* Linda Ford … Counterpunch
* 25 Jul: EoP response to Linda Ford: Counterpunch: Feminism Co-opted
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub / EoP NWO SCO: EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media / EoP v WiP ism / EoP v WiP NWO Neg.
From: EoP MILED Clerk <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 2:22 PM
Subject: EoP response to Linda Ford: Counterpunch: Feminism Co-opted
To: Linda Ford <email@example.com>
Cc: “CC: Counterpunch” <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Linda Ford (email@example.com)
CC: Counterpunch (firstname.lastname@example.org);
Linda or Ms Ford, as you prefer:
EoP response to Linda Ford: Counterpunch: Feminism Co-opted.
Re: Counterpunch: Feminism Co-opted.
Perhaps cause I grew up outside of, or on the borders of, Western industrial civilization’s contact with other culture’s, or cause I spent many years travelling and living in different cultures, or perhaps cause logic and reasoning wise, I am on the village idiot end of the scale, I don’t know; but either way: I never thought of myself as an ‘industrial civilization feminist’.
I don’t judge an individual based upon their race, gender, class, physical appearance, etc; but on their character: their honour aka honesty, to friend or foe.
Herewith a few Ecology of Peace perspective’s of WiP ism’s, including WiP feminism:
I imagine your particular concept of feminism was – consciously or unconsciously: See EoP Summary of WiP History – one of the many different Masonic War is Peace sub-cultural versions of feminism – none of which are clearly defined, viz a viz ecological carrying capacity limits – the resource foundation for all the food you eat, air you breathe, water you drink, resources you use for shelter, etc – because the more vaguely any WiP ‘ism’, including ‘feminism’ was defined, the easier it was for the ism-elite to find insecure men and/or women to sign up as cattle to buy their ‘ism’ books, go to their workshops, pay their speaking fees, etc.
As noted at EoP v WiP Law:
Legal Tyranny of Vague Definitions: A Legal Tyranny occurs in family, community, nation, planet where the verbal and/or written social contract jurisprudence has vague and abstract legal definitions: particularly as relating to denying the members of the community clear and simple information on (a) the root causes of resource conflicts; (b) the communication and negotiations skills and tools to non-violently, if that is their preference, resolve resource conflict disputes that address the root causes of the resource conflict, and enable a win-win solution to the resource conflict dispute.
Simple Justice EoP Scientific and Cultural Law:
Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural Law is an effort to provide all families, communities, nations with a functional win-win resource conflict solving international law social contract template, that (a) is scientifically based upon the authority – not of men, women, race or religion – but scientific ecological carrying capacity limits, is so simple – breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits, and cheaters will be eliminated from commons genepool – it can be explained to a child or an adult, that western industrial educational system civilization considers ‘illiterate’; (b) allows for responsible freedom informed consent cultural law self rule: this allows groups of individuals who share a preference for a particular, racial, religious or social practice, and/or a preference for relating to others who share their preferential racial, cultural or religious practices; to live in separate tribal communities from others who don’t share their cultural practices; practicing self rule regulation of their cultural practices. The EoP scientific and cultural law template allows for diverse groups with many different cultural practices to live in neighbouring villages, nations; without inter-cultural or resource conflict, to the extent that they strictly hold each other, and the individuals within their tribes, accountable to abiding by scientific and cultural law social contract laws.
As noted at: EoP v WiP ism’s:
If your ‘feminism’ has no buck stops here concern for establishing an international law social contract that legally requires all nations to conserve their national resources; upon which all of life’s species rely upon for survival and sustenance; in accordance with ecological carrying capacity limits; by requiring all nation’s citizens – of all races, religions, ideologies and genders – to restrict their procreation and/or consumption to below ecological carrying capacity limits; then your ‘feminism’ efforts to pretend to be concerned about conserving any other religious, racial, gender or class cultural values is akin to farting against thunder. Put simply: If your feminism is not about conserving the ecological carrying capacity resource foundations upon which all of life reside; your ‘feminism’ ain’t nothing but fuck honour bullshit the public relations image management vote welfare bribery.
Of course the same could – and has been said – for WiP liberalism, socialism, communism, nationalism, monarchism, progressivism, capitalism, racial powerism, feminism, Nazism, Zionism, Pan Africanism, LGBTism, or any of the other dozens of WiP isms.
Masonic War is Peace ism’s — like WiP law, religion, media, charity, psychology, academia, etc — consciously or unconsciously ignores or avoids educating their readers, customers, clients, etc of the — procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits; enabled by the WiP right to procreate and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits clauses of international law — root causes of all — racial, religious, gender, economic, ideological, political, psychological, academic, media, military, etc — resource conflict; enabling them to socio-politically, economically, etc profit from the racial, religious and class resource war conflict misery, resulting from overpopulation/consumption colliding with finite resources.
Ecology of Peace ism’s — like EoP law, religion, media, charity, psychology, academia, etc — are founded upon EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality principles; providing advocacy and information on how to cooperate to shut down the WiP Ponzi profiteering of resource conflict and misery economy, by turning off the tap; — i.e. the breeding / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of — racial, religious, economic, ideological, political, gender, psychological, academic, media, military, etc — resource conflict and war; by implementing an EoP international law social contract that (a) requires all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizes all property and provides all responsible freedom oath citizens a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future. [See: Michael Ruppert: Collapse; Community Solution: The Power of Community: How Cuba Survived Peak Oil; Thompkins Conservation: The Next Economy].
Constructive Criticism Errors of Logic or Reasoning:
If you notice any errors of logic or reasoning regarding Ecology of Peace concepts of WiP ‘isms’, or any language that is ambiguous and can be made clearer and more simple, I would appreciate it if you could provide such constructive criticism feedback; so that I can make any corrections, if so required.
My communication policy values are available at: EoP ADR: Ego and Eco Literacy.
A copy of this correspondence shall be documented at EoP v WiP NWO Neg.
Lara Johnstone, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn [EoP Oath PDF]
PO Box 5042, George East, 6539, RSA
GMC 4643-13 & 2578-14 Pro Se Applicant
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk