EoP v WiP Psych:
Ecology of Peace Psych — like EoP law, media, religion, charity, academia, etc — is founded upon EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality; providing EoP scientific and cultural law advocacy and information for individuals on how to cooperate to shut down the WiP Ponzi profiteering of resource conflict and misery economy, by turning off the tap; — i.e. the breeding / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of — racial, religious, economic, ideological, political, psychological, academic, media, military, etc — resource conflict and war; by implementing an EoP international law social contract that (a) requires all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizes all property and provides all responsible freedom oath citizens a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future. [See: Michael Ruppert: Collapse; Community Solution: The Power of Community: How Cuba Survived Peak Oil; Thompkins Conservation: The Next Economy].
Masonic War is Peace Psych — like WiP law, media, religion, charity, academia, etc — consciously or unconsciously ignores or avoids educating their readers, customers, clients, etc of the — procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits; enabled by the WiP right to procreate and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits clauses of international law — root causes of all — racial, religious, economic, ideological, political, psychological, academic, media, military, etc — resource conflict; enabling them to socio-politically, economically, etc profit from the racial, religious and class resource war conflict misery, resulting from overpopulation/consumption colliding with finite resources. See also: EoP Summary of WiP History.
EoP v WiP NWO Neg: EoP v WiP Psych Correspondence.
EoP Legal submissions involving WiP Psych:
The following were EoP submissions filed to courts involving WiP Psychologists or Psychiatrists respondents:
- US & ZA: LJ v B Blanton.
- RU: EoP FSB.
- NO: Norway v Anders Breivik.
- JP: Japan v Satoshi Uematsu.
- ZA: State v L Johnstone; LJ v CH Johnstone, LJ v FT Moe.
EoP Legal Submissions: EoP v WiP Psych Correspondence.
EoP NWO Social Contract Options involving WiP Psych:
Ecology of Peace New World Order Social Contract Options that includes Psych as respondents:
- INT: EoP Axis Military Necessity Evacuation: Intnl Lotto: Intnl Psych.
EoP Axis MilNec Evac: EoP v WiP NWO Neg: EoP v WiP Psych Correspondence.
EoP v WiP Psych Overview:
Ecology of Peace culture is unaware of any scientifically based ‘mental disorder’ legal definition. Consequently, there is no such thing as a ‘mental disorder’ in the Ecology of Peace culture.
Masonic War is Peace culture’s have various different cultural – political correctness conformity – based ‘mental disorder’ definitions [Dr Jeffrey Schaler: Psychiatry is a Fraud]. Not an obedient Masonic War is Peace culture communist, you have a mental disorder. Not an obedient Masonic War is Peace culture capitalist, you have a mental disorder, and so on [Dr John Breeding: Political Psychiatry].
The Ecology of Peace culture’s working hypothesis conclusion is that much of what Masonic War is Peace culture’s refer to as ‘mental disorders’ are simply individuals consciously or unconsciously rebelling or emotionally, psychologically, economically struggling to authentically relate and/or existentially cope in a Masonic War is Peace society focused on parasitically profiting from – gender, class, racial, religious, psychological and military – resource war conflict misery. ‘War is the organizing principle of [the Left and Right Wings of the Masonic War is Peace] social contract’ – [EoP Amended] Mr X, JFK. See also EoP v WiP STRATINT & EoP v WiP National Security.
