* Martin van Creveld … Joseph Dunford
» Martin van Creveld, Military History Visualized, Michael L. Valenti Major USMC, 6th Marine Corps Districts, Regional Marine Corps Community Service, Joseph Blackmon, Marine Corps Air Station Public Affairs Office, Marvin Marteabreau, SecDef James Mattis, Pentagon Press Secretary, Muslim Go Green, Albaseerah Org, Rahmah Foundation, Lamppost Productions, Cambride Mosque, Laleh Bakhtiar, Kazi Publications, Muslimah Speaks, Mona Eltahawy; Andrew Hamptonan, Robert Neller, Joseph Dunford.
* 29 Jun: EoP Thoughts Re: Martin van Creveld: A Modest Proposal & Nemesis
» Martin van Creweld: A Modest Proposal; Nemesis. Military History Visualized: General Mattis’ Way of War (2001 – 2003). Russian Resurrection: Battalion; The Great War: Russia’s New Offensive – The Russian Women’s Battalion of Death; Battle of the Camel: Mohammeds Wife Aisha. Barcroft TV: Interview with a Cannibal.
» Reuters: Woman re-interprets Koran with feminist view. Asharq AlAwsat: Al-Azhar Hails First Female Interpretation of the Quran. AnonHQ: Gender Equality: Muslim Women Question The Way Quran Is Interpreted. Qantara: ”It Is the Right for Every Muslim to Interpret the Quran for Themselves”. Step Feed: This is how Islam led the world with women’s rights. World Post: Alastair Crooke: Pt 1: You Can’t Understand ISIS If You Don’t Know the History of Wahhabism in Saudi Arabia. Huffington Post: Alastair Crooke: Pt 2: Middle East Time Bomb: The Real Aim of ISIS Is to Replace the Saud Family as the New Emirs of Arabia. CSpan Booknotes: Anthony Cave Brown: Treason in the Blood: H. St. John Philby, Kim Philby & the Spy Case of the Century. PBS Frontline: The House of Saud. The Real News: A Personal Take on the Modern History of Iraq – RAI with Sabah Alnasseri: 01.02.03.04.05.06. Mother Jones: America’s Devil’s Game with Extremist Islam: A Timeline of US-Cold War Politics and the Rise of Militant Islamism.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: EoP Ft Bragg; EoP AlSisi / EoP NWO SCO: EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Religion, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Media / Military Gospel / EoP v WiP NWO Neg.
From: EoP MILED Clerk <email@example.com>
Date: Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 9:15 PM
Subject: EoP Thoughts Re: Martin van Creveld: A Modest Proposal & Nemesis
To: Military History Visualized <firstname.lastname@example.org>, USMC Joseph Blackmon <email@example.com>, Marine Corps Air Station Public Affairs Office <BFRT_JPAO@usmc.mil>, Marvin Marteabreau <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Martin van Creveld via Contact Form.
CC: Military History Visualized (email@example.com)
CC: Michael L. Valenti Major, USMC via 6th Marine Corps Districts: Regional Marine Corps Community Service: Joseph Blackmon (firstname.lastname@example.org); Marine Corps Air Station: Public Affairs Office (BFRT_JPAO@usmc.mil); Marvin Marteabreau (email@example.com)
CC: SecDef James Mattis via Pentagon Press Secretary: @PentagonPresSec
CC: Islamic Scholars: Muslim Go Green: @MuslimGoGreen_; Albaseerah Org: @albaseerah_org; Rahmah Foundation: @TheRahmahFound; Lamppost Productions: @thelight99; Cambride Mosque: @CamMosqProject.
EoP Thoughts Re: Martin van Creveld: A Modest Proposal & Nemesis:
“Investigation shows that whenever two nations have become engaged in warfare they have been advancing on converging lines of [resource acquisition for growing consumption or procreation] self-interest and aggrandizement. When the contact takes place, the struggle for supremacy, or even survival is at hand. This inevitable hour is approximately fixed and determined by the angles of convergence plus the sum of the relative [consumption / breeding war] speed by which the nations are moving along their respective lines. Thus it is that, when the angle of [breeding / consumption war] convergence of both or even one of the nations is acute and the speed or progress along one or both of the converging lines correspondingly great, war results in a few years or decades.” – [EoP Amended] Homer Lea, Valour of Ignorance; Military Gospel.
