EoP v WiP Media

EoP v WiP Media:

Ecology of Peace Media — like EoP law, religion, charity, psychology, academia, etc — is founded upon EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality; providing EoP scientific and cultural law advocacy and information on how to cooperate to shut down the WiP Ponzi profiteering of resource conflict and misery economy, by turning off the tap; — i.e. the breeding / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of — racial, religious, economic, ideological, political, psychological, academic, media, military, etc — resource conflict and war; by implementing an EoP international law social contract that (a) requires all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizes all property and provides all responsible freedom oath citizens a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future. [See: Michael Ruppert: Collapse; Community Solution: The Power of Community: How Cuba Survived Peak Oil; Thompkins Conservation: The Next Economy]

Masonic War is Peace media — like WiP law, religion, charity, psychology, academia, etc — consciously or unconsciously ignores or avoids educating their readers, customers, clients, etc of the — procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits; enabled by the WiP right to procreate and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits clauses of international law — root causes of all — racial, religious, economic, ideological, political, psychological, academic, media, military, etc — resource conflict; enabling them to socio-politically, economically, etc profit from the racial, religious and class resource war conflict misery, resulting from overpopulation/consumption colliding with finite resources. See also: EoP Summary of WiP History.

.

Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality:

  1. Earth is not flat.
  2. Resources are finite.
  3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletion and resource conflict.
  4. Some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources include: poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc.
  5. The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits is the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the Masonic War is Peace international law social contract.
  6. If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, corporations and/or nations sincerely – aka egological literacy – want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate to nullify the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses and replace them with Ecology of Peace clauses that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool.

– Excerpt: Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality.

 

EoP Legal submissions involving WiP Media:

The following were EoP submissions filed to courts involving Mainstream and/or Alternative Media respondents:

EoP Legal Submissions: EoP v WiP Media Correspondence.

**

EoP NWO Social Contract Options involving WiP Media:

Ecology of Peace New World Order Social Contract Options that includes Mainstream and Alternative Media as respondents:

EoP Axis MilNec Evac: EoP v WiP NWO Neg: EoP v WiP Media Correspondence.

.

Excerpts of some EoP correspondence to, or about, or related to the consequences of WiP Mainstream or Alternative Media:

“If It Bleads, It Leads” Media’s Population-Terrorism Connection: Put Simply: Terrorists and their Victims are to the Corporate Media and Political Elite, what Bad Newz Kennels pitbulls Mel and Georgia were to Michael Vick, Purnell Peace, Quanis Phillips and Tony Taylor. When editors deliberately deny problem solving political activists access to public discourse to raise consciousness about the ecological, political, psychological etc socio-political problems in communities that require solving; they create a socio-political pressure cooker environment, where the problems get worse and worse, and the activists are forced to confront the reality that their only access to public discourse problem solving on their issues of concern is: violent terrorism, the more spectacular and brutally violent, the greater the “If It Bleads, It Leads” coverage; and un/fortunately the greater the Corporate Media Profits, and Politicians ability to use such violence for their own agenda’s of greater state tyranny control.
Norway v Breivik: 22 April 2012 :: Earth Day: Acquittal or Firing Squad; included as Annexure B to Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee Complaint; and Appeal to Curia Court.
» EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 11 Nov 2015: McChrystal Group. 23 Oct 2016: South China Morning Post .. Pentacon. 15 Nov 2016: Washington Post.. Russia Truth.
» IG: 17-07-22_eop-v-wip-media-04.

**

.Very much alive vs very dead – Russian or Not – Putin Dissidents.

For the Record: While I am not a Russian citizen, I have been critical of President Vladimir Putin and his governments policies, when I sincerely disagreed with his policies based upon constructive criticism as to an error of logic or fact. As Mr Putin knows, because the FSB like the NSA were granted permission to psychotronically monitor my thoughts, to confirm for them my motives; I have fuck all interest in approval ratings from Masonic War is Peace presidents, popes, generals, or their left or right, white or black, secular or religious Masonic War is Peace wing sperm donors and brood sows two-legged tax farm cattle, pretending to be ‘citizens’. I am happy to provide my buck stops here, the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth opinion and/or analysis or constructive criticism, sometimes in buck stops here extremely brutal language, on any issue, to support individuals, whether they are janitors or presidents to engage in root cause problem solving; which according to EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality principles, mean cooperating in terms of allocation of resources and advocacy towards the implementation of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract.

I am very much alive, even though I have requested President Putin and the Russian Government’s help with my assisted suicide plans; resulting from the American Goverments refusal to answer a simple question: Does Timothy McVeigh’s faked execution pardon allow for him to spend time with me, somewhere in the Siberian wilderness, before we depart this Masonic infested planet predominantly ruled by fuck honour fuck ecological carrying capacity European and Jewish men; planet together.
— EoP Leg Sub: M Rubio, R Tillerson: EoP RH Factual Reality and War Criminal Questions.

.

 

Michael Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population Environment Connection

Recent surveys show that Americans are less concerned about population than they were 25 years ago, and they aren’t connecting environmental degradation to population growth. News coverage is a significant variable affecting public opinion, and how reporters frame a problem frequently signals what is causing the problem. Using a random sample of 150 stories about urban sprawl, endangered species and water shortages, Part I of this study shows that only about one story in 10 framed population growth as a source of the problem. Further, only one story in the entire sample mentioned population stability among the realm of possible solutions. Part II presents the results of interviews with 25 journalists whose stories on local environmental problems omitted the causal role of population growth. It shows that journalists are aware of the controversial nature of the population issue, and prefer to avoid it if possible. Most interviewees said that a national phenomenon like population growth as beyond the scope of what they could write as local reporters.