Put differently: Masonic War is Peace psychologists and psychiatrists, consciously and/or unconsciously to greater and lesser degrees, do not currently base their psychological doctrine social conflict mitigation and reduction management psycho-therapy practice upon Ecological Reality Facts; recognizing the possibility that their patients alleged culturally based ‘mental disorder’; is a direct, or at least partially a direct result of alleged social conflict experts — psychologists, lawyers, social workers, religious workers, charity workers — failure to expose the root cause of all military, economic, political, religious, racial, gender, psychological resource conflict: the right to breed and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits Masonic War is Peace clauses of international law. Some psychologists are heading in the direction of root cause problem solving, such as Dr. Paula Caplan: Losing Labels to find ourselves; Dr. Mary Boyle: Is clinical psychology fearful of social context?. Why we might be, why it matters and what we might do about it:
“I got the very powerful impression that Laird and Clark seemed to sense that fully engaging with context would make it much more difficult to pursue their core arguments that the main causes of misery are anxiety and depression. That the major reason for misery’s persistence is how people think; and that a major part of the solution is individual therapy. Now it certainly complicates funding discussions with government; as you can imagine, if they did engage with context. So this brings me to my second question, what is it about confronting well evidenced role of social context; in both the development and the persistence of mental health problems; which seems so difficult even threatening. I think there is quite a few possibilities and I’ll deal with a few briefly. But familiarly over all of them is both our insecurity as a discipline and a profession. So the threats are: Its not science. Its not psychology. Creates feelings of helplessness. Need for acceptance by Psychiatry. Involves telling truth to power. …. Now psychology as a whole is intensely concerned about its academic and social acceptance; as a science. Jim Orford once said “We still suffer from an inferiority complex making us do things just because they appear scientific. So we emphasize our similarity to the biological and natural sciences. We give the highest to the methods of the natural sciences. We are also very preoccupied with avoiding accusations of social and political bias; of being influenced by subjective values; rather than objective facts.” …. Why our avoidance of context matters so much, the major implication is that our theories and research are always potentially influential. Whether we approve it, intend it or whether we are even aware of it; what we say and do will have influence in so far as particular psychological ideas become part of a construction of reality; which can then be drawn on by those with the power to frame social problems and their perceived solutions. … It suggests that when we as psychologists conceptualize people and their problems; it becomes a kind of cultural resource; and above all, a relation to this avoidance of context; I think this model shores how our theories can help maintain the social and economic status-quo. .. through narratives of justification. Now its often been pointed out that maintaining harmful social practices or inequalities; usually needs some sort of public story; which makes them seem reasonable. And if we look at it from the point of view of those who benefit from inequalities; an especially powerful narrative is one which distracts attention from context; which could help us understand why some groups are persistently disadvantaged or suffering; why their behaviour seems difficult; and instead focuses on mental or biological characteristics; which seem to explain these outcomes. Historically psychology has provided a major role in providing these narratives. … Now it’s important to emphasize that we don’t intend social harm, but our profession simply has to provide the intellectual framework — and of course give it scientific respectability — others will do the rest. … Context also make it much more difficult for those in power to avoid addressing the psychological impact of social and economic policies; and also they are not incompatible with helping individuals. I don’t think its an exaggeration to say that clinical psychology is at a watershed in terms of who we are and what we stand for. I hope we will acknowledge that how we relate to social context is absolutely central to those questions; and I also hope we will choose to implement the conference theme in major and very public ways. ”
Ecology of Peace Therapy:
Ecology of Peace therapy, like Ecology of Peace alternative dispute resolution; focuses on the root cause cause of the particular problem, and most problems are a direct or indirect result of military, religious, racial, economic, political etc resource conflict; and all resource conflict problems are a result of laws that allow beings who call themselves humans, to breed and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, pretending the earth’s resources are infinite; and that resource conflict is the fault of some racial, religious or ideological group of individuals.
If your activism to end racism, slavery, oppression, climate change; food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, climate change, feminism, nazism, Islamism, capitalism, communism, militarization of police, etc; does not include discussion of the root – ‘right to breed / consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the Masonic War is Peace social contract –overpopulation and consumption causes of those socio-economic, psycho-political and ecological resource war problems; your activism is just another ‘Its not about the Nail’ Masonic War is Peace Bullshit the Public Relations Stunt.
If the nail you are hammering is to abolish the Masonic War is Peace social contract and replace it with an Ecology of Peace social contract; then that nail is simultaneously addressing a multitude of ecological overshoot problems: whether crime and violence, unemployment and poverty, food shortages, inflation, political instability, loss of political freedoms, conformist political correctness, vanishing species, garbage and pollution, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, resource depletion, etc.
Put simply the nail is in the bulls eye target zone, and each hammer strike, sends problem solving solution ripples to each of all of these problems; whereas if you find a nail and stick it in only one of these problem areas; each hammer strike is pointless; because in the absence of addressing the root cause of the problem: Masonic War is Peace ‘right to breed/consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ social contract; the particular problem you are focussed on is only going to get worse; as the tap of overpopulation / overconsumption-ecological overshoot resource scarcity grows and grows and grows.
— EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 28 Feb: Malcolm X Grassroots Movement .. COWS: Context of White Supremacy.
01: US Army Special Operations Command: DCoE Mental Health & TBI Care Challenge [PDF]
1.A 04 June: US Army Special Operations Command: DCoE Mental Health & TBI Care Challenge.