In Eve’s Seed: Masculine Insecurity, Metaphor, and the Shaping of History, and Eve’s Seed: Biology, the Sexes and the Course of History, Robert McElvaine described it thus: “Karl Marx had it wrong. Class has, to be sure, been a major factor in history; but class itself is a derivative concept that is based on the ultimate causative power in history: sex. Marx‘s famous formulation must be revised: The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of struggles based on the division of our species into two sexes, jealousies emanating from this division, exaggerations of the differences between the sexes, misunderstandings about sexual reproductive power, and metaphors derived from sex. Together, these closely related matters constitute the most important, but largely neglected, set of motive forces in human history. Control — or the claim of control — over the means of reproduction has been even more fundamental to history than has control of the means of production…
Robert McElvaine “throws down the gauntlet to academics and non-specialists alike, daring a radical rethinking of the basic ‘truths’ on which cultures have been constructed.” He argues that “there is nothing unique to Islam about male insistence on the subordination of and male control over women and their bodies.” McElvaine says misogynistic rulers may be religious fanatics, but their religion is not Islam, but Woody Allen‘s religion in his 2001 movie, The Curse of the Jade Scorpion: “insecure masculinity”.
– Robert McElvaine: Eve’s Seed: History and ‘Control of Reproduction’ Religion of Masculine Insecurity.
Re: A Modest Proposal:
I never joined the military; in fact, I went to great effort to the point of living in my car, when I could not afford rent; to refuse employment when such employment required me to pay taxes to pay for wars.
I have no problem cooperating – providing my particular range of communication skills – with military: official or guerrilla, of all races, nations or religions – for example: Walk Your Footprint Talk Oath to Support the Troops — if their standing army war fighting is strategically focussed towards cooperating to shut down the WiP Ponzi profiteering of resource conflict and misery economy, by ‘turning off the tap’ — i.e. the breeding / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of war; by implementing an Ecology of Peace New World Order international law social contract; that requires all the worlds citizens of all races and religions to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; enabling humane and orderly deindustrialization and depopulation return to ecological carrying capacity limits.
If however they prefer to be Masonic War is Peace capitalist oligarch and citizens fuck honour war racket [Smedley Butler: War is a Racket] animal pawn [Henry Kissinger: “Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy”] macho penis hitmen cannon fodder; then that is their choice.
Operative Question for Military Commanders: Whom Should the Military Kill?
“Mattis stated in an interview with the author of the Mattis Way of War case study that if he could outfight the enemy commander; he wouldn’t have to fight his troops.” – Military History Visualized: General Mattis’ Way of War (2001 – 2003).
In the context of outfighting the enemy commander, which is – if you are an honourable warrior – always to find a win-win just solution to the resource conflict dispute you are engaged in: I don’t think it matters if the General or Admiral in charge of the troops has a vagina [Russian Resurrection: Battalion; The Great War: Russia’s New Offensive – The Russian Women’s Battalion of Death; Battle of the Camel: Mohammeds Wife Aisha] or a penis, or both or none, if the General or Admiral’s ego’s are capable of confronting Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality principles.
In that context, the only operative question for such military commander’s honourable discussion, between themselves and with their troops; is: Whom should the military kill?
The EoP Scientific & Cultural Law EoP TRC [Truth & Reconciliation] Answer is:
As part of a Legal Military Truth and Reconciliation Tribunal Process – ex: EoP v Nobel – Give the Breeding / Consumption Scarcity Combatants – of all races, religions and classes – the opportunity to take personal responsibility for their former Breeding/Consumption above Ecological Carrying Capacity limits transgressions; by cooperating to implement an EoP intn’l law social contract; that (a) requires all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizes all property and provides all responsible freedom oath citizens a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized sustainable future.
» IG: 17-06-12_nyt-climatedealneedsbigstick-2.
Regarding individuals – of whatever race, religion or gender – who have violent proclivities; or any other – example cannibal [Barcroft TV: Interview with a Cannibal] – fetish that mainstream society frowns upon; under Ecology of Peace scientific and cultural law, adults who are abiding by scientific law procreation and consumption laws; may according to cultural law fully informed consent principles: engage in non-conformist or unusual relating experiences; including experiences involving violence and/or death; with other adults; as long as the relating experiences are based upon fully informed consent; of all the individuals involved.
EoP SciCult Law: Cultural Law Territorial Self Rule for Groups with Subjective Racial, Religious& Gender Culture-Conflict Identities:
Individuals and/or groups of individuals who are willing to cooperate, and whose sharing of particular socio-cultural values enable them to engage in a higher level of cooperation; should be provided any assistance to enable such greater cooperation.
Individuals or racial, religious or gender based groups of individuals who have signed their Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration Oaths should not be coerced into residential territorial integration with groups of individuals who have conflicting racial, religious or gender based subjective socio-cultural values.
Individuals or racial, religious or gender based groups of individuals who abide by their Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration Oaths, in terms of procreation, consumption and fully informed consenting agreements, can peacefully coexist as neighbouring tribes or communities; who have conflicting subjective racial, religious or gender based cultural values; but keep their particular subjective racial, religious or gender based cultural value rules within the confines of their group’s territory.
Consequently the State shall grant any – ideological, racial, religious, gender group of secessionist minded individuals – limited secessionist tribal ‘subjective cultural fully informed consent rulemaking’ self determination restriction of immigration into their territory, from any other group that does share some of their tribes fully informed consenting subjective socio-racial or religious cultural values; in exchange for such tribe abiding by honourable and orderly deindustrialization and depopulation by enforcing procreation, consumption and fully informed consenting agreements amongst the members of their racial or religious tribe.
Put differently if a group of individuals abide by their breeding, consumption and fully informed consenting relating agreements EoP social contract values; and conduct their fully informed consenting agreement relating activities that other groups may find offensive; within the confines of their clearly delineated fully informed consenting agreed upon ‘Cultural Law Self Rule’ residential community; such relating activity shall be considered lawful; and cannot be legally restricted or punished by a different group of individuals who have different subjective racial, religious or gender behavioural preferences or values..
– EoP NTE GM: Cultural Law Self Rule.
Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality stated in other racial, religious terminology:
In David Lane’s ‘14 words’:
We must legally protect the natural capital foundation of all life for all species; by implementing an EoP intnl law social contract; that limits all human procreation and consumption to ecological carrying capacity limits; thereby securing the indefinite existence future of our natural capital resource foundation for all responsible freedom cooperating humans from all races, classes, and religions.
In Tragedy of Commons Bible commandment:
Thou shalt not [promote, legislate, enforce or obey laws which enable human’s procreation or consumption to] transgress ecological carrying capacity limits. – [EoP Amended] Garrett Hardin
In Islamic Hadith:
An [EoP] Muslim eats [breeds & consumes] in one intestine; while a [WiP] Kafir eats [breeds & consumes] in seven intestines.” – [EoP Amended] al-Bukhari, al-Sahih, Hadith 6396.
– IG: 17-06-08_eoprhfr-dlanetochadith.
Military Endorsing Ecological Overshoot is Criminal:
Military Endorsing Ecological Overshoot is criminal – Maj. Gen. Dana J.H. Pittard, as Commander at Ft. Bliss, cut ‘criminal’ energy use, increased recycling, conserved water as a matter of security. – LA Times: At one Army base, a vision for a new shade of green.
The problem with direct action [anti-terror] raids is … you can kill or capture enemy leaders, set back their organization; but I those kinds of blows were never decisive. The problem is they give you the illusion of activity and the illusion of progress. They make you feel like you are doing something; and in reality terrorism, is a symptom of wider [resource conflict resulting from right to breed/consume above ecological carrying capacity limits international law clauses] problems; and so if you just go after the symptoms, over time; you’ll feel good about it. You can even point to your constituents or point to anybody, look at all we’re doing’; but the problem can actually be getting worse. If you’re just striking & you don’t go after the base problems; … you can find yourself lopsided. You learn you’ve only learnt how to wack, & we say its the wack a mole; & you can continue that indefinately. – [EoP Amended] Stan McChrystal; Foreign Affairs: Military Strategy.
“I am an an accidental environmentalist. .. There’s a direct relationship between energy & the military. The more energy consumed, the less effective you are militarily because you’re more vulnerable. .. Why should I be concerned about climate change? Climate change brings about global instability. That makes the world more vulnerable and it’s more likely that soldiers like myself will have to fight and die somewhere.” – Steven Anderson; Yes: The Real Reason the Military is Going Green.
The military has been concerned about oil dependence for decades. This isn’t some newly green military. When they do have to fight a war, they want to mitigate risks to their personnel & equipment. Eight presidents have declared addiction to foreign oil a threat to national security. That would mean anyone using foreign oil is aiding & abetting an enemy. Anyone, who doesn’t aggressively cut oil consumption to within domestic production is technically committing treason.” – Andrew Holland, senior fellow for energy and climate policy at the non-partisan American Security Project; Yes: The Real Reason the Military is Going Green.
– IG: 17-04-15_ecologicalovershootiscriminal.
A copy of this correspondence shall be documented at EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations.
Lara Johnstone, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn [EoP Oath PDF]
PO Box 5042, George East, 6539, RSA
GMC 4643-13 & 2578-14 Pro Se Applicant
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk
Notice to Martin van Creveld: via Contact Form:
EoP correspondence to Martin van Creveld via Contact Form; sent 29 Jun 2017: 21:40 hrs.
CC: Military History Visualized; Michael L. Valenti Major, USMC via 6th Marine Corps Districts: Regional Marine Corps Community Service: Joseph Blackmon; Marine Corps Air Station: Public Affairs Office; Marvin Marteabreau; SecDef James Mattis via Pentagon Press Secretary; Islamic Scholars: Muslim Go Green; Albaseerah Org; Rahmah Foundation; Lamppost Productions; Cambride Mosque; Laleh Bakhtiar; Kazi Publications; Muslimah Speaks; Mona Eltahawy; is documented at: EoP Leg Sub: 29 Jun: Martin van Creveld.
Notices via Twitter:
Pentagon Press Secretary: @PentagonPresSec; Andrew Hamptonan: @AndrewHamptonan; Robert Neller: @GenRobertNeller; Joseph Dunford: @GenDunford.
Islamic Scholars: Muslim Go Green: @MuslimGoGreen_; Albaseerah Org: @albaseerah_org; Rahmah Foundation: @TheRahmahFound; Lamppost Productions: @thelight99; Cambride Mosque: @CamMosqProject; Laleh Bakhtiar: @lalehbakhtiar; Kazi Publications: @kazipublication; Muslimah Speaks: @muslimah_speaks; Mona Eltahawy: @monaeltahawy
EoP MILED Clerk: 29 Jun 2017: 21:41 hrs: @PentagonPresSec SD Mattis @MuslimGoGreen_ @albaseerah_org @TheRahmahFound @thelight99 @CamMosqProject EoP corr 4 u http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2017/06/29-jun-martin-van-creveld/
EoP MILED Clerk: 29 Jun 2017: 21:48 hrs: @PentagonPresSec SD Mattis @MuslimGoGreen_ @albaseerah_org @TheRahmahFound @thelight99 @CamMosqProject @lalehbakhtiar @kazipublication @muslimah_speaks @monaeltahawy @AndrewHamptonan @GenRobertNeller @GenDunford EoPcorr http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2017/06/29-jun-martin-van-creveld/