EoP v WiP ism

EoP v WiP ism’s:

Ecology of Peace ism’s — like EoP law, religion, media, charity, psychology, academia, etc — are founded upon EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality principles; providing advocacy and information on how to cooperate to shut down the WiP Ponzi profiteering of resource conflict and misery economy, by turning off the tap; — i.e. the breeding / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of — racial, religious, economic, ideological, political, gender, psychological, academic, media, military, etc — resource conflict and war; by implementing an EoP international law social contract that (a) requires all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizes all property and provides all responsible freedom oath citizens a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future. [See: Michael Ruppert: Collapse; Community Solution: The Power of Community: How Cuba Survived Peak Oil; Thompkins Conservation: The Next Economy].

Masonic War is Peace ism’s — like WiP law, religion, media, charity, psychology, academia, etc — consciously or unconsciously ignores or avoids educating their readers, customers, clients, etc of the — procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits; enabled by the WiP right to procreate and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits clauses of international law — root causes of all — racial, religious, gender, economic, ideological, political, psychological, academic, media, military, etc — resource conflict; enabling them to socio-politically, economically, etc profit from the racial, religious and class resource war conflict misery, resulting from overpopulation/consumption colliding with finite resources.

EoP v WiP NWO Neg: EoP v WiP ism Correspondence.


EoP v WiP ism’s correspondence:

Could you clarify in a reasonable summary; what the factual and scientific principles are that the Alt Rights’s ‘factually and scientifically based worldview’ is based upon?

[..] If you are interested in a truthseeking enquiry discussion about which of your working hypothesis conclusions are based upon facts and science and which are not; that’s fine. Let’s cooperate and engage in a truthseeking enquiry. I’ll engage in a sincere – aka egological literate – truthseeking discussion with anyone, neo-nazi to Stalinist extremist; I don’t care.

If you are addicted to being right and shoving your racial, religious or class ideological bullshit down everyones throats, while blaming Zionists, communists, black, whites, rich, poor; keep drinking your Masonic War is Peace fuck honour and fuck ecological carrying capacity limits reality bullshit the public relations propaganda mindfuck games koolaid.
– EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 20 Dec: Occidental Observer .. Radical Honesty.


If your ‘conservatism’ has no buck stops here concern for establishing a legal social contract that legally conserves your nations resources; upon which all of life’s species rely upon for survival and sustenance; in accordance with ecological carrying capacity limits; by requiring your nation’s citizens to restrict their procreation and/or consumption to below ecological carrying capacity limits; then your ‘conservatism’ efforts to pretend to be concerned about conserving any other religious, racial or class cultural values is akin to farting against thunder. Put simply: If your conservatism is not about conserving the ecological carrying capacity resource foundations upon which all of life reside; your ‘conservatism’ ain’t nothing but fuck honour bullshit the public relations image management vote welfare bribery.”

Of course the same could be said for WiP liberalism, socialism, communism, nationalism, monarchism, progressivism, capitalism, racial powerism, feminism, Nazism, Zionism, Pan Africanism, etc.

EoP New Rules or WiP No Rules Los Pepes Negotiations:

‘If Wilson was right that competition occurs only when overcrowded numbers struggle for a scarce resources, then Malthus is confirmed; and humanity has little to look forward to but that chaotic day when in unlimited number we assassinate one another in our pursuit of inadequate resources. But if Wynne-Edwards is right, any population, human or non-human, has within its power the limitation of numbers through conventional rules and regulations and the capacity to abide by them.” – Robert Ardrey quoted in EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations infographic: 16-08-16_vputineopwipsocialcontract.

EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations focus is to ascertain whether anyone is interested in cooperating to ‘turn off the tap’ — i.e. the breeding / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of war; by implementing an Ecology of Peace New World Order international law social contract; that requires all the worlds citizens of all races and religions to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; enabling humane and orderly deindustrialization and depopulation return to ecological carrying capacity limits.
– EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 09 Mar: Truthseeker 24 .. Darwinian Conservatism.



Tygae IG: 17-04-21_eop-v-wip-ipatftptimpact


EoP ism International Law:

All EoP ism’s — whether national, racial, religious or ideological — require their members to procreate & consume below ecological carrying capacity limits & engage in fully informed consenting agreements. Informed Consent EoP Law allow the members to co-operatively & democratically decide for themselves what their – racial, religious, national or ideological – family, village or nation’s Informed Consent Cultural Laws should be; based upon their – racial, religious, national or ideological – preferences.

Keystone Predators maintain Ecological Equilibrium:
A keystone species — like the Platteau Pika in China or the Black Tailed Prairie Dog in Arizona — has a disproportionate effect on its environment relative to its abundance, affecting many other organisms in an ecosystem, helping to determine the types and numbers of various others species in a community. Such an organism plays a role in its ecosystem that is analogous to the role of a keystone in an arch. While the keystone feels the least pressure of any of the stones in an arch, the arch still collapses without it. Ecosystems experience a dramatic loss of biodiversity & equilibrium if the keystone species is removed. Keystone Predator-prey systems enhance ecological equilibrium and balance.