In How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population-Environment Connection, Prof.
Michael Maher states that How Do Journalists Think?; “offer a cognitive psychology model
that suggests that journalists construct hypotheses in pursuing news stories, but that reporters tend to indulge in a host of causal attribution errors. Among these are the tendency to oversimplify, to prefer anecdotal information over more valid statistical information, and the “fundamental attribution error” —the “tendency to weigh personal causal variables more than situational variables” (p.47). Since population growth is a situational force, this model suggests why journalists might attribute urban sprawl to developers rather than to population growth.

“The shallowness of media coverage has attracted scholarly comment as early as Lippmann
(1922), who pointed out that journalists must deal in stereotypes because of deadline pressures and readers’ preference for simplicity. Many other scholars have commented on the shallow, episodic nature of the news. “The news we are given is not fit for a democracy; it is superficial, narrow, stereotypical, propaganda-laden, of little explanatory value, and not geared for critical debate or citizen action,” Bennett (1988, p. 9) wrote. Linsky (1988) noted, “The event-orientation of news is a particular problem, for it steers coverage away from ideas and context and does nothing to encourage the drawing of connections between stories” (p. 216).

Entman (1989) identified three production biases common to media stories: 1. simplification —audiences prefer the simple to the complex; 2. personalization —individuals cause events rather than institutional, historical or other abstract forces; 3. symbolization — audiences want dramatic action, intriguing personality, and stirring slogans, and the media
provide them. Bennett (1988) offered a similar list of weaknesses in media content: emphasis on people rather than process, and on crisis rather than continuity; isolation of stories from each other, and official assurances of normalcy.

“In sum, many existing theories can explain the consistent tendency by journalists to avoid
mentioning population growth as a source of the problems they cover. Without further evidence, we really cannot tell. Graber has called for more study on the etiology of content: “Why are particular events selected from the large number of events that might be publicized and why are events cast into particular story frames that supply the interpretive background by which the story is judged?” (1989, p. 146).

Dr. Michael Maher concludes his How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population-
Environment Connection study as follows: “As we have seen, both land development
economists and environmental experts acknowledge population growth as a key source of environmental change. But journalists frame environmental causality differently. “Why? Communication theory offers several possibilities. First is the hegemony-theory interpretation: reporters omit any implication that population growth might produce negative effects, in order to purvey the ideology of elites who make money from population growth. As Molotch and Lester (1974) put it, media content can be viewed as reflecting “the practices of those having the power to determine the experience of others” (p. 120). Since real estate, construction and banking interests directly support the media through advertising purchases, this interpretation seems plausible. A number of media critics (e.g., Gandy, 1982; Altschull, 1984; Bennett, 1988) have suggested that media messages reflect the values of powerful political and commercial interests. Burd (1972), Kaniss (1991) and others have pointed out that newspapers have traditionally promoted population growth in their cities through civic boosterism. Molotch (1976) even suggested that cities can best be understood as entities competing for population growth, with the city newspaper as chief cheerleader.

“Certainly most reporters would be incensed at the suggestion that they shade their reporting to placate commercial interests. But Breed’s classic study of social control in the newsroom (1955) showed that news managers’ values are transmissible to journalists through a variety of pressures: salaries, story assignments, layout treatment, editing, and a variety of other strategies that effectively shape news stories in ways acceptable to management.

“Another possible explanation for why journalists omit population growth from their story
frame is simple ignorance of other explanations. Journalists who cover environmental issues
may not be aware of any other possible ways to frame these stories, thus they derive their
framing from other journalists. Journalists frequently read each other’s work and take cues for coverage from other reporters, particularly from the elite media (Reese & Danielian, 1989).

Perhaps the pervasive predictability of the story frames examined in Part I is another example of intermedia influence. On the other hand, it seems difficult to believe that journalists could be ignorant of the role population growth plays in environmental issues, because media coverage frequently ties population growth to housing starts and business expansion. Furthermore, “Why” is one of the five “W’s” taught in every Journalism 101 course. A public affairs reporting textbook, Interpreting Public Issues (Griffin, Molen, Schoenfeld, & Scotton, 1991), admonishes journalists: “A common journalistic mistake is simply to cover events—real or staged—and ignore underlying issues” (p. 320). The book identified population trends as one of the “big trouble spots,” and listed world population as the first of its “forefront issues in the ’90s” (p. 320). Hence, we cannot say that reporting basic causality is beyond the role that journalists ascribe for themselves. Indeed a panel at the 1994 Society of Environmental Journalists discussed “Covering Population as a Local Story” (Wheeler, 1994).

But ignorance remains a possible reason, for not all reporters have training in environmental issues. “A third possible explanation comes from the “spiral of silence” theory by German scholar Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann (1984): “The fear of isolation seems to be the force that sets the spiral of silence in motion. To run with the pack is a relatively happy state of affairs; but if you can’t, because you won’t share publicly in what seems to be a universally acclaimed conviction, you can at least remain silent, as a second choice, so that others can put up with you. “According to Noelle-Neumann, “the media influence the individual perception of what can be said or done without danger of isolation”. Media coverage legitimates a given perspective. Lack of media coverage—omitting a perspective consistently from media stories—makes the expression of that perspective socially dangerous. Noelle-Neumann also suggested that the media serve an articulation function: “The media provide people with the words and phrases they can use to defend a point of view. If people find no current, frequently repeated expressions for their point of view, they lapse into silence; they become effectively mute”.
» Minnesotans for Sustainability: How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population Environment Connection. [archive.is/Syl4O]
» IG: 17-04-16_eop-v-wip-media.

.