1.B Possible EoP MilNec Psychotronic response to USASOC: DCoE Psych Health & TBI Challenge: Excerpt: Ecology of Peace Amicus Curiae Consent Request Correspondence in the matter of South Carolina v Dylan Storm Roof: Ch.3.C: EoP v WiP CommCorr: Intnl Psychology notified of AME-Dylan Roof EoP Amicus Request.
1.C Lt Col Dave Grossman: Cultural Conspiracy — Sexology & Killology — Denial and Repression.
02: South Carolina v Dylann Storm Roof: EoP Amicus Correspondence to International Psych [PDF].
2.A: International Psychology & Psychiatry: Re: EoP Amicus Request Re: WiP Case: AME Church v Dylan Storm Roof. See also: Ecology of Peace Amicus Curiae Consent Request Correspondence in the matter of South Carolina v Dylan Storm Roof [PDF]: Chapter 3.C: EoP v WiP CommCorr: International Psychiatry & Psychology notified of AME-Dylan Roof EoP Amicus Request.
Sent to: TO: FBI RH Fraud complaint individuals; INT, EU, CA, UK, RU, USA Psych Org & Ind; Critical Psychiatry; EcoPsychology.
03: David Hoffman: American Psychological Association & CIA Torture Ethics Review Report [PDF]
3.A David Hoffman and APA: Does Hoffman Report Review have a sincere Conflict problem solving focus; or is it a bullshit the public relations event?
3.B Jean Maria Arrigo: Peat Intel: Director and Coalition for an Ethical Psychology: Spokesperson: Re: Whether Hoffman Report Review has a sincere conflict problem solving focus; or is it a bullshit the public relations event?
04: GMC 4643-13 & 2578-14 Respondents & Counsel, SA Courts; Re: EoP v WiP NWO Psych Ethics [PDF].
4.A GMC 4643-13 & 2578-14 Respondents & Counsel, SA Courts; Re: EoP v WiP NWO Psych Ethics.
4.B GMC 2578-14 Respondents: Frode & Talitha Moe; Counsel: Millers Inc.
4.C GMC 4643- 13 Johnstone Family Respondents: Clive & Ann Johnstone.
4.D Family Policy Institute & Unashamedly Ethical Executive Committee and International Advisors: Are your conflict problem solving ethics founded on EoP or WiP values?
4.E GMC 4643-13: Radical Honesty Respondents: Brad Blanton & Radical Honesty Trainers
4.F McChrystal Group: Organizational Psychologist: Rachel Mendelowitz.
05: Miscellaneous Psych related correspondence [PDF].
5.A American Psychological Association: Listserv Access
5.B APA Listserv: Div 34 Population and Environmental Professional issues and Div 19 Announcements only.
5.C Peter Levenda: Sinister Forces: A Grimoire of American Political Witchcraft
5D Dr Brad Blanton and Radical Honesty aka Radical Hypocrisy
5E Australian Signals Directorate, Queensland Mental Health Commission; Tim Johnston; Re: Nathan Llewpas
* 14 November 2015 10:06 PM – 24 November 2015 10:32 PM correspondence: Re: Nathan Llewpas dispute with Australian Signals Directorate and Queensland Mental Health Commission [PDF]
* Beirut Rules Transcript : Correspondence sent to and received by Lara Johnstone subsequent to 24 Nov 2015: 10:32 hrs Re: Nathan Llewpas dispute with Australian Signals Directorate, Queensland Mental Health Commission [PDF]
5F What a Way to Go: Life at the End of Empire: Timothy Scott Bennett; Real News: US Foreign Policy; Masonic, Environmental & Psychological Dogma Revisionism.
5G EoP Therapy vs SHAM WiP Therapy Wars response to Guardian: Therapy Wars and the Revenge of Freud by Oliver Burkeman.
5H Addiction Psych Experts: WiP cultural addiction to Bullsh*t the Public Relations Marketing Koolaid
5I Critical Psychiatry: Miscellaneous Correspondence
06: EoP Axis ICC Military Necessity Evacuation [PDF]
6.A Ecology of Peace Axis Military Necessity Evacuation
07: Pres GW Bush & SecDef D Rumsfeld: Faked Execution & Pardon of OKC Bomber: Timothy James McVeigh: Terms of Agreement [PDF]
7.A Pres GW Bush & SecDef D Rumsfeld: Faked Execution & Pardon of OKC Bomber: Timothy James McVeigh: Terms of Agreement