A starfish is the top predator upon a community of invertebrates inhabiting tidally inundated rock faces in the Pacific Northwest. The rest of the community included mollusks, barnacles and other invertebrates, for a total of 12 species (not counting microscopic taxa). When the starfish was removed the species were reduced to 11. Soon, an acorn barnacle and a mussel began to occupy virtually all available space, out competing other species. Species diversity dropped from more than 12 species to essentially 2. The starfish was a keystone predator, keeping the strongest competitors in check. Although it was a predator, it helped to maintain a greater number of species in the community. Its beneficial impact on species that were weak competitors is an example of an indirect effect.

EoP CommonSism Jurisprudence, restricting all human cultures, religions, races, etc to procreating and consuming below regional, national and international carrying capacity limits; if implemented function as a form of ‘legal /jurisprudence starfish’ Keystone predation, by eliminating the breeding and consuming predator cheaters, to (a) keep the system stable with regard to human population vis a vis other species and resources; and (b) restrict any one religion, race, or culture from overpredation; by outcompeting all other species (due to greater access to capital (consumption war predatory benefits) or human cannon fodder (breeding war predatory benefits).

» MILINT Earth Day Sign Up: Wayback Machine [archive.is/y3ZGO].
» IG: 17-04-21_eop-v-wip-ipatftptimpact.


WiP ism International Law

All WiP ism’s — whether national, racial, religious or ideological — allow their members to procreate & consume above ecological carrying capacity limits for the WiPism Ego-Conquest labour/resource profits. WiPism groups who procreate/consume above carrying capacity limits expand their WiPism tribes into other WiPism resource territory; to conquer, occupy & colonize other WiPism groups resources &/or coercively spread their WiPism culture. WiPism intn’l law is based upon force; not informed consent.

Predator/Parasite-Prey Growth-Collapse Cycle:
Predation: Predator-Prey and parasite-host involves interactions in which one organism consumes all or part (resources) of another. These linkages are the prime movers of energy through food chains. They are an important factor in the ecology of populations, determining mortality of prey and birth of new predators. Predation is an important evolutionary force: natural selection favors more effective predators and more evasive prey. “Arms races” have been recorded in some snails, which over time become more heavily armored prey, and their predators, crabs, which over time develop more massive claws with greater crushing power. Growth-Collapse predator-prey systems are potentially unstable.

Humans who engage in totalitarian agriculture, engage in Predator-Prey Growth and Collapse of Civilization/Empire cycles: Greco-Rome, Minoan, Mycenaean, Sumerians, Akkadian, Assyrian, Babylonian, Achaemenid, Seleucid, Zhou, Han, Tang, Song, Parthian, Sassanid, Umayyad, Abbasid, Mauryan, Gupta, Maya, Hittite, Harrapan and Teotihuacan. Collapses result from  (1) Ecological Strain and (2) Economic Strati fication and include the disappearance of between 90-99% of the populations (from famine, disease and organized violence resource wars) including their kings, Gods, calendars and other complex political and cultural institutions.

Economic Stratification Collapse occurs due to unequal consumption of resources generating Elites vs Commoners. As Elites become sizable and keep growing, they consume more; their over-exploitation results in collapse of resources to the Commoners; who experience famine and collapse. Elites — due to their wealth — do not suffer the detrimental effects of environmental collapse until much later than Commoners, which allows them to continue ‘business as usual’, despite the impending catastrophe; explaining how historical collapses were allowed to occur by seemingly oblivious elites (eg Roman & Mayan cases).

Ecological Overshoot Collapse can occur in the absence of economic stratification, when depletion of natural capital per capita is too high.

» MILINT Earth Day Sign Up: Wayback Machine [archive.is/y3ZGO].
» IG: 17-04-21_eop-v-wip-ipatftptimpact.


EoP Intnl Law: EoP Scientific & Cultural Law:

If or when an EoP International Law social contract is implemented; here is an idea of what EoP Scientific and Cultural Law shall be:

Scientific Law: Ecological Carrying Capacity — Eco Footprint — Scientific Law refers to: (a) Procreation below carrying capacity limits. (b) Consumption below carrying capacity limits. Human Nature Scientific Law refers to:  Fully Informed Consenting Agreements. Individuals Rights and Duties under Scientific Law include:  Property Ration for all individuals who have signed their Responsible Freedom Declaration OathsViolations of Scientific Law are referred to as Crimes of Aggression, which can be breeding, consumption and/or violation of consent crimes of aggression.

Cultural Law: Cultural law refers to any racial, religious, gender cultural value agreed upon, and codified in a written agreement between two or more individuals, which does not violate any of the scientific laws; enabling a greater degree of cooperation and mutual assistance support between such individuals. Individuals Rights and Duties under Cultural Law include: Cultural Law Territorial Self Rule for Groups with Subjective Racial, Religious& Gender Culture-Conflict IdentitiesViolations of Cultural Law would fall under Crimes of Aggression: Violations of Fully Informed Consent. Conflict of Cultural Law Violations: Violations of Cultural Law between two individuals or groups of individuals with different Cultural Laws, would be adjudicated in terms of Scientific Law: Crimes of Aggression: Violations of Fully Informed Consent.
» EoP NTE GMA Potus: EoP Scientific & Cutlural Laweop-scicultlaw