocrite pretending to be a Quaker.

You were contacted, to transparently provide you with a copy of the EoP correspondence to Angry White Dude, because the article: On War, by U.S., General Smedley Butler; as posted to the Quaker website, was quoted in the correspondence; and your name – David Chandler – was and still is listed at the bottom of Quaker.org: Thinking About War and Participation in War, as follows: “Please contact us if you have information about local peace centers, military/draft counseling programs, related web sites, and other resources.Web site designed and maintained by David Chandler. Email address: david@mathwithoutborders.com”.

My apologies for providing you with information about Ecology of Peace root cause problem solving Ecology of Peace vs Masonic War is Peace Negotiations.

Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn
PO Box 5042, George East, 6539, RSA
GMC 4643-13 & 2578-14 Pro Se Applicant
